|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
76
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 17:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Before 1.8 no one had sentinel, and if you did, thats okay, but I did not. And from there I skilled into assault/logi stuff because I had the SP. Alas 1.8 came out making sentinels logi cake, but costing moar SP. Although I love my sentinel, I lost alot of SP on other weapons and equipment that are useless to me now, how sad...
If this happened to you, I don't feel bad, because it happend to me. Although empathy is acceptable.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
NBK The Leppy
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I had to ditch all my light frame / scout suit SP to afford the Sentinel SP. Why anyone ran Sentinels pre 1.8 will always be beyond me, Basic Heavies were where it was at.
Awwww yeah son, *high five*!
Director of G.R.A.V.E
NBK The Leppy
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I had to ditch all my light frame / scout suit SP to afford the Sentinel SP. Why anyone ran Sentinels pre 1.8 will always be beyond me, Basic Heavies were where it was at. How do sentinels cost more sp now?
WE never skilled into sentinel because they were worse than basic pre-1.8.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote:mordiby wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I had to ditch all my light frame / scout suit SP to afford the Sentinel SP. Why anyone ran Sentinels pre 1.8 will always be beyond me, Basic Heavies were where it was at. How do sentinels cost more sp now? WE never skilled into sentinel because they were worse than basic pre-1.8. the basic suits cost more so i specced into sentinels to save isk lol
Yeah, but that extra damage mod was worth it for the price, and the amount of SP you save, I only spent 1 point in sentinels because STD basic/sentinel were the same.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:mordiby wrote:Before 1.8 no one had sentinel, and if you did, thats okay, but I did not. And from there I skilled into assault/logi stuff because I had the SP. Alas 1.8 came out making sentinels logi cake, but costing moar SP. Although I love my sentinel, I lost alot of SP on other weapons and equipment that are useless to me now, how sad... If this happened to you, I don't feel bad, because it happend to me. Although empathy is acceptable. Welcome to Dust I guess? Don't get too used to your current fitting. 1.9 or 2.0 (whatever comes first) will change the balancing again. Also SP are never wasted. In the worst case you get more variety.
Yes, if only heavies could use equipment... I ponder that moment.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Sentinel has more low slots
Not pre-1.8 STD sentinel, they had the same module slots, but sentinel cost less, but it goes all crazy after that pre-1.8.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I had to ditch all my light frame / scout suit SP to afford the Sentinel SP. Why anyone ran Sentinels pre 1.8 will always be beyond me, Basic Heavies were where it was at. ???? 4 low slots & 25% heavy weapon reload speed didn't sound good to you? 2 High slots for damage mods, who needs a reload speed bonus when you kill everything in sight? Basic heavies were far superior to pre 1.8 Sentinels. Damage mods on the hmg is useless
Pre-1.8 they were awesome.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I had to ditch all my light frame / scout suit SP to afford the Sentinel SP. Why anyone ran Sentinels pre 1.8 will always be beyond me, Basic Heavies were where it was at. ???? 4 low slots & 25% heavy weapon reload speed didn't sound good to you? Actually it was 2% per level...
And if you wanted 2% per level for that, that just tells me you think its okay to shoot forever, and then retaliate 1 second later, but your reloading. A good heavy reloads before conflict, not during.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
78
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Lets see Rep and hp>short ttk and the hmg was powerful enough
Well, as I said, it was okay to skill into sentinel pre-1.8, but I did not. Did not like the bonuses back then.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
mordiby
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
81
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
V1RONXSS wrote:mordiby wrote:Before 1.8 no one had sentinel, and if you did, thats okay, but I did not. And from there I skilled into assault/logi stuff because I had the SP. Alas 1.8 came out making sentinels logi cake, but costing moar SP. Although I love my sentinel, I lost alot of SP on other weapons and equipment that are useless to me now, how sad... If this happened to you, I don't feel bad, because it happend to me. Although empathy is acceptable. Mostly becose the game is still fresh, still many tools/modules not released. Would like to see also remote schield reps? But its will not work with current passive regen, active shield booster maybe.. Also would like to see any alternative to HMG. Hopefully on the FF CCP will share theyr plans and give more intel. Im bitching sometimes but still prefer the Dust over other fps anyways. Art, concept, atmosphere (though i enjoed closed beta more, those crasy missile havs ;) ) Will see.
Yes, to true, still beta.
Also another heavy weapon, I got the weapon for you, heavy tesla coil gun.
Director of G.R.A.V.E
Logi cake here!
|
|
|
|
|