|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
89
   |
Posted - 2014.04.21 17:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
500hp per second =
No damage from small turret (low DPS)
No damage from forge (3s charge time)
No damage from SL (clip sizes and flying time)
Low damage from large rail (0.75s per shot, 1200damage, 5 shot to CD, 1200*4-1200(shield)=3600(400armor left but reped 500*3=1500, so no way to get it)
Plc? Ur joking
Only way to get a rep madly is missile and re, while rep tank can fit a booster to run from REs and missiles, so GG
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
90
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 17:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Someone did the math and one person with an Ishy Assault Forge Gun and max skills can take out a repping Maddy with just one clip.
Don't forget that the Maddy also probably has max skills to achieve such a high rep rate. Three MLT reps gives you only 300hp/s without any skills.
Ya but he also said that the tank can FLY AWAY with a booster or just kill the forgegunner
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
92
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 17:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lunatic Kota wrote:Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying.
Shut up DNS if cause you get no problem with it you is the one doing it!
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
92
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 17:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Wait till FG bugs are fixed...
It is not about the forge bug but low DPS for reping muddy of forge and kind of nerf of AVG
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
92
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 18:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:thomas mak wrote:Lunatic Kota wrote:Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Shut up DNS of cause you get no problem with it you is the one doing it! What does his DNS tags have to do with anything?
Ppl said DNS's ppl proto spam and fit Caldira guns on Gallenete tanks
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
93
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 18:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Supernus Gigas wrote:If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV.
That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down.
The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits.
It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities.
A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem.
Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
thomas mak
The Nether Dragon
93
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 18:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Supernus Gigas wrote:thomas mak wrote:Supernus Gigas wrote:If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV.
That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down.
The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits.
It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities.
A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things Removed or not introduced things? What the hell are you talking about? Last time I checked Railguns and Large Missiles are primarily for AV and do infact currently exist within the game. And Tanks have weak spot in the rear between the treads.
Surely tank don't have a weak spot at least not in beta
Rail is a large sniper rife used for one shot a sniper and missile is a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx
The Nether Dragon
ya I am the CEO
and a pilot
|
|
|
| |
|