DUST Search - Nerf the reping maddy

thomas mak wrote:

Supernus Gigas wrote:

thomas mak wrote:

Supernus Gigas wrote:

If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV.

That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down.

The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits.

It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities.

A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem.

Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things

Removed or not introduced things?

What the hell are you talking about?

Last time I checked Railguns and Large Missiles are primarily for AV and do infact currently exist within the game.

And Tanks have weak spot in the rear between the treads.

Surely tank don't have a weak spot at least not in beta
Rail is a large sniper rife used for one shot a sniper and missile is a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 89	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:27:00 - [1] - Quote 500hp per second = No damage from small turret (low DPS) No damage from forge (3s charge time) No damage from SL (clip sizes and flying time) Low damage from large rail (0.75s per shot, 1200damage, 5 shot to CD, 12004-1200(shield)=3600(400armor left but reped 5003=1500, so no way to get it) Plc? Ur joking Only way to get a rep madly is missile and re, while rep tank can fit a booster to run from REs and missiles, so GG *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Nirwanda Vaughns 426th Infantry 595	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:35:00 - [2] - Quote just make the reppers active modules again, yeah peopel will stack and rotate them but then at least only one will effectivly be runnign at once. such a simple fix Rolling with the punches
Awesome Pantaloons Lokapalas. 458	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:35:00 - [3] - Quote You forget the RepMad's greatest weakness: teamwork. Yes, each of those things individually can not defeat said tank. 2-3 of any or all of them can make fairly short work of any tank. Also, orbitals. That is all. "The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited." -The Code of Demeanor
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2599	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:38:00 - [4] - Quote Awesome Pantaloons wrote: You forget the RepMad's greatest weakness: teamwork. Yes, each of those things individually can not defeat said tank. 2-3 of any or all of them can make fairly short work of any tank. Also, orbitals. That is all. Please don't ever do algebra. If it absolutely undeniably requires teamwork then it's broken. Unless your a Computer Scientist don't tell me how Game Mechanics Work. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1623	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:39:00 - [5] - Quote Someone did the math and one person with an Ishy Assault Forge Gun and max skills can take out a repping Maddy with just one clip. Don't forget that the Maddy also probably has max skills to achieve such a high rep rate. Three MLT reps gives you only 300hp/s without any skills. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
jerrmy12 kahoalii Proficiency V. 1083	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:41:00 - [6] - Quote thomas mak wrote: 500hp per second = No damage from small turret (low DPS) No damage from forge (3s charge time) No damage from SL (clip sizes and flying time) Low damage from large rail (0.75s per shot, 1200damage, 5 shot to CD, 12004-1200(shield)=3600(400armor left but reped 5003=1500, so no way to get it) Plc? Ur joking Only way to get a rep madly is missile and re, while rep tank can fit a booster to run from REs and missiles, so GG Yup it needs nerfing bad I <3 girl gamers Tears, sweet delicious tears
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 12998	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:44:00 - [7] - Quote It's sad when people start to defend their solo platform that rapes infantry and can only reliably be taken out with a high alpha rail tank or coordinated teamwork. Nerf passive reps, reintroduce activated reps. My Music Videos & Fan Fiction Anti-Social Solo Merc
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 90	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:47:00 - [8] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Someone did the math and one person with an Ishy Assault Forge Gun and max skills can take out a repping Maddy with just one clip. Don't forget that the Maddy also probably has max skills to achieve such a high rep rate. Three MLT reps gives you only 300hp/s without any skills. Ya but he also said that the tank can FLY AWAY with a booster or just kill the forgegunner *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Lunatic Kota TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 148	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:51:00 - [9] - Quote Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly. -David Hackworth
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1623	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:53:00 - [10] - Quote thomas mak wrote: Harpyja wrote: Someone did the math and one person with an Ishy Assault Forge Gun and max skills can take out a repping Maddy with just one clip. Don't forget that the Maddy also probably has max skills to achieve such a high rep rate. Three MLT reps gives you only 300hp/s without any skills. Ya but he also said that the tank can FLY AWAY with a booster or just kill the forgegunner Well that's just a problem with the booster. I do find it ridiculous that it allows me to achieve top speed much faster than it does without the booster. In EVE, it takes you about the same amount of time to achieve top speed with or without an afterburner. Dust shouldn't be an exception where boosters let you go from 0 to top speed much faster than without a booster. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32

Boot Booter Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 520	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:53:00 - [11] - Quote Agreed these things are ridiculous. In my opinion all tanks should receive higher HP but much lower regen. If they take large amounts of damage they should need to retreat for some time. It'd be like a heavy Dropsuit having an armor rep of 50 hp/s. SMG Specialist
NAV HIV The Generals General Tso's Alliance 1521	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:55:00 - [12] - Quote Wait till FG bugs are fixed...
Ander Thedas Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 520	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:56:00 - [13] - Quote Lunatic Kota wrote: Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Nonsense being the cavalcade of frustrated players on the enemy team that just continually try to unsuccessfully eliminate the enemy threat and can't do anything about it? Yeah, their multiple opinions don't merit a response compared to yours. Omnia mutantur nihil interit FW lvl10 reward
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 92	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:57:00 - [14] - Quote Lunatic Kota wrote: Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Shut up DNS if cause you get no problem with it you is the one doing it! *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Nirwanda Vaughns 426th Infantry 595	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:58:00 - [15] - Quote also atm its a bit hard to see if the hardener changes worked or not seeign as the forge gun is glitched. earlier i did manage to take down a couple mlt shield tanks but to be honest by the look of the way teh guys were driving them they really didn't have much of a clue how to use a tank. my bet was they saw all the posts about tanks being op and decided thats where all thier 3x sp was going and they failed terribly lol Rolling with the punches
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 92	Posted - 2014.04.21 17:58:00 - [16] - Quote NAV HIV wrote: Wait till FG bugs are fixed... It is not about the forge bug but low DPS for reping muddy of forge and kind of nerf of AVG *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 7051	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:01:00 - [17] - Quote Lunatic Kota wrote: Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Color me surprised, but maybe HAVs aren't designed to take barrages of nonsense 24/7? CCP's vehicle philosophy is "Waves of Opportunity". Hardeners were nerfed because they negated the "Wave" and allowed for near invulnerability 24/7; Tripple Rep Madrugars are next. HAV > Infantry > AV < HAV [s]Text[/s] <------ That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 7051	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:02:00 - [18] - Quote thomas mak wrote: Lunatic Kota wrote: Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Shut up DNS of cause you get no problem with it you is the one doing it! What does his DNS tags have to do with anything? HAV > Infantry > AV < HAV [s]Text[/s] <------ That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 92	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:05:00 - [19] - Quote Atiim wrote: thomas mak wrote: Lunatic Kota wrote: Cry more FFS. It's the only build that can last through barrage after barrage of none sense. If the fix hardners then yes by all means do something about the reps but until then, stop crying. Shut up DNS of cause you get no problem with it you is the one doing it! What does his DNS tags have to do with anything? Ppl said DNS's ppl proto spam and fit Caldira guns on Gallenete tanks *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 779	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:20:00 - [20] - Quote If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV. That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down. The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits. It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities. A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. *FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!*

thomas mak The Nether Dragon 93	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:25:00 - [21] - Quote Supernus Gigas wrote: If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV. That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down. The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits. It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities. A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 779	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:31:00 - [22] - Quote thomas mak wrote: Supernus Gigas wrote: If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV. That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down. The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits. It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities. A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things Removed or not introduced things? What the hell are you talking about? Last time I checked Railguns and Large Missiles are primarily for AV and do infact currently exist within the game. And Tanks have weak spot in the rear between the treads. *FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!*
thomas mak The Nether Dragon 93	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:38:00 - [23] - Quote Supernus Gigas wrote: thomas mak wrote: Supernus Gigas wrote: If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV. That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down. The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits. It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities. A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things Removed or not introduced things? What the hell are you talking about? Last time I checked Railguns and Large Missiles are primarily for AV and do infact currently exist within the game. And Tanks have weak spot in the rear between the treads. Surely tank don't have a weak spot at least not in beta Rail is a large sniper rife used for one shot a sniper and missile is a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx *The Nether Dragon* ya I am the CEO and a pilot
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 779	Posted - 2014.04.21 18:48:00 - [24] - Quote thomas mak wrote: Supernus Gigas wrote: thomas mak wrote: Supernus Gigas wrote: If you get behind it with an assault FG and shoot it's weak spot it goes down in two to three shots depending on how accurate you are. You can also use the other two AV turrets(Rails and Missiles) to take it out easily. Cuz you know, that's what they're for. AV. That being said, I am in no way defending the current rep stacking. It's completely ridiculous and definitely needs to be toned down. The fact that infantry AV struggles the most against this specific fitting is bad because this fitting absolutely rapes infantry while even the most heavily AV invested players have great difficulty taking it out compared to other tank fits. It's not that big of a deal if AV has a bit of trouble taking out a Missile or Rail tank(even if they are rep staking) because they don't pose a massive threat to infantry like the Blaster does. Rails and Missiles are meant for AV and are lacklustre in their AI capabilities. A triple rep Blaster tank can dish out the most damage to infantry while also being extremely resilient to infantry AV at all times, and that is a huge problem. Weak spot? AV turret? How you even think about those removed or even not introed things Removed or not introduced things? What the hell are you talking about? Last time I checked Railguns and Large Missiles are primarily for AV and do infact currently exist within the game. And Tanks have weak spot in the rear between the treads. Surely tank don't have a weak spot at least not in beta Rail is a large sniper rife used for one shot a sniper and missile is a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx You're an idiot. Tanks have a weak spot. Go in game, aim at a tank between the rear treads, watch the efficiency % increase. Damage modded Railguns can ** up pretty much any tank fitting. Missiles absolutely the ever living out of armor tanks. That 500 HP/s Armor Regen doesn't mean jack when Damage modded Missiles take you out in two seconds flat. FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!**


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page