That's what I've been hearing and is why I'm hesitant to comment, I don't care for DNS but I dislike cheating or bugs

I am not saying KEQ had anything to do with it this time. We both got an attack in, (presumably) they filed a petition, and CCP (presumably) removed one of the attacks. That is fine. But there are deeper implications for the process as a whole, and questions that need to be addressed before I can speak further on the matter.

then nothing happened.

Key part.

And no, I am not paying anyone, anything. If he doesn't want to help resolve this issue that is up to him.

KEQ's district is a little less clear cut, and we have it under full attack now anyway.

We had an attack canceled on them the other day, because of stacked attack on their district(presumably). I need more information to give comment on CCP's role in this. I have a ticket open for that as well.

I am not saying KEQ had anything to do with it this time. We both got an attack in, (presumably) they filed a petition, and CCP (presumably) removed one of the attacks. That is fine. But there are deeper implications for the process as a whole, and questions that need to be addressed before I can speak further on the matter.

If they didn't file a petition, would he issue still have been addressed?
Past issue with this fun and exciting mechanic tell me that, no, the issue would not be addressed. The last battle to finish would be the one that counts.
I have heard also that they remove the last battle when addressing this issue. KEQ could shed some light on this.

If this is the case, it is possible to avoid attack nearly 100% of the time via the petition system. If the early attack is the enemy attack, let it play out, the match doesn't count anyway. If the late attack is the enemy attack, file a petition and get it removed.

I am not saying KEQ intentionally did this, or that this is the exact method CCP uses to determine which attack to cancel.
However, if that IS the method CCP uses, it is as flawed as the broken mechanic that causes it in the first place. If a GM is acting outside of CCP policy on this issue, he needs to be referred to Internal Affairs.

Mostly speculation, simply because I can't get a response from CCP. But these are the two issues we are being faced with in PC right now. It looks an awful lot like intervention, but I can't say for sure until I get an answer out of CCP.

97.5 with more coming, by the way.

Is there a reason why PX1 no showed tonight?
"Disconnects" again?

I blame hippies

If there's any respect in this game that should be given, it's to those that continue to oppose DNS.
Kind of reminds me of the 300 movie but who in DNS do you think best fits Xerxes in this analogy?

Examples:
Spero: "But I am a generous god. I can make you rich beyond all measure. I will make you warlord of all Greece. You will carry my battle standard to the heart of Europa. Your Athenian rivals will kneel at your feet if you will but kneel at mine. "
Rampage: "It isn't wise to stand against me, Leonidas. Imagine what horrible fate awaits my enemies when I would gladly kill any of my own men for victory."


Even if no one else thinks this is funny, I do.

The famous capsuleer Marth Young sent a telegram to the jove. The jove decided to give PX1 the district, because Px1 members couldn't connect to the MCC defending our district.

It's at 97 again, to much excitement for me.

Your so luck that noob said that I couldn't bully anymore...