Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
R2DeepThroat
The Gutter Phenomenon
55
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 16:42:00 -
[271] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote:DaNizzle4shizle wrote:Gildart Lightray wrote:KaoticKrusader wrote:Here's my take in all of this I do believe the Miami Heats will make it to the finals again due to the weak Eastern conference. The team I have coming out of the Western playoffs is Okc Thunders. I believe they are clicking and also made the biggest impression thus far in the playoffs. I ain't got time for sports with so much DUST to play! did you at least watch battle between St. louis and Montreal last night? Canadiens are going down! The Senators will find a way to win the playoff this year (without even being in them :[ )
My Avalanche will find a way to make it to the finals with Patrick Roy at the helm! Hopefully... lol |
CR4SH OVERRIDE
135
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 16:50:00 -
[272] - Quote
Redwings for life...
Shhhh. it's a secret.
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4352
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 17:12:00 -
[273] - Quote
Derrith Erador wrote:CRUSADER2134 wrote:The Attorney General wrote:CRUSADER2134 wrote:You're really gonna sit there and tell Roman he sucks at eve because he flies tackle or Ewar ships? I guess our Logi pilots are useless too huh?
Do you even war room bro? it's an Eve thing, you wouldn't understand. And this is an FA thing, you wouldn't understand either.
I'll stick with Rock thank you
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
719
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 17:16:00 -
[274] - Quote
demens grimwulff wrote:In b4 someone points out the majority of your team was ringers
oops... I just did. Don't blame people for calling in ringers when 10 out of your 16 was ringers.
Lol you beat me to it!
FYI, DARK LEGION is still one of the very few and very rare corporations that uses almost 100% of its own members!
Newb
|
Poncho Polous
The Phoenix Federation
235
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 17:51:00 -
[275] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this?
How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it.
I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception.
CEO The Phoenix Federation
''DDB chooses AE!
throws pokeball
AE uses Super Ringer Attack!
It's super effective!!!''
|
noob cavman
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
1280
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 17:56:00 -
[276] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:In b4 someone points out the majority of your team was ringers
oops... I just did. Don't blame people for calling in ringers when 10 out of your 16 was ringers. Lol you beat me to it! FYI, DARK LEGION is still one of the very few and very rare corporations that uses almost 100% of its own members!
That and you guys are fun as hell to fight against
I want to be a caveman!
Ccp: DENIED YOU DRUNK
Gö+GöüGö+ n+¦pâ+(`-ö´)n+ën+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Jollys quirky inconsistent sidekick.
dem spandex yo
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4357
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 18:18:00 -
[277] - Quote
This thread has exceeded all of my expectations
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
Roy Ventus
Axis of Chaos
1680
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 18:19:00 -
[278] - Quote
My mom can beat up your dad
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
http://royventus.tumblr.com
|
21yrOld Knight
Pradox XVI Proficiency V.
796
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 18:26:00 -
[279] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception.
Why would any one want to stop posting here?
This is a PR master piece!
Mike Ruan Said I was Dust Famous
General John Ripper Said I was Dust Famous
Who else thinks I'm Famous?
|
Roman837
Dem Durrty Boyz Dirt Nap Squad.
254
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 20:04:00 -
[280] - Quote
"How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it.
I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception.[/quote]
WHAT??? You have NEVER brought 16 TPF, just stop man. We all know what your really mad about. Yes, Planet fight club will be restored...and yes you will more then likely be given a district. Then, when someone big and bad attacks you, you WILL call in for help. ******* Hipocrit.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Characters, Julius Romulus Liskus, Cesar Sousa
|
|
Palatinate
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
456
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 20:05:00 -
[281] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception. TPF and FA should have some matches against each other, would be interesting to see how it turns out since y'all are stronger than DDB.
"Hiding will be seen as an act of aggression!" - Battlefield 3
Me: lol what?
Fatal Absolution Director #10
|
Poncho Polous
The Phoenix Federation
236
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 20:57:00 -
[282] - Quote
Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception. TPF and FA should have some matches against each other, would be interesting to see how it turns out since y'all are stronger than DDB. We have done so several times, in fact it was one of those 16 TPF vs dns victories we brought up earlier (you won many more than we did, but we did take a win with 16 TPF from FA). FA is a good learning experience for us, we'll always enjoy our battles with you.
CEO The Phoenix Federation
''DDB chooses AE!
throws pokeball
AE uses Super Ringer Attack!
It's super effective!!!''
|
Poncho Polous
The Phoenix Federation
236
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 20:59:00 -
[283] - Quote
Roman837 wrote:
"How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it.
I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception.
WHAT??? You have NEVER brought 16 TPF, just stop man. We all know what your really mad about. Yes, Planet fight club will be restored...and yes you will more then likely be given a district. Then, when someone big and bad attacks you, you WILL call in for help. ******* Hipocrit.[/quote]
Stop replying man. You've already done more damage to your corps name in here than I could have ever DREAMED of accomplishing with one thread. The ammount of times we've attacked with 16 TPF vs DNS is higher than you can count, IDK why you would even spit out such a stupid comment as TPF has never attacked with 16.
CEO The Phoenix Federation
''DDB chooses AE!
throws pokeball
AE uses Super Ringer Attack!
It's super effective!!!''
|
21yrOld Knight
Pradox XVI Proficiency V.
797
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 21:03:00 -
[284] - Quote
You used ringers! Nu-uh you used ringers. Nuuuuu you used ringers. Nuuuu you used ringers.
That is literally the politics on this thread.
Mike Ruan Said I was Dust Famous
General John Ripper Said I was Dust Famous
Who else thinks I'm Famous?
|
Roman837
Dem Durrty Boyz Dirt Nap Squad.
254
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 21:22:00 -
[285] - Quote
21yrOld Knight wrote:You used ringers! Nu-uh you used ringers. Nuuuuu you used ringers. Nuuuu you used ringers.
That is literally the politics on this thread.
Never once have I denied that when the district was in danger of being lost, that we brought in our Alliance. TPF, claims that when they bring in Alliance members, its because they are close friends, yet, when we do, its not fair.
Congrats TPF, You won 2 battles VS DDB. You are obviously now among the most elite corps currently fighting over MH. LOL
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Characters, Julius Romulus Liskus, Cesar Sousa
|
Texas Killionaire
Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad.
172
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 21:43:00 -
[286] - Quote
Poncho, you're missing the point. This alliance wants 100%. We will take and hold it collectively.
You would've do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Don't say you wouldn't.
Thank you for finally leaving our public channel.
If you're not ready to lose, you're not ready to win.
Jello Biafra = God
AQUPI
|
Palatinate
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
459
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 22:21:00 -
[287] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote:Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception. TPF and FA should have some matches against each other, would be interesting to see how it turns out since y'all are stronger than DDB. We have done so several times, in fact it was one of those 16 TPF vs dns victories we brought up earlier (you won many more than we did, but we did take a win with 16 TPF from FA). FA is a good learning experience for us, we'll always enjoy our battles with you. I'm not sure but I think that was the ERA/FA match? If so I wish I was there, TPF has come a long way and against tough odds. You guys are cool in FA's book and I hope we have some matches soon against y'all.
"Hiding will be seen as an act of aggression!" - Battlefield 3
Me: lol what?
Fatal Absolution Director #10
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4361
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 22:54:00 -
[288] - Quote
Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception. TPF and FA should have some matches against each other, would be interesting to see how it turns out since y'all are stronger than DDB. We have done so several times, in fact it was one of those 16 TPF vs dns victories we brought up earlier (you won many more than we did, but we did take a win with 16 TPF from FA). FA is a good learning experience for us, we'll always enjoy our battles with you. I'm not sure but I think that was the ERA/FA match? If so I wish I was there, TPF has come a long way and against tough odds. You guys are cool in FA's book and I hope we have some matches soon against y'all.
Can confirm. 07
See you soon!
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2697
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 01:38:00 -
[289] - Quote
Texas Killionaire wrote:Poncho, you're missing the point. This alliance wants 100%. We will take and hold it collectively.
You would've do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Don't say you wouldn't.
Thank you for finally leaving our public channel. [Archived]
How to Leave PC
|
21yrOld Knight
Pradox XVI Proficiency V.
800
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 01:40:00 -
[290] - Quote
Roman837 wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote:You used ringers! Nu-uh you used ringers. Nuuuuu you used ringers. Nuuuu you used ringers.
That is literally the politics on this thread.
Never once have I denied that when the district was in danger of being lost, that we brought in our Alliance. TPF, claims that when they bring in Alliance members, its because they are close friends, yet, when we do, its not fair. Congrats TPF, You won 2 battles VS DDB. You are obviously now among the most elite corps currently fighting over MH. LOL
Wasn't specifically attacking you, but i can see your frustration.
You probably understand this, but the main goal of this thread was to make DDB look bad for not being able to support them selves with out a bigger power.
Personally I find that argument childish, because it's saying that one shouldn't use a tool that one has to use to win.
Mike Ruan Said I was Dust Famous
General John Ripper Said I was Dust Famous
Who else thinks I'm Famous?
|
|
Poncho Polous
The Phoenix Federation
236
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 02:07:00 -
[291] - Quote
Texas Killionaire wrote:Poncho, you're missing the point. This alliance wants 100%. We will take and hold it collectively.
You would've do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Don't say you wouldn't.
Thank you for finally leaving our public channel.
I understand the mindset (and to corps like your own that are capable of holding their own, I don't even necessarily disagree with it), and I also understand that those who reside inside of it think that there is no other mindset on this game. I've seen plenty of corps make a mad dash on the starmap and die out because of an inability to hold it, trying to go beyond our reach is not what we desire. For every bit as good as it looks for your corp when you start making a name, it looks twice as bad when someone comes and takes it from you. As a corp I view it more wise to build the group you have until you are confident in your own abilities, putting the fate of my corp and its members in the hands of a political relationship with someone else is not a smart risk in my eyes. So while you may or may not believe me, the entire structure of our corp and how we progress within our own growth is far different from that mentality you mentioned, and I assure you if presented with a bunch of free districts, being told it is our responsibility to lose matches on said districts so as to act as a distraction for the corps in your alliance that actually mean something, we would not be eager to hop on that tip.
I'm confused about the pub chat thing.
CEO The Phoenix Federation
''DDB chooses AE!
throws pokeball
AE uses Super Ringer Attack!
It's super effective!!!''
|
Poncho Polous
The Phoenix Federation
236
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 03:16:00 -
[292] - Quote
Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Palatinate wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Phoenix Federation is talking smack....I like seeing the come-ups :D.
I had to post here because I'm trying to make sense of or understand the logic behind this post. Place this donut thing aside for a sec.....You are insulting DDB for using a team of ringers yet half or more of your team were ringers?? This reminds me of the first time I saw two fat kids cracking jokes about each other and then they started cracking about how fat the other one was.
I understand your feeling behind DDB calling a full team of AE to save the district. But I'm trying to understand your reasoning behind it being different than half or more than half of your team being ringers. And then you guys say, "WE are stronger now than YOU" but DDB brought 16 and you guys brought 8 or less. How can you say this? How are so many of you (it's mainly other DNS guys, is it a condition?) getting focused so hard on the one part that you entirely miss the point of this thread? We've beaten top teams on occasion in DNS with 16 TPF, just as we've been shown we can EASILY do with DDB, we know we'll be fighting AE regardless if they're one of the powerhouses in DNS so its not like we're looking to (or thinking we could) avoid them. The part that we're laughing at here is the fact that they did try to show up with 16 DDB. When they were under the impression they might win they come full stacked, but the second a legitimate threat roles up and you're a littttle low on clones, the entire corp is NOWHERE to be found, not even ALLOWED to enter their own battlefield by the order of their superiors, who have as little faith in them to win the match as we did. We've been placing attacks with 16 TPF consistently since the start of this 'war', and will continue to do so, as well as work hand in hand (not C ock in hand, DDB take note) with our alliance, but remember that when we do, on occasion, split an attack with our alliance (and as states earlier in the thread, the 'ringers' that came from our alliance were all members who went from this corp to make that one), we are there for training, when you bring in you're alliance, your not there to bring in your players and learn something, not there to get 2 groups used to playing together once again, its because you are too weak and you know it. I was hoping to stop replying here SOME time ago, so I'm hoping that clears up any misconception. TPF and FA should have some matches against each other, would be interesting to see how it turns out since y'all are stronger than DDB. We have done so several times, in fact it was one of those 16 TPF vs dns victories we brought up earlier (you won many more than we did, but we did take a win with 16 TPF from FA). FA is a good learning experience for us, we'll always enjoy our battles with you. I'm not sure but I think that was the ERA/FA match? If so I wish I was there, TPF has come a long way and against tough odds. You guys are cool in FA's book and I hope we have some matches soon against y'all.
Correct that was the one. Appreciate the work being noticed, I'm sure we'll be seeing more of each other on the battlefield soon enough ;) Not that I need to tell you, but FA are some fierce competitors, and stand as a pillar of mutual respect once the battles are over, even in battles where you guys straight kick our ass we still have a lot of fun with you.
CEO The Phoenix Federation
''DDB chooses AE!
throws pokeball
AE uses Super Ringer Attack!
It's super effective!!!''
|
Texas Killionaire
Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad.
172
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 03:49:00 -
[293] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote:Texas Killionaire wrote:Poncho, you're missing the point. This alliance wants 100%. We will take and hold it collectively.
You would've do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Don't say you wouldn't.
Thank you for finally leaving our public channel. I understand the mindset (and to corps like your own that are capable of holding their own, I don't even necessarily disagree with it), and I also understand that those who reside inside of it think that there is no other mindset on this game. I've seen plenty of corps make a mad dash on the starmap and die out because of an inability to hold it, trying to go beyond our reach is not what we desire. For every bit as good as it looks for your corp when you start making a name, it looks twice as bad when someone comes and takes it from you. As a corp I view it more wise to build the group you have until you are confident in your own abilities, putting the fate of my corp and its members in the hands of a political relationship with someone else is not a smart risk in my eyes. So while you may or may not believe me, the entire structure of our corp and how we progress within our own growth is far different from that mentality you mentioned, and I assure you if presented with a bunch of free districts, being told it is our responsibility to lose matches on said districts so as to act as a distraction for the corps in your alliance that actually mean something, we would not be eager to hop on that tip. I'm confused about the pub chat thing.
A corp is an alliance of individuals working towards the same goal. Some of those individuals play different roles and have different strengths.
When a point needs to be taken, I might not always be the first choice. But if a point needs to be held, my squad is called in.
Lonewolves don't win games. They circle on the outside and feed on scraps.
If you're not ready to lose, you're not ready to win.
Jello Biafra = God
AQUPI
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4368
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 03:56:00 -
[294] - Quote
Poncho Polous wrote: Correct that was the one. Appreciate the work being noticed, I'm sure we'll be seeing more of each other on the battlefield soon enough ;) Not that I need to tell you, but FA are some fierce competitors, and stand as a pillar of mutual respect once the battles are over, even in battles where you guys straight kick our ass we still have a lot of fun with you.
+1 for the signature
I can't believe I hadn't noticed that.
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4369
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 04:01:00 -
[295] - Quote
Texas Killionaire wrote:Poncho Polous wrote:Texas Killionaire wrote:Poncho, you're missing the point. This alliance wants 100%. We will take and hold it collectively.
You would've do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Don't say you wouldn't.
Thank you for finally leaving our public channel. I understand the mindset (and to corps like your own that are capable of holding their own, I don't even necessarily disagree with it), and I also understand that those who reside inside of it think that there is no other mindset on this game. I've seen plenty of corps make a mad dash on the starmap and die out because of an inability to hold it, trying to go beyond our reach is not what we desire. For every bit as good as it looks for your corp when you start making a name, it looks twice as bad when someone comes and takes it from you. As a corp I view it more wise to build the group you have until you are confident in your own abilities, putting the fate of my corp and its members in the hands of a political relationship with someone else is not a smart risk in my eyes. So while you may or may not believe me, the entire structure of our corp and how we progress within our own growth is far different from that mentality you mentioned, and I assure you if presented with a bunch of free districts, being told it is our responsibility to lose matches on said districts so as to act as a distraction for the corps in your alliance that actually mean something, we would not be eager to hop on that tip. I'm confused about the pub chat thing. A corp is an alliance of individuals working towards the same goal. Some of those individuals play different roles and have different strengths. When a point needs to be taken, I might not always be the first choice. But if a point needs to be held, my squad is called in. Lonewolves don't win games. They circle on the outside and feed on scraps.
Best example of this: Home Point defense, and enemy home point attack.
Not everyone has the skills to survive in the onslaught that is "The City" in PC. However, some people make excellent defenders.
A good scout or Assault can hold down homepoint by themselves (with vehicle support). They don't have to be huge slayers, just able to hold their own. The best ones can take on 2 to 3 man squads by themselves until help arrives.
Same goes for home point assault. Some people are just great at offense by themselves. They can force a team to put another person on homepoint, which takes a person away from city.
You don't see these guys pulling huge scores in PC, because they don't fight in the clusterfuck that is City.
But at the same time, they hold just as important of a goal. Holding down city becomes much harder when you have no safe spot to call in vehicles, or when you are forced to defend city in all directions.
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
The Baby Shaker
Dem Durrty Boyz Dirt Nap Squad.
182
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 14:41:00 -
[296] - Quote
So basically you guys are mad that even though our strength has diminished we didn't fall apart. Instead of rebuilding and sticking together we were supposed to do what other corps did, disband and go our own way. We could have said the same ideas to TPF awhile back. Remember when we steamrolled you and all your ringers off our planet after you acquired it from OH and you guys begged us for a truce. You even booted smokethatkush because we told you that we would keep attacking as long as he was a member(hows that for honor and loyalty lmfao) After doing that we decided to play nice and traded you guys for the last district or two, we even rang for you guys multiple times in the past. So before you start spewing all this **** you should at least know your own corps checkered past
Then to top it off your other idea is we are supposed to tell our alliance "screw you and your 100% plan" and lose a district because we want to field all ddb even though they are new or inexperienced. Sorry, but doing what you want against your alliances wishes doesnt work out to well (IO for example). You should pay more attention in history class and you might learn a thing or two about politics and how **** works.
Before anyone starts with the "its a game crap." Yes it is a game, but its controlled by real people with their own agendas and they take it seriously ( wait thats just like most governments lol). Thats why **** that happens in dust reminds people of real moments in history
I'm too drunk to taste this chicken
|
Derrith Erador
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
1601
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 14:48:00 -
[297] - Quote
Wow, I didn't know this thread was still popcorn worthy. Guess I should pop some more, anyone want to do me a solid and sneak in some boxed candy?
The lone monk who traverses the treacherous worlds of New Eden in search of panty dropper songs.
Amarrican to the core.
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
4379
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 15:34:00 -
[298] - Quote
Derrith Erador wrote:Wow, I didn't know this thread was still popcorn worthy. Guess I should pop some more, anyone want to do me a solid and sneak in some boxed candy?
As I said earlier, This thread has exceeded all of my expectations.
Keep it going people. This is the kind of war room I like
I got my cloak and daggers, I'm a very happy Ghost
I hack at Mach V
|
SHOOOOTER
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
174
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 00:56:00 -
[299] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:Derrith Erador wrote:Wow, I didn't know this thread was still popcorn worthy. Guess I should pop some more, anyone want to do me a solid and sneak in some boxed candy? As I said earlier, This thread has exceeded all of my expectations. Keep it going people. This is the kind of war room I like
Can't let this thread slip what happened to that scrub tanker assistant attorney? |
MythTanker
The Phoenix Federation Caps and Mercs
102
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 01:11:00 -
[300] - Quote
Roman837 wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote:You used ringers! Nu-uh you used ringers. Nuuuuu you used ringers. Nuuuu you used ringers.
That is literally the politics on this thread.
Never once have I denied that when the district was in danger of being lost, that we brought in our Alliance. TPF, claims that when they bring in Alliance members, its because they are close friends, yet, when we do, its not fair. Congrats TPF, You won 2 battles VS DDB. You are obviously now among the most elite corps currently fighting over MH. LOL there is a difference in bringing 8 allance members (for a learning experience ) than bringing 15 Aliiance members for the simple fact of what is between the legs of DDB. A vagina
The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his -George S. Patton
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |