|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
2256
   |
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
or they just listened to the plethora of tank whiners.
they definately didn't listen to infantry because we didn't ask for any of this, but I know tankers asked for all of these changes.
- remove red line rails my blaster dies once in awhile. check
- madruger tanks are to survivable my blaster tank can't kill them when they are repping with double hardners. check
sorry if it's not exactly what you tankers wished for maybe you should of been more specific and got a union. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
2256
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:calisk galern wrote:or they just listened to the plethora of tank whiners.
they definately didn't listen to infantry because we didn't ask for any of this, but I know tankers asked for all of these changes.
- remove red line rails my blaster dies once in awhile. check
- madruger tanks are to survivable my blaster tank can't kill them when they are repping with double hardners. check
sorry if it's not exactly what you tankers wished for maybe you should of been more specific and got a union. I'm sure tankers were asking to have their hardeners become next to useless, and I'm sure only tankers complained about redline campers. Your analysis is spot on, second to none: scholarly, if I do say so myself.
infantry wanted av buffed and blasters nerfed, infantry doesn't give a **** about red line rail guns, it's solely a tanker issue thus why it got addressed.
blaster versus blaster tank was silly they just stood their attacking each other while passive reps won the fight, again not an infantry issue their av couldn't kill them either way.
you can deny it all you want the only thing that was addressed were tanker issues. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
2261
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:calisk galern wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:calisk galern wrote:or they just listened to the plethora of tank whiners.
they definately didn't listen to infantry because we didn't ask for any of this, but I know tankers asked for all of these changes.
- remove red line rails my blaster dies once in awhile. check
- madruger tanks are to survivable my blaster tank can't kill them when they are repping with double hardners. check
sorry if it's not exactly what you tankers wished for maybe you should of been more specific and got a union. I'm sure tankers were asking to have their hardeners become next to useless, and I'm sure only tankers complained about redline campers. Your analysis is spot on, second to none: scholarly, if I do say so myself. infantry wanted av buffed and blasters nerfed, infantry doesn't give a **** about red line rail guns, it's solely a tanker issue thus why it got addressed. blaster versus blaster tank was silly they just stood their attacking each other while waiting for the mods to run out and passive reps won it, again not an infantry issue their av couldn't kill them either way. you can deny it all you want the only thing that was addressed were tanker issues, maybe if forge guns weren't nerfed and actually worked they'd enjoy the hardener nerf but that's about the only part that effects infantry. as usual dust fiend shouldn't you of quit already? Did we want our hardeners nerfed? It was infantry who all cried that they couldn't take out tanks, solo. You must engage the tank when the hardener is not online. In the case of the shield tank, you need high alpha *cough*forge*cough* to take out as much shield as you can before the hardener gets kicked in. But then they have little shields left because unlike armor tanks, shield tanks don't have a buffer to safely protect their hardened EHP.
tankers should of known that when ccp does something they usually do collateral damage.
they are the embodiment of "careful what you wish for" i'm just surprised they didn't do more damage ^^
for example when the infantries are begging for scouts to be nerfed, the will probably do something to make sniper rifles worse, I don't know how, but it will happen, always does ^^ |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
2268
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 03:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:calisk galern wrote:or they just listened to the plethora of tank whiners.
they definately didn't listen to infantry because we didn't ask for any of this, but I know tankers asked for all of these changes.
- remove red line rails my blaster dies once in awhile. check
- madruger tanks are to survivable my blaster tank can't kill them when they are repping with double hardners. check
sorry if it's not exactly what you tankers wished for maybe you should of been more specific and got a union. All I believe many tankers have said is "Too much, too fast" smaller steps makes for better balance. Am I also to assume that you are complaining because your blaster tank.....and I am going to assume Sica or Soma can't beat a Maddy? That's how it always should have been.
nope I use rail gun tanks to kill tanks and drop ships, never bothered farming infantry with blasters specced into them enough to use proto-blasters but I look at that as wasted sp, I also am specced into tanks, I choose not to do anything half assed, if i'm going to fight tanks with tanks then I will be on equal footing.
i've squaded with tankers, i've faced tankers, i've been a tanker.
honestly I agree that I probably can't beat someone that's been using tanks for years, but I don't really give them a chance to fight me that way, I drive my tanks like a shotgun scout, and kill you before you get a chance to fight.
not really sure what that has to do with the thread but since you asked. |
|
|
| |
|