|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ROCKO THE HELLHOUND
Ultramarine Corp
33
   |
Posted - 2014.03.27 11:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
BAD CCP!! :)
the hotfix-info about the small Rail Turret (that has never ever been any issue in the way of OP-ness - but instead definitely the other way around for a long long time) HAS to be:
Small Rail Turret: finally delivered the announced and in it's description included blast-damage and radius
AND NOT Small Rail Turret: NERFED Small Rail Turret's range outta giggles!!!
i've specced into level5 Gal. ADS, level5 Small Rail Turret, level5 Small Rail Turret Ammo Capacity and level5 Small Rail Turret at 1.7 day 1 after i testet it's firing style, damage and efficiency versus instalations for a single match (to see if the flaws and bugs it had pre-1.7 were fixed) - but what i could not see like this was that you've forgotten/ messed up the includement of it's blast-damage/ radius it always had before!
so i COMPLETLEY WASTED SOOO MANY MILLION SP on this one as i am penalised to fly my Incubus only with Missile-Turret instead to make any impact on the battle, as with the Small Rail from an ADS out, it's almost impossible to hit ground troopers from above height-levels (not to mention the over abundance of speedy Scouts we have now in 1.8 - the hardest to hit directly from above height-levels)!
so i was waiting for 3 1/2 months now for you to finally fix in 1.8 this embarrassing crap you've done there to my character - but what are you intending to do tomorrow instead? nerfing an aspect of it? ARE YOU FRIGGIN KIDDING ME?
please overthink this one again and deliver any changes to it ONLY together with a fix - or the fix first as it should be! |
ROCKO THE HELLHOUND
Ultramarine Corp
34
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:Have you any idea how high 200m is. that's the height of the MMC. At 300m from a small rail on a dropship enemies barely render. Even at 200m people and vehicles below are small. personally, as a max inki pilot, I can't see too much of an issue
hello there! this thread is NOT about the change of the range of the Small Rail Turret itself (which i personally don't care about either) - but about something very, very different - something that makes me currently sitting here at home, boiling and raging to a degree where i am afraid that i am about to explode RIGHT NOW!!
and that not any DS-Pilot but you entered this thread of mine now, acting like/ mistakenly thinking that it would be about some totally unimportant 100 meters, surely doesn't help here... . |
ROCKO THE HELLHOUND
Ultramarine Corp
35
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
are all of you people completely mad? this thread was ONLY about:
that they have forgotten to include the blast-damage and radius of the Small Rail Turret in 1.7 - while it was announced to stay, is still included in the description of it - and has always been there before 1.7.
so i specced with so many million SP completely into it - just to still need to use the missiles on my Incubus instead to make any impact on the battle, because CCP messed up the includement of this so incredible important part of it outside of pure vehicle-versus-vehicle engagements.
so i am waiting 3 1/2 months for a fix in 1.8 - or just any official reaction, even just any acknowledgement of CCP about the problem that cost me ca. 3, 4, maybe more million SP for nothing - but the first thing i hear about from CCP about the Small Rail Turret after this long time is instead that they nerf a different aspect of it?
this thread is not about any 100 meters range decrease tomorrow i don't care about - this is thread is about how frustrating it is to not get the fixes to something broken i specced so much into, nor even just an official reaction to it - and the first thing you hear from them 3 1/2 months later about it is a "we found a problem in nerfing it - nerfing it tomorrow then" - regardless of how less impact that nerf has, i want my huge SP investment to get fixed first or together with the other change - or even just finally any ETA, reaction, acknowledgement about the issue.
and i think my original post was pretty clear enough about that - but now all you mad people come in here and think (and some even insist on) that i would care about the particular content that was announced for tomorrows change instead, making me write down even more ridiculous walls of text in a last effort to not loose my last remaining bits of sanity over the described situation and your trolling - well, done! i think i exploded now!
bye, bye last remaining bits of my former sanity..., i am now one of you mad people too - feels good by the way, anybody got chips? |
|
|
| |
|