DUST Search - suicide LAVs unfortunately working as intended

All Channels

General Discussions

suicide LAVs unfortunately working as intended

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1953	Posted - 2014.03.26 18:59:00 - [1] - Quote I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Foundation Seldon Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 605	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:00:00 - [2] - Quote I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). Saga v. Methana Balance
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 6203	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:01:00 - [3] - Quote [Archived] The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers" [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Sana Rayya WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men. 1189	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:05:00 - [4] - Quote Do you get extra WP for jihad jeeping now?
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1953	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:49:00 - [5] - Quote Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
J0LLY R0G3R Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad. 661	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:50:00 - [6] - Quote Now it gives more points. XD ++++Gimme Back my SG RoF++++ XD Indeed, chase me friend XD
darkiller240 WarRavens League of Infamy 634	Posted - 2014.03.26 19:52:00 - [7] - Quote Whats wrong with Jhads Its Fun Hard Rewarding And Funny, Even for the tanker "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
Zirzo Valcyn Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire 310	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:00:00 - [8] - Quote darkiller240 wrote: Whats wrong with Jhads Its Fun Hard Rewarding And Funny, Even for the tanker the pre ritual of jihading is also a holy one. there's a special moment when you and another RE'er are loading up multiple lavs with RE. knowing the endeavor will surely end in a cloning there is a moment that you partake in a ritual of sake drinking, a few tears are shed (in game not the forums) and the LAVs speed off into the horzion. how could you nerf something so poetic and beautiful is beyond me. u can ban the troll out of the forums but u can't ban the forums out of the troll. forum warrior .189
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 1017	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:06:00 - [9] - Quote As a tanker, I'm glad that remotes are sticky. Jihad Jeeps are a novel tactic and should be encouraged. The only thing I would change is limit the amount of remotes that can stick to a player owned object. Let's say, 3-5 max. After that, they begin to fall off in the order they were put on. Best PVE idea I've seen. Fixed link.
Rusty Shallows 1266	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:13:00 - [10] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." They were a "surprise" feature we were vaguely told about without any specifics. Also your foresight is better than mine. I recall hearing CCP grumbling about removing the sticky-to-blue feature. Day-one could have been all posts setting fire to the forums.. Then again before Uprising 1.7 I defended it thinking CCP was doing a re-balance. Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>

OliX PRZESMIEWCA Bezimienni... 71	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:15:00 - [11] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." Why in your opinion remotes shouldn't be sticky?
savingpvt Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 7	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:18:00 - [12] - Quote Its kamikaze been part of war since war been around Rams on ships plane crashing into boats. Hell when av no longer works we find other ways to take out tanks. Yes I have kamikaze into tanks. Only when it been tank spam on one side. Tankers get butt hurt because my 20 k lav blows up your 300 k tank. Infantry get butt hurt when there more then 2 tanks on one side. Getting killed when u spawn in by 5 militia tanks. Take out militia tanks And jihads would calm down
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1953	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:46:00 - [13] - Quote darkiller240 wrote: Whats wrong with Jhads Its Fun Hard Rewarding And Funny, Even for the tanker Lol you think jihad jeeps are hard? You probably consider auto aim to be the best thing ever. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11771	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:47:00 - [14] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: darkiller240 wrote: Whats wrong with Jhads Its Fun Hard Rewarding And Funny, Even for the tanker Lol you think jihad jeeps are hard? You probably consider auto aim to be the best thing ever. They may not be hard. But they're harder than coasting around in a nigh-invulnerable death machine. Keep demanding CCP remove your counters, Spkr. Hey, maybe one day you'll actually break that 100/0 you've always wanted! You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 2739	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:48:00 - [15] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: darkiller240 wrote: Whats wrong with Jhads Its Fun Hard Rewarding And Funny, Even for the tanker Lol you think jihad jeeps are hard? You probably consider auto aim to be the best thing ever. Drives a tank Says other people use easy mode Face palm I'll start my own war, with hookers, and blackjack! In fact forget the war and the blackjack.
BrownEye1129 Death In Xcess Corporation 175	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:54:00 - [16] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. LOL LOL LOL seriously vehicles are broke. HAVs/DS are invincible to infrantryyou AV if you use dual hardeners. They need reworked get over it. My proto AV geared suit should be able to AT LEAST drop a MLT Tank to below 25% HP with one clip. Too fast and too strong.
Foundation Seldon Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 605	Posted - 2014.03.26 20:59:00 - [17] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. Talk about insecurity, I never even mentioned a tank nerf and suddenly I'm accused of being a rifle touting assault. It's okay though Spkr, just get all the frustration out now while you can. I've only mentioned that CCP has already confirmed that they're going to be tweaking the current state of tank balance. Just accept it. Saga v. Methana Balance
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1953	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:36:00 - [18] - Quote BrownEye1129 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. LOL LOL LOL seriously vehicles are broke. HAVs/DS are invincible to infrantryyou AV if you use dual hardeners. They need reworked get over it. My proto AV geared suit should be able to AT LEAST drop a MLT Tank to below 25% HP with one clip. Too fast and too strong. You don't know the damage a single rail tank can do to the enemy's tanks, do you, probably because you've never tried it yourself, and I bet you're one of those people firing their rifle at a tank, hoping to destroy it. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 3701	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:37:00 - [19] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. GTFO No.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 12624	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:37:00 - [20] - Quote The only reason they're even remotely a "problem" is because the turret rotation skill isn't applying to turrets. If it were, and you couldn't track a bomb truck and kill it before it hit you, then you're nothing short of bad. I am the worst tanker in DUST and I avoid / kill them frequently "It seems you've mistaken me for someone who cares"

al nize mk2 DUST University Ivy League 50	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:39:00 - [21] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." I'm with the jihadists on this... How can you possibly want suicide jeeps to be nerfed out of existence - it's a real tactic, it's in game and it's incredibly good fun. Not to mention escapeable if you are the target. It's a great tactic for average SP players to use and I suspect you don't like it because it levels the playing field somewhat! GÇ£All that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football.GÇ¥
Louis Domi Pradox One Proficiency V. 131	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:46:00 - [22] - Quote Once killed a jihad jeep... I got about 200 wp just from equipments destroyed... It took a good 20 sec for all the notifications to be done
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1954	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:50:00 - [23] - Quote al nize mk2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." I'm with the jihadists on this... How can you possibly want suicide jeeps to be nerfed out of existence - it's a real tactic, it's in game and it's incredibly good fun. Not to mention escapeable if you are the target. It's a great tactic for average SP players to use and I suspect you don't like it because it levels the playing field somewhat! I respect someone when they have the gonads to leave the redline with a MLT tank, railgun and damage mods to try to destroy me, rather than someone with instant 10,000 worth of alpha damage. It's an incredibly cheap tactic and find it no fun. It's like Code 9 / Code Magic on old SOCOM. I find no enjoyment out of using cheap tactics. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Bojo The Mighty L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 3653	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:51:00 - [24] - Quote You refuse to see the use of the stick aside from lavs You would destroy a city of innocents for the sake of killing one bad man
dreth longbow Bank of DUST 514 41	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:56:00 - [25] - Quote BrownEye1129 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. LOL LOL LOL seriously vehicles are broke. HAVs/DS are invincible to infrantryyou AV if you use dual hardeners. They need reworked get over it. My proto AV geared suit should be able to AT LEAST drop a MLT Tank to below 25% HP with one clip. Too fast and too strong. I hope you have a forge and are not thinking that a light gun should hurt a tank?
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 12627	Posted - 2014.03.27 17:59:00 - [26] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: al nize mk2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I knew with absolute certainty that sticky remotes weren't a "bug" per se. I knew that they weren't going to be "fixed." I'm with the jihadists on this... How can you possibly want suicide jeeps to be nerfed out of existence - it's a real tactic, it's in game and it's incredibly good fun. Not to mention escapeable if you are the target. It's a great tactic for average SP players to use and I suspect you don't like it because it levels the playing field somewhat! I respect someone when they have the gonads to leave the redline with a MLT tank, railgun and damage mods to try to destroy me, rather than someone with instant 10,000 worth of alpha damage. It's an incredibly cheap tactic and find it no fun. It's like Code 9 / Code Magic on old SOCOM. I find no enjoyment out of using cheap tactics. Stacks damage mods on a railgun from the redline, gets mad at people using cheap tactics. Bomb trucks aren't hard to counter, especially if the turret rotation skill was applying to turrets. "It seems you've mistaken me for someone who cares"
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 2745	Posted - 2014.03.27 18:03:00 - [27] - Quote I just want to point out in one of your other threads on the main page right now you are crying that us infantry couldnt adapt to tanks but right here you are whining about a tactic infantry developed to counter OP tanks thus adapting to the situation So, which is it? I'll start my own war, with hookers, and blackjack! In fact forget the war and the blackjack.
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 428	Posted - 2014.03.27 18:06:00 - [28] - Quote Who wants to tell him hardeners are nerfed and rail turret ranges are cut in half? If you don't understand politics or pulling triggers, I have no use for you.
Henchmen21 Planet Express LLC 811	Posted - 2014.03.27 18:25:00 - [29] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: BrownEye1129 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Foundation Seldon wrote: I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. LOL LOL LOL seriously vehicles are broke. HAVs/DS are invincible to infrantryyou AV if you use dual hardeners. They need reworked get over it. My proto AV geared suit should be able to AT LEAST drop a MLT Tank to below 25% HP with one clip. Too fast and too strong. You don't know the damage a single rail tank can do to the enemy's tanks, do you, probably because you've never tried it yourself, and I bet you're one of those people firing their rifle at a tank, hoping to destroy it. Never scored very high in reading comprehension did you? CCP you better nail 1.8, as it stands 1.7 is a total disaster. Henchmen21: Infantry Gotyougood Ufkr: Vehicles
Dauth Jenkins Ultramarine Corp 321	Posted - 2014.03.27 19:50:00 - [30] - Quote Henchmen21 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: BrownEye1129 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: [quote=Foundation Seldon]I wouldn't take them not being changed in 1.8 as proof positive that they're working as intended or not. I'd just note that no one from CCP has mentioned them in the context of any sort of hotfix or change (unlike tanks). There's little to nothing to change about tanks. Stop asking for something to be nerfed because your rifle can't kill it. LOL LOL LOL seriously vehicles are broke. HAVs/DS are invincible to infrantryyou AV if you use dual hardeners. They need reworked get over it. My proto AV geared suit should be able to AT LEAST drop a MLT Tank to below 25% HP with one clip. Too fast and too strong. You don't know the damage a single rail tank can do to the enemy's tanks, do you, probably because you've never tried it yourself, and I bet you're one of those people firing their rifle at a tank, hoping to destroy it. Actually, I do know how much damage rail tanks can do.... they completely dominate the entire map, and make it impossible to fly dropships, or, on some maps, pull out vehicles. (As a side note, people need to distinguish between support dropships, and assault dropships) Sees prototompers... Sees blueberries start to snipe... Pulls out commando suit with laser rifle and swarm launcher...



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.