| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Beef Supreme 4
WEKILLING JOY
15
   |
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just asking. |
Joel II X
Dah Gods O Bacon
1773
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's not whether it's balanced or not. It's whether they can fit. And yes, they can.
However, Gallente Research Facility sucks for sniping so that socket isn't balanced much. It's balanced for everything else, though. If it was 24v24 I'd say it would work better because it would put players outside more trying to cap the other objectives.
Herp. |
Beef Supreme 4
WEKILLING JOY
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:It's not whether it's balanced or not. It's whether they can fit. And yes, they can.
However, Gallente Research Facility sucks for sniping so that socket isn't balanced much. It's balanced for everything else, though. If it was 24v24 I'd say it would work better because it would put players outside more trying to cap the other objectives.
Herp.
I was just asking because I remember either a video or a devblog stating that the maps were designed with 48 players as the reference. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core
599
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
God no,24players treading to a objective in a open field isnt balance.
maps need more cover
A strange game.
The only winning move is
not to play.
GalHeav E-vo
|
JIMvc2
UNREAL WARRIORS
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:God no,24players treading to a objective in a open field isnt balance.
maps need more cover
I agree but It would be much better. More players = tanks, LAV,and dropships wouldn't last as long.
If you run proto gear, prepare to suffer the consequences. You've been warned.
|
Kigurosaka Laaksonen
DUST University
Ivy League
676
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 22:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:God no,24players treading to a objective in a open field isnt balance.
maps need more cover
Maybe you need to not walk through the open fields. Take a LAV, HAV, or dropship. If you insist on walking, take the long way.
DUST 514 Recruit Code - https://dust514.com/recruit/zluCyb/
EVE Buddy Invite - Too damn long. Ask me for it.
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
5189
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 23:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:God no,24players treading to a objective in a open field isnt balance.
maps need more cover Maybe you need to not walk through the open fields. Take a LAV, HAV, or dropship. If you insist on walking, take the long way.
To be fair these maps are incredibly open.
CCP even recognized it.
They said that they can't add in more structures because they can't optimize it right. So really good, diverse maps won't come out until PS4.
For now we have these bland, open terrain maps with some urban sockets.
1st Official Role Playing Gallente Asshole -Title Awarded by True Adamance
|
sebastian the huds
Legions of Infinite Dominion
Zero-Day
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 23:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Make skirm 24 v 24, keep the 16 v 16 for dom, and make ambush 12 v 12.
There you go, balanced game modes.
If you only see from your point of view, you are doing it wrong.
|
Byozuma Kegawa
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
177
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 23:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
What we really need is 18v18. Ever since they raised the squad cap to 6 we've been having this 'short bus' squad bringing up the rear in organized play. A small group that had to balance the roles more harshly than the other two full squads. Raising the match cap to 18 would allow three full squads giving a better team dynamic. At least, that's my take on it. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Endless Hatred
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
4402
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 23:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
We need more objectives if we're going to have 24v24, and I still don't trust the community with that.
It's still probably going to end up with 40 dumbasses zerging the same point and complaining about frame rate issues, no matter the map size.
I am your scan error.
|
|
|
Outer Raven
WarRavens
League of Infamy
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 04:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:It's not whether it's balanced or not. It's whether they can fit. And yes, they can.
However, Gallente Research Facility sucks for sniping so that socket isn't balanced much. It's balanced for everything else, though. If it was 24v24 I'd say it would work better because it would put players outside more trying to cap the other objectives.
Herp.
Gallente Research Facility was literally their first attempt at an anti sniper map  but yes the maps could definitely work in a 24 vs 24 format or more if they could ever pull it off.
___-öGûêGûêGêƒ________________
GûêGûêGûêGòÜGûêa»½GòáGûê Gûæ Gûæ Gûæ Gûæ Gûæ Gûæ Gûæ GûÆ PEW
¯¯GùÑGò¥GûêGûêGùñ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |