Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Egonz4
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
93
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad?
MASTER OF THE FLAYLOCK
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
2044
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad?
So then make the AR a side arm.
And the cookie crumbles.
For the Federation!
|
Egonz4
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
93
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Im not saying that...its just that smgs' IRL are similar to an AR except it has a higher rate of fire with less damage
MASTER OF THE FLAYLOCK
|
Derpty Derp
It's All Gone Derp
124
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
You can't really argue that giving the SMALL machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD. |
Derpty Derp
It's All Gone Derp
124
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Im not saying that...its just that smgs' IRL are similar to an AR except it has a higher rate of fire with less damage
This could just be the Dust level of grammar, but are you saying that in real life an SMG's bullet will do less damage than an assault rifle bullet? |
Egonz4
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
93
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Egonz4 wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Im not saying that...its just that smgs' IRL are similar to an AR except it has a higher rate of fire with less damage This could just be the Dust level of grammar, but are you saying that in real life an SMG's bullet will do less damage than an assault rifle bullet? hahahahahaha yes...yes i am
MASTER OF THE FLAYLOCK
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
2045
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Im not saying that...its just that smgs' IRL are similar to an AR except it has a higher rate of fire with less damage
yeah and an Assault rifle can pick off targets at very long ranges, I don't think an SMG can do that in rl (aside from some) but this isn't real life so ignore that.
In most FPS the SMGs usually have slightly higher DPS or better hipfire abilities and speed multipliers. While ARs have way longer range. Also in Most FPS games an SMG is a main gun, except for older FPS games. Therefore no as long as an SMG is a sidearm it should not be equal to an AR, and definitely not as long as the long range to short range weapon balance is so... unexistant.
For the Federation!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
11083
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yeah, sure. Sidearms should be competitive with the plasma rifle. But certainly not with the combat, rail, or scrambler rifles.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
2048
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Yeah, sure. Sidearms should be competitive with the plasma rifle. But certainly not with the combat, rail, or scrambler rifles.
This makes perfect sense.
For the Federation!
|
axis alpha
Red Star. EoN.
254
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Stop crying magsec with be very weak against shields.
We won't follow the deceiver.
You let this be your warning.
The path of the wretched is burning..
|
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1869
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:You can't really argue that giving the SUB machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD.
fixed
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1869
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
axis alpha wrote:Stop crying magsec with be very weak against shields.
................ what?
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Endless Hatred Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
4357
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
We need to think of the SMGs as more of micro-SMGs, not something the size of an MP5.
However, I believe sidearms as a whole should be able to compete with light weapons under the right circumstances. Higher turn speed, and whatnot.
Because realistically, you won't want to be swinging around a long rifle when the guy you're fighting is an arm's length away.
I am your scan error.
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
2053
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:27:00 -
[14] - Quote
axis alpha wrote:Stop crying magsec with be very weak against shields.
Oh yeah no wonder the RR has such high DPS still, because it will be weak against shield! Silly me!
For the Federation!
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3477
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 01:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Im not saying that...its just that smgs' IRL are similar to an AR except it has a higher rate of fire with less damage
Yeah, and IRL AV is a OHK from a mile away, we don't respawn when we die, and Natalie Portman isn't my wife.
No.
|
Louis Domi
Pradox One Proficiency V.
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
mix the mag sec and the min smg and that would be a smg, min's damage and rof, magsec's range which i think is just a little below the AR( i dont know the ar range ._.) |
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn
3445
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Upcoming nerf request threads inbound.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
Are you OUKH?
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles.
Why? It does more damage than the SMG. There needs to be a limit somewhere.
Cookie repaired. Use common sense.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:22:00 -
[19] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:You can't really argue that giving the SMALL machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD.
I swear everyone that plays Dust has to be a kid the grew up in the 00's.
You call that balance when a heavy with 1500+ HP instantly kills someone from 30+ meters away who was using an SMG? And I repeat - instantly. Dude. An HMG does a tremendous amount of damage and kills instantly. An SMG does a small amount of damage and takes forever to kill one on one. Even if you get the drop on your enemy, you will often lose if they have a better weapon, which they will.
You clearly haven't specced into the SMG. I have. The SMG in this game is nothing like it is in other FPS's. The SMG in this game is weak enough that it could do with more damage OR more effective range. Doesn't need both. It's good, but right now, it's CPU/PG at proto and advanced is not justified whatsoever. It takes so much that you are clearly supposed to be able to main it, but it is not strong enough to stand up to other weapons reliably. I dare you to main the SMG and then talk about how OP it would be to have slightly more range or damage. For christ's sakes...
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
2057
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Why? It does more damage than the SMG. There needs to be a limit somewhere. Cookie repaired. Use common sense.
Why not? The do the same DPS, damage =/= DPS therefore higher damage =/= greater killing potential. Range is the same, dps is the same therefore if the SMG is to behave like the AR then the AR in the light weapon slot is obsolete. Don't tell me to use common sense when you so obviously lack it yourself.
For the Federation!
|
|
DeadlyAztec11
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
4634
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:26:00 -
[21] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Why? It does more damage than the SMG. There needs to be a limit somewhere. Cookie repaired. Use common sense. Why would you make a light weapon that is only slightly better than a sidearm?
The crums are still on the floor.
Taco Cat backwards is still Taco Cat
|
Dexter307
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
1032
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:Derpty Derp wrote:You can't really argue that giving the SMALL machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD. I swear everyone that plays Dust has to be a kid the grew up in the 00's. You call that balance when a heavy with 1500+ HP instantly kills someone from 30+ meters away who was using an SMG? And I repeat - instantly. Dude. An HMG does a tremendous amount of damage and kills instantly. An SMG does a small amount of damage and takes forever to kill one on one. Even if you get the drop on your enemy, you will often lose if they have a better weapon, which they will. You clearly haven't specced into the SMG. I have. The SMG in this game is nothing like it is in other FPS's. The SMG in this game is weak enough that it could do with more damage OR more effective range. Doesn't need both. It's good, but right now, it's CPU/PG at proto and advanced is not justified whatsoever. It takes so much that you are clearly supposed to be able to main it, but it is not strong enough to stand up to other weapons reliably. I dare you to main the SMG and then talk about how OP it would be to have slightly more range or damage. For christ's sakes... Not true, the smg and assult smg shred people at lose range There sidearms so they are supposed to be weaker than light weapons I ran it on my plasma cannon class and it did a great job of taking people out when i had to go into CQC gun fights |
Hynox Xitio
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
430
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
I would like HMG to have the range of the Forge Gun.
Not all ideas are good ideas.
Unleash the Fogwoggler
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:Asher Night wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Why? It does more damage than the SMG. There needs to be a limit somewhere. Cookie repaired. Use common sense. Why not? The do the same DPS, damage =/= DPS therefore higher damage =/= greater killing potential. Range is the same, dps is the same therefore if the SMG is to behave like the AR then the AR in the light weapon slot is obsolete. Don't tell me to use common sense when you so obviously lack it yourself.
Are we talking proto or what? The AR does reliable damage at further ranges - the SMG has to be close. Therefor, from most any range the AR will still be deadlier, as it should be. Use common sense, babby.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Asher Night wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Egonz4 wrote:So everybody is whining (no offense) about the masgec smg. They say its almost as good as the Gallente Blaster rifle, And it should be.....both of the smgs' should be. on every other game people use smgs' as primary weapons, so why is this so bad? So then make the AR a side arm. And the cookie crumbles. Why? It does more damage than the SMG. There needs to be a limit somewhere. Cookie repaired. Use common sense. Why would you make a light weapon that is only slightly better than a sidearm? The crums are still on the floor.
What's better or worse in opinion. In my opinion, the basic AR is far, far superior to the basic SMG. Have you used either.
The crumbs are all over your face.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:42:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dexter307 wrote:Asher Night wrote:Derpty Derp wrote:You can't really argue that giving the SMALL machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD. I swear everyone that plays Dust has to be a kid the grew up in the 00's. You call that balance when a heavy with 1500+ HP instantly kills someone from 30+ meters away who was using an SMG? And I repeat - instantly. Dude. An HMG does a tremendous amount of damage and kills instantly. An SMG does a small amount of damage and takes forever to kill one on one. Even if you get the drop on your enemy, you will often lose if they have a better weapon, which they will. You clearly haven't specced into the SMG. I have. The SMG in this game is nothing like it is in other FPS's. The SMG in this game is weak enough that it could do with more damage OR more effective range. Doesn't need both. It's good, but right now, it's CPU/PG at proto and advanced is not justified whatsoever. It takes so much that you are clearly supposed to be able to main it, but it is not strong enough to stand up to other weapons reliably. I dare you to main the SMG and then talk about how OP it would be to have slightly more range or damage. For christ's sakes... Not true, the smg and assult smg shred people at lose range There sidearms so they are supposed to be weaker than light weapons I ran it on my plasma cannon class and it did a great job of taking people out when i had to go into CQC gun fights
Firstly, I think you mean 'long'. Pretty bad typo. Proof read you sh*t at least a tiny bit. Secondly, 'they're' =/= 'there'. Not trying to be a grammar natzi but the way you convey your message greatly affects it's interpretation and appreciation.
No. They don't. Stop saying things. I've specced into SMG and have the range at level 5. Only the Ishukone does decent damage at a decent range. The rest you have to be fairly close, or be fighting an enemy already with damaged HP. Also, why are you complaining about doing well with the SMG in CQC fights? Do I need to explain it to you? It's a CQC weapon. It did well at the area it was exactly designed for.
If the SMG were so great right now you would see it more than the RR, CR, AR, SR - basically everything else that gets used normally or spammed. I use the SMG all the time and rarely ever run into someone else with it.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
448
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
What i see here is nothing else than racial fight. Our Calari lore is known by powerfull responce on long range. What gallenteans dont like. But question is:"Why people who like our stuff dont agree with our race." If you want profit anywhere (field or market) you should choose the caldari republic. If you play for federation, you can spec in our stuff and use it for your progress. Its simple and meritocratic vision. The simplicity and minimalism is reall progress.
Support - Tactician/Support
Deteis - Orator/Logician
BHD since MAG
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:What i see here is nothing else than racial fight. Our Calari lore is known by powerfull responce on long range. What gallenteans dont like. But question is:"Why people who like our stuff dont agree with our race." If you want profit anywhere (field or market) you should choose the caldari republic. If you play for federation, you can spec in our stuff and use it for your progress. Its simple and meritocratic vision. The simplicity and minimalism is reall progress.
Brother, I don't know what you're saying but don't get in my way or I'll argue with you too.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Dexter307
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
1032
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:Dexter307 wrote:Asher Night wrote:Derpty Derp wrote:You can't really argue that giving the SMALL machine gun enough range to beat a HEAVY machine gun is a good idea... The reason would be balance, which is more important than being more like CoD. I swear everyone that plays Dust has to be a kid the grew up in the 00's. You call that balance when a heavy with 1500+ HP instantly kills someone from 30+ meters away who was using an SMG? And I repeat - instantly. Dude. An HMG does a tremendous amount of damage and kills instantly. An SMG does a small amount of damage and takes forever to kill one on one. Even if you get the drop on your enemy, you will often lose if they have a better weapon, which they will. You clearly haven't specced into the SMG. I have. The SMG in this game is nothing like it is in other FPS's. The SMG in this game is weak enough that it could do with more damage OR more effective range. Doesn't need both. It's good, but right now, it's CPU/PG at proto and advanced is not justified whatsoever. It takes so much that you are clearly supposed to be able to main it, but it is not strong enough to stand up to other weapons reliably. I dare you to main the SMG and then talk about how OP it would be to have slightly more range or damage. For christ's sakes... Not true, the smg and assult smg shred people at lose range There sidearms so they are supposed to be weaker than light weapons I ran it on my plasma cannon class and it did a great job of taking people out when i had to go into CQC gun fights Firstly, I think you mean 'long'. Pretty bad typo. Proof read you sh*t at least a tiny bit. Secondly, 'they're' =/= 'there'. Not trying to be a grammar natzi but the way you convey your message greatly affects it's interpretation and appreciation. No. They don't. Stop saying things. I've specced into SMG and have the range at level 5. Only the Ishukone does decent damage at a decent range. The rest you have to be fairly close, or be fighting an enemy already with damaged HP. Also, why are you complaining about doing well with the SMG in CQC fights? Do I need to explain it to you? It's a CQC weapon. It did well at the area it was exactly designed for. If the SMG were so great right now you would see it more than the RR, CR, AR, SR - basically everything else that gets used normally or spammed. I use the SMG all the time and rarely ever run into someone else with it. Its a sidearm, its not supposed it be as good as a primary. Also im not "complaining" about doing good in cqc, im saying its good at cqc. Also theres no range skill so i dont know what you mean by that, theres operation which is less kick, and sharpshooter which is more accurate hipfire, but there hasent been a range skill since chromosome.
Asher Night wrote:Firstly, I think you mean 'long'. Pretty bad typo. Proof read you sh*t at least a tiny bit. Secondly, 'they're' =/= 'there'. Not trying to be a grammar natzi but the way you convey your message greatly affects it's interpretation and appreciation. Fail, not only is trying to use grammer and spelling as an argument on a video game forum just dumb, but you misspell words trying to do so. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |