Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Virtual Riot
The Vanguardians INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
224
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
It had an infantry remote shield rep tool.
Change them so they can't out tank a tank.
I want to heal Cal Sents.
That is all. |
Foundation Seldon
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
549
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
They need to seriously rework how vehicle based remote modules work but I'm eagerly awaiting their return as well.
Saga v. Methana Balance
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
1137
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
As an LAV enthusiast; no.
Until they balance "stuff" there's no place for more vehicles. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3471
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nerf shield hardeners first.
Or even better, no LogiLAVs.
LogiMAVs.
No.
|
Joey-Number1
Maniacal Miners INC No Safe Haven
68
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think there s a better vehicle space for logis waiting in an MTAC section ;p. |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
1027
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'd rather they just introduce a remote rep module.
If LLAVs become the unkillable LAVs as they were before, then things are gonna suck.
We have enough people jumping in and out of LAVs without reintroducing LLAVs, particularly now that no one uses AV grenades or swarms anymore. |
Foundation Seldon
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
549
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Nerf shield hardeners first.
Or even better, no LogiLAVs.
LogiMAVs.
Shield Hardeners aren't very good on LAVs to begin with, the Saga's base health is too low so if its caught unaware at any time then the Hardener's made more or less useless. I don't see any problem with adding Logi LAVs so long as they don't give them the insane innate resistance they had pre-1.7.
Rasatsu wrote:As an LAV enthusiast; no.
Until they balance "stuff" there's no place for more vehicles.
?
Outside of the Baloch/Methana which probably has a tad too much base health all they'd need to do really is buff AV grenade base damage and fix the progression of Swarms.
Saga v. Methana Balance
|
NotWhoYou ThinkEyeAm
Expert Intervention Caldari State
51
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
If you're going to bring them back, then take away their huge resistance.
Even with Proto Swarms before 1.7, they were nearly impossible to kill (at least the Charybdis was).
45 player match
I'm obviously not who you think I am
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1548
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
No, make the LAV a scout vehicle with teo variants (scan and cloak). Save the logi role for the MAVs (mobile supply depot and repper variants). That would be cooler GÇö each vehicle type have it's own role rather than the same variant for each type vehicle.
Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!
|
Foundation Seldon
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
549
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:No, make the LAV a scout vehicle with teo variants (scan and cloak). Save the logi role for the MAVs (mobile supply depot and repper variants). That would be cooler GÇö each vehicle type have it's own role rather than the same variant for each type vehicle.
I'd rather not wait a year and a half for a ground based logi vehicle.
Saga v. Methana Balance
|
|
Skihids
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
3043
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 21:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Joey-Number1 wrote:I think there s a better vehicle space for logis waiting in an MTAC section ;p.
Those will just be swarm bait. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |