DUST Search - Why was this all changed?

All Channels

General Discussions

Why was this all changed?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution 4981	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:10:00 - [1] - Quote http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
CommanderBolt ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION 970	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:15:00 - [2] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? While I will admit some things are better now.... Look at that mini map! That's so much better than what we have right now!. The cool hacking terminals look futuristic and cool too. The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. In some way it seems like as DUST has took steps forwards, it has really took steps back too. Join our public channel - ACME SPECIAL FORCES PUB For the STATE!
Vulcanus Lightbringer Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 320	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:22:00 - [3] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. This.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5423	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:22:00 - [4] - Quote Dumbfire Swarms! Why CCP? Why did you remove them? lolPLC [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 7224	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:37:00 - [5] - Quote The map looks so much better too Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. DUST514514
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 306	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:09:00 - [6] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? Oh boyo i really miss that times Everything seemed new and ground breaking, now its just MeeEEEeeeH. Everything is downgraded, not bright colors, just crapy flat palete. And what is funny all that in Unreal Engine, just sad story about optimalization. Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:16:00 - [7] - Quote Dat screen tearing. That actual variety in terrain design. That seemingly sane terrain interaction. That **** gunplay. The graphics are definitely much better and much more detailled, but also far** less polished. That RDV looks pretty goofy, compared to the awesome effects that we currently have for aircraft. The map seems huge, but that might be due to how the player is approaching it. I hope that later versions will bring some of the positive aspects back.
Mad Syringe ReDust Inc. 158	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:30:00 - [8] - Quote Actually attacking an outpost ant moving the MCC... this is what skirmish should be like... What we are doing now is not defend and attac, but two teams conquering.... stupid...
Shadow Archeus OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 312	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:33:00 - [9] - Quote I want skirmish 1.0 back......there was a lot that was wrong but there was a lot that felt right as well Real heavies use lasers
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2857	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:47:00 - [10] - Quote Gameplay>Graphics Intelligence is OP

crazy space 1 GunFall Mobilization 2195	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:51:00 - [11] - Quote Vote for me in CSM1 if you want it back. We need the bobbing HUD it is the most important missing feature. The shifting redlines, matches with a single MCC for more balanced PC gameplay and variety. This is not a pipe dream I played this game I want CCP to bring back on my PS3. They need to bring the game back on track the core is done... I mean I don't hate CCP they need to have all the racial suits before anyone takes them seriously. Don't you remember the marketing? AAA shooter? That was with the bobbing HUD... The hype for vita app being days away? We need people like me grounding CCP to their original view.
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution 4987	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:54:00 - [12] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
spoony moon Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 33	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:56:00 - [13] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics I'm sorry but skirmish 1.0 was better gameplay. Tactical orbital turret drops. Little bases would be created like you were plaing an RTS. I want my RTS back : (
crazy space 1 GunFall Mobilization 2195	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:57:00 - [14] - Quote Sole Fenychs wrote: Dat screen tearing. That actual variety in terrain design. That seemingly sane terrain interaction. That **** gunplay. Automatic turrets that actually participate in the fight. The graphics are definitely much better and much more detailled, but also far** less polished. That RDV looks pretty goofy, compared to the Probably Slightly Less Boring Than Working effects that we currently have for aircraft. The map seems huge, but that might be due to how the player is approaching it. I hope that later versions will bring some of the positive aspects back. Just to let you know in a lot of ways it's was terrible. You could not drive the LAV it was impossible. But you could get a good 3v3 tank battle going on while people fight over the ground base.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 659	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:05:00 - [15] - Quote Many of the older gameplay was scrapped because the game was literally scrapping some of the old, chunky PS3 systems. Knight Soiaire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? You will ALWAYS have to choose between the two when it comes to online games. Frankly any game that can produce better gameplay than graphics will eventually update their graphics later on the road, but games that focus on creating highly detailed graphics almost never improve their gameplay down the road. Optical stimulus vs Mental stimulus You have to choose if you're a crow led by the eyeball to the next "shiny" or a thinker who wants to interact with a new and exiting world. If you can read this, it means you are reading. Unless you are skimming
Akdhar Saif Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative 383	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:08:00 - [16] - Quote That "Establishing Uplink" loading screen.
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 4533	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:09:00 - [17] - Quote I miss the FOV we had before they "improved" the graphics. Funny how people are looking back and wishing the graphics looked that good when we supposedly got an upgrade coming into Uprising.
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:09:00 - [18] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: Just to let you know in a lot of ways it's was terrible. You could not drive the LAV it was impossible. But you could get a good 3v3 tank battle going on while people fight over the ground base. The framerate also looks pretty broken. Dust 514 will be an objectively good game when it's developed so far that LAV combat is actually viable and dynamic, instead of that stop and go and gunner death thing that is currently going on. @Graphics: Graphics and gameplay do not clash. What clashes is graphic fidelity and gameplay. A good art direction can offset graphics that are bad on a technical level. Also, graphics can directly impact the gameplay. 60FPS, 1080p, higher FOV and an art direction that allows easy visibility of targets (Which is already the case) are all things that make the game more fun to play and allow the gameplay to be better.
DootDoot Da Short Buss 206	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:10:00 - [19] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: While I will admit some things are better now.... Look at that mini map! That's so much better than what we have right now!. The cool hacking terminals look futuristic and cool too. The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. In some way it seems like as DUST has took steps forwards, it has really took steps back too. What things are better now? Frame rates? Lag? Balance? Matchmaking? Game speed with that running! Structures? Only thing i can see somewhat better is CCP introduced better Graphics lighting and texture packs... Which drastically hurt game performance. And added a couple guns and suits to the game. While removing more modules and vehicles then they added by double. So what has gotten better? i'm confused.? Oh that 78k SP was because it was beta... CCP handed out alot of SP so we could get to end game quicker and test the complete game... Also a Huge reason why New Player Experience got such little attention.
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 307	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:11:00 - [20] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Proper work and Progress > False lies and Promises Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG

Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1920	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:13:00 - [21] - Quote I recognize part of the maps, but what game is this? Some things: Good: Head bopping Minimap NULLSEC! Skirmish 1.0 Camera Scope on the weapon Bad: The AR sounds like a plastic toy gun Hacking seems to take forever Shiny Dropsuits Camera Scope while looking through it Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
DootDoot Da Short Buss 206	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:18:00 - [22] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: I recognize part of the maps, but what game is this? Some things: Good: Head bopping Minimap NULLSEC! Skirmish 1.0 Camera Scope on the weapon Bad: The AR sounds like a plastic toy gun Hacking seems to take forever Shiny Dropsuits Camera Scope while looking through it Your bad's are alot of peoples pluses... AR sound was awesome. Hacking should be an active longer process... Like GTA 5... not run up and hold your button..... Thats what everyone asked for in beta... we got a quicker run up and press your button and only in one spot! Shinny dropsuits got traded for shinny ground and wall textures... Which make picking out a dropsuit amoungst reflective dirt?!... a pain in the ass.. [*] Everyone wants proper futuristic scopes... What we have now is barely the technology the 3rd world military's have for scopes.
Kierkegaard Soren Forsaken Immortals Top Men. 252	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:44:00 - [23] - Quote Wow. That music. And the plasma bursts on impact. And that minimap! I never played any of the earlier builds, but they look so...distinctive. Very different beast to what we have now. I noticed the bit detection was a little ****** in that video though. Dedicated Commando. "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." -Paul Atreides.
ads alt 117	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:46:00 - [24] - Quote Kierkegaard Soren wrote: Wow. That music. And the plasma bursts on impact. And that minimap! I never played any of the earlier builds, but they look so...distinctive. Very different beast to what we have now. I noticed the bit detection was a little ****** in that video though. I only played ambush so I didnt see the minimap or anything 1.8 will release...
Mobius Wyvern Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 4705	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:49:00 - [25] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? The SP was so high because they jacked it up for testing. In the early Beta you could haul in 240k SP in one match easily. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 817	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:57:00 - [26] - Quote Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Best PVE idea I've seen.
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 309	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:03:00 - [27] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Just Bshate honestly, look on other games like AC, Mirrors Edge, Motorstorm, GTA V, Infamous, TLoU and tell me, do you really accept their words?! NOPE they just dont know how to properly optimize engine waht they chosed, nothing else Support* - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
The Robot Devil Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1904	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:04:00 - [28] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: The hype for vita app being days away? . "You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus." Raoul Duke
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2859	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:05:00 - [29] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? Yes Frankly CCP should have told the community to **** off and CCP develop how they wanted to Vehicles have gone through about 2 full changes, infantry at least 4 i think and half the mods and weapons for both playstyles have been changed so much Intelligence is OP
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:12:00 - [30] - Quote Sam Tektzby wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Just Bshate honestly, look on other games like AC, Mirrors Edge, Motorstorm, GTA V, Infamous, TLoU and tell me, do you really accept their words?! NOPE they just dont know how to properly optimize engine waht they chosed, nothing else They completely broke the graphics in Mirror's Edge. Look at the PC version for what it's supposed* to look like. All AC games have horrible PS3 ports with extreme screen tearing and freezes. InFamous is far less busy in terms of what it requires of the hardware. Especially the collision model/environmental interaction is a joke. Dunno about TLoU, but Uncharted was done by programming wizards. Those same people did Crash Bandicoot and wrote a blog about the kind of hacks they used to make 3D run on the PS1. They are geniuses in that regard. CCP does not have that kind of skilled console developers.

Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 4533	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:19:00 - [31] - Quote Sam Tektzby wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Just B*shate honestly, look on other games like AC, Mirrors Edge, Motorstorm, GTA V, Infamous, TLoU and tell me, do you really accept their words?! NOPE they just dont know how to properly optimize engine waht they chosed, nothing else Use MULTIPLAYER examples. And use examples of games in Unreal Engine, not random whatever. AC? Every game I know that uses the abbreviation (Armored Core, Ace Combat, Assassin's Creed, Animal Crossing) runs on a proprietary engine, not UE3. If you're talking multiplayer and that limits it to Ace Combat or Assassin's Creed, the netcode in both is horrendous. Try Transformers: War for Cybertron and Fall of Cybertron. They have smaller battles and maps than DUST, but they have more mobile characters, higher speeds, smoother animations, better graphics, wider FOV and less lag even though they're not running on servers.
Proto Annihilator Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 23	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:23:00 - [32] - Quote Sole Fenychs wrote: Dat screen tearing. That actual variety in terrain design. That seemingly sane terrain interaction. That **** gunplay. Automatic turrets that actually participate in the fight. The graphics are definitely much better and much more detailled, but also far** less polished. That RDV looks pretty goofy, compared to the awesome effects that we currently have for aircraft. The map seems huge, but that might be due to how the player is approaching it. I hope that later versions will bring some of the positive aspects back. like smashing my vehicle and dropping it from massive heights. Oh and using it as a yo-yo.
sabre prime The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 138	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:29:00 - [33] - Quote Some epically long TTK in that video. Desperate attempt to get BPOs
Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens League of Infamy 689	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:04:00 - [34] - Quote I didn't play in closed beta so I won't pretend to know anything from first hand experience. Head bob is interesting but it gives me a head ache watching it. Mini-Map is hard to say. Having it is nice but not having it means someone has to pay more attention to the game. I go either or on that one. Muzzle flash is weird. I think it is less messy without it. The installations are hit or miss. Null Cannon looked more like a cannon rather than some weird pillar-box thing. The Large Blasters gave cover as well as giving suppressive fire. Certainly different and more powerful but better is hard to say.* Hacking animation is pretty cool. Sad to see that didn't transfer over... Small installations definitely should have stayed and kept the ability to offer cover like a bunker.* Every time I see old Skirmish games, I wonder why the idea was scrapped. Rush is entirely different than King of the Hill. If they wanted King of the Hill, why wasn't it added rather than replacing a completely different mode? When it comes to the * I made, I guess the blasters were changed because the game modes are no longer really Attacker attacks and Defenders defends. I REALLY don't know why Rush-Skirmish is gone. Looked like it would be have been fun. And that music is pretty kick ass.
Christiphoros von Poe Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 187	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:18:00 - [35] - Quote I was there. That was the only map available for Skirm 1.0. Assault rifles could outshoot a sniper if they wanted to, because there was no dispersion. Also the hit detection was terrible.. And I mean terrible.. But it was fun. I believe they changed the sound of the assault rifle because so many people complained that it didn't sound real enough. Dumb fire swarms were everywhere also.. Nothing like getting blown up from some guy camping on one of those plateaus. Yeah... The game seems incredibly different now that I think about it.. And of I wrote a list then I am sure it would be too long. (1) "Exile" Assault Rifle reserved for: Fire of Prometheus Uprising->Replication->E3->Codex->Chromosome->Uprising->???
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution 4997	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:20:00 - [36] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Head bob is interesting but it gives me a head ache watching it. You usually have the option to turn it off in other games, or you'd get a slider to adjust how much it bobs. ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
Sinboto Simmons SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance 4910	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:26:00 - [37] - Quote I miss so much of the stuff in early beta. Sinboto - The True Blood Minja Forum Warrior level 4 STB-Infantry (Demolition)
ads alt 126	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:07:00 - [38] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? reserved 1.8 will release...
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 1811	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:17:00 - [39] - Quote WTT: Lobby shooter I struggle to justify playing in exchange for the shooter found in video. Kill PC and reclaim all wealth it has generated before it damages the game even further Closed Beta Bittervet Bomber
Stefan Stahl Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 450	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:33:00 - [40] - Quote Notice how nanohives didn't refill grenades back then and you had to be really careful about when to throw them. Seems impossible to convince CCP to undo this these days.

Auris Lionesse Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance 394	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:52:00 - [41] - Quote What game is this? The map looks cool, the camera sight on that gun is awesome and gatdam at that miniap and the HUD effects. Is this 2023? Why dont we have this now? In for dev response...
Scheneighnay McBob Hammerhead i Eagle Thrust 4239	Posted - 2014.03.08 23:19:00 - [42] - Quote Holy ****, I haven't even played that early (dat map) Still brings back memories, because it's not too different than when I started playing in july that year I am your scan error.
Scheneighnay McBob Hammerhead i Eagle Thrust 4239	Posted - 2014.03.08 23:22:00 - [43] - Quote Auris Lionesse wrote: What game is this? The map looks cool, the camera sight on that gun is awesome and gatdam at that miniap and the HUD effects. Is this 2023? Why dont we have this now? In for dev response... Players whined for iron-sights, so it got taken away. I am your scan error.
Scheneighnay McBob Hammerhead i Eagle Thrust 4239	Posted - 2014.03.08 23:39:00 - [44] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. Still didn't sound like a weapon I am your scan error.
Scheneighnay McBob Hammerhead i Eagle Thrust 4239	Posted - 2014.03.08 23:47:00 - [45] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Head bob is interesting but it gives me a head ache watching it. Speaking of headaches- playing on an SD resolution before Replication? Have fun with that. Something I often forget was that playing Dust would give me the worst headaches because the text was meant for HD. I'm playing in HD now, but that was still hellish. I am your scan error.
Auris Lionesse Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance 394	Posted - 2014.03.09 00:05:00 - [46] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: What game is this? The map looks cool, the camera sight on that gun is awesome and gatdam at that miniap and the HUD effects. Is this 2023? Why dont we have this now? In for dev response... Players whined for iron-sights, so it got taken away. Your joking right? It's 30,000ad we should have something more advanced than ironsights. Where's a dev. this is what long weapons need to have not crappy acog sights.
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 232	Posted - 2014.03.09 08:29:00 - [47] - Quote Auris Lionesse wrote: Your joking right? It's 30,000ad we should have something more advanced than ironsights. Where's a dev. this is what long weapons need to have not crappy acog sights. We should also be flying around with jetpacks and having powered armor with infinite stamina and jump capability to scale walls. Please don't use the realism argument. The scope mechanics are supposed to add fun/variety to the game.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 13320	Posted - 2014.03.09 09:07:00 - [48] - Quote Auris Lionesse wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: What game is this? The map looks cool, the camera sight on that gun is awesome and gatdam at that miniap and the HUD effects. Is this 2023? Why dont we have this now? In for dev response... Players whined for iron-sights, so it got taken away. Your joking right? It's 30,000ad we should have something more advanced than ironsights. Where's a dev. this is what long weapons need to have not crappy acog sights. Ironsights work when electronics are busted. Lore wise? The old camera scopes where remote hackable and where removed from the product until they are electronically hardened enough. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Auris Lionesse Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance 400	Posted - 2014.03.09 09:43:00 - [49] - Quote Sole Fenychs wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: Your joking right? It's 30,000ad we should have something more advanced than ironsights. Where's a dev. this is what long weapons need to have not crappy acog sights. We should also be flying around with jetpacks and having powered armor with infinite stamina and jump capability to scale walls. Please don't use the realism argument. The scope mechanics are supposed to add fun/variety to the game. It has nothing to do with realism, Its not really 30,000 it's 2014 The "scope mechanics" we have now aren't adding any fun or variety. Only two weapons with decent sights are smg and mass driver. Not sure what variety your talking about.
Auris Lionesse Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance 400	Posted - 2014.03.09 09:46:00 - [50] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: What game is this? The map looks cool, the camera sight on that gun is awesome and gatdam at that miniap and the HUD effects. Is this 2023? Why dont we have this now? In for dev response... Players whined for iron-sights, so it got taken away. Your joking right? It's 30,000ad we should have something more advanced than ironsights. Where's a dev. this is what long weapons need to have not crappy acog sights. Ironsights work when electronics are busted. Lore wise? The old camera scopes where remote hackable and where removed from the product until they are electronically hardened enough. But there's no way to damage sites as it currently stands. There has to be a real reason that was taken off. I've heard there were canasta sights but that's the first time I've seen them. Thats such a huge step back.

NoExsplosionsMgee The Vanguardians INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 153	Posted - 2014.03.09 10:36:00 - [51] - Quote What exactly was the reason for removing those little yellow holograms(in the beginning of the video) of buildings and MCC's that was on the war table in the lobby? I thought those holograms looked cool as hell. :( a¦á__a¦¦a¦â
Meee One The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 473	Posted - 2014.03.09 11:12:00 - [52] - Quote Dem bunker turrets. Also,4k+ shields/armor! Only users lose drugs. Time wounds all heels.
RemingtonBeaver Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 199	Posted - 2014.03.09 11:57:00 - [53] - Quote Things I liked: The music sounded 1980s sci-fi. I dig it...a lot. That lady's voice is soooo much better."Destroy all defence relays." "Virus uploaded"...even sounds more 1980s sci-fi! Uplink Established! That map had excellent cover and seemed huge. Hack animations on the consoles. Minimap superiority. TTK (maybe a bit too long though) Where is THAT game mode? Things I didn't like: It looked terrible. The players looked like they were travelling on an air hockey table. Those installations looked super dumb. TTK...okay it was too long. No hack animation for the player. The spawns seemed to be horrible. Sidenote: Camera scope? That sounds like the bees knees. Any chance of it coming back? We can pickle that.
Obodiah Garro Tech Guard RISE of LEGION 807	Posted - 2014.03.09 13:10:00 - [54] - Quote Damn I miss the Rush map, still not a gameplay mode option and was clearly Dust at its best Nemo me impune lacessit
Warbot Titan X lNSURGENCY 0	Posted - 2014.03.09 15:46:00 - [55] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? The nostalgia! Great memories. I remember pulling my hair out quite a lot because they wouldn't die. That's one thing I don't miss. I do miss my scout strafe and bunny hopping. Closed Beta Veteran - lNSURGENCY
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 4536	Posted - 2014.03.09 21:55:00 - [56] - Quote Warbot Titan X wrote: I remember pulling my hair out quite a lot because they wouldn't die. That's one thing I don't miss. That could get frustrating, yeah. Quote: I do miss my scout strafe and bunny hopping. ...and making OTHER people tear their hair out because YOU don't die instead of the other way around. Yeah, even though I was with you on that, I don't really miss it so much.
Roy Ventus Axis of Chaos 1292	Posted - 2014.03.09 21:58:00 - [57] - Quote You hear that A.I. voice? Mmh..Mhmm I would eat her taco... If she had a taco... "There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all." Roy Ventus
Kane Fyea 2625	Posted - 2014.03.09 22:06:00 - [58] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? 1. People complained abbout the hud bobbing I believe 2. I dont know why they removed the minimap :( 3. I'm not real bothered by the changing of the muzzle flash 4. I personally like the models for them now better 5. This was probably done to help improve the stability of the game 6. I'm not sure why they removed those 7. That amount of SP was given because we were only allowed to play on weekends so we didn't have too much time to gain SP. Also to allow us to use more things faster.
Christiphoros von Poe Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 189	Posted - 2014.03.09 23:28:00 - [59] - Quote The memories that video has brought me. Although, that assault rifle was pretty crazy. I remember the forum was full of posts like this: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=119044#post119044 It was funny to me. Also, lol: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19063 (1) "Exile" Assault Rifle reserved for: Fire of Prometheus Uprising->Replication->E3->Codex->Chromosome->Uprising->???


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.