DUST Search - Why was this all changed?

All Channels

General Discussions

Why was this all changed?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution 4981	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:10:00 - [1] - Quote http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
CommanderBolt ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION 970	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:15:00 - [2] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? While I will admit some things are better now.... Look at that mini map! That's so much better than what we have right now!. The cool hacking terminals look futuristic and cool too. The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. In some way it seems like as DUST has took steps forwards, it has really took steps back too. Join our public channel - ACME SPECIAL FORCES PUB For the STATE!
Vulcanus Lightbringer Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 320	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:22:00 - [3] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. This.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5423	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:22:00 - [4] - Quote Dumbfire Swarms! Why CCP? Why did you remove them? lolPLC [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 7224	Posted - 2014.03.08 15:37:00 - [5] - Quote The map looks so much better too Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. DUST514514
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 306	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:09:00 - [6] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? Oh boyo i really miss that times Everything seemed new and ground breaking, now its just MeeEEEeeeH. Everything is downgraded, not bright colors, just crapy flat palete. And what is funny all that in Unreal Engine, just sad story about optimalization. Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:16:00 - [7] - Quote Dat screen tearing. That actual variety in terrain design. That seemingly sane terrain interaction. That **** gunplay. The graphics are definitely much better and much more detailled, but also far** less polished. That RDV looks pretty goofy, compared to the awesome effects that we currently have for aircraft. The map seems huge, but that might be due to how the player is approaching it. I hope that later versions will bring some of the positive aspects back.
Mad Syringe ReDust Inc. 158	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:30:00 - [8] - Quote Actually attacking an outpost ant moving the MCC... this is what skirmish should be like... What we are doing now is not defend and attac, but two teams conquering.... stupid...
Shadow Archeus OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 312	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:33:00 - [9] - Quote I want skirmish 1.0 back......there was a lot that was wrong but there was a lot that felt right as well Real heavies use lasers
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2857	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:47:00 - [10] - Quote Gameplay>Graphics Intelligence is OP

crazy space 1 GunFall Mobilization 2195	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:51:00 - [11] - Quote Vote for me in CSM1 if you want it back. We need the bobbing HUD it is the most important missing feature. The shifting redlines, matches with a single MCC for more balanced PC gameplay and variety. This is not a pipe dream I played this game I want CCP to bring back on my PS3. They need to bring the game back on track the core is done... I mean I don't hate CCP they need to have all the racial suits before anyone takes them seriously. Don't you remember the marketing? AAA shooter? That was with the bobbing HUD... The hype for vita app being days away? We need people like me grounding CCP to their original view.
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution 4987	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:54:00 - [12] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
spoony moon Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 33	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:56:00 - [13] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics I'm sorry but skirmish 1.0 was better gameplay. Tactical orbital turret drops. Little bases would be created like you were plaing an RTS. I want my RTS back : (
crazy space 1 GunFall Mobilization 2195	Posted - 2014.03.08 16:57:00 - [14] - Quote Sole Fenychs wrote: Dat screen tearing. That actual variety in terrain design. That seemingly sane terrain interaction. That **** gunplay. Automatic turrets that actually participate in the fight. The graphics are definitely much better and much more detailled, but also far** less polished. That RDV looks pretty goofy, compared to the Probably Slightly Less Boring Than Working effects that we currently have for aircraft. The map seems huge, but that might be due to how the player is approaching it. I hope that later versions will bring some of the positive aspects back. Just to let you know in a lot of ways it's was terrible. You could not drive the LAV it was impossible. But you could get a good 3v3 tank battle going on while people fight over the ground base.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 659	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:05:00 - [15] - Quote Many of the older gameplay was scrapped because the game was literally scrapping some of the old, chunky PS3 systems. Knight Soiaire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? You will ALWAYS have to choose between the two when it comes to online games. Frankly any game that can produce better gameplay than graphics will eventually update their graphics later on the road, but games that focus on creating highly detailed graphics almost never improve their gameplay down the road. Optical stimulus vs Mental stimulus You have to choose if you're a crow led by the eyeball to the next "shiny" or a thinker who wants to interact with a new and exiting world. If you can read this, it means you are reading. Unless you are skimming
Akdhar Saif Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative 383	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:08:00 - [16] - Quote That "Establishing Uplink" loading screen.
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 4533	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:09:00 - [17] - Quote I miss the FOV we had before they "improved" the graphics. Funny how people are looking back and wishing the graphics looked that good when we supposedly got an upgrade coming into Uprising.
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:09:00 - [18] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: Just to let you know in a lot of ways it's was terrible. You could not drive the LAV it was impossible. But you could get a good 3v3 tank battle going on while people fight over the ground base. The framerate also looks pretty broken. Dust 514 will be an objectively good game when it's developed so far that LAV combat is actually viable and dynamic, instead of that stop and go and gunner death thing that is currently going on. @Graphics: Graphics and gameplay do not clash. What clashes is graphic fidelity and gameplay. A good art direction can offset graphics that are bad on a technical level. Also, graphics can directly impact the gameplay. 60FPS, 1080p, higher FOV and an art direction that allows easy visibility of targets (Which is already the case) are all things that make the game more fun to play and allow the gameplay to be better.
DootDoot Da Short Buss 206	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:10:00 - [19] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: While I will admit some things are better now.... Look at that mini map! That's so much better than what we have right now!. The cool hacking terminals look futuristic and cool too. The GEK sounds more like a weapon instead of a wet fart also. In some way it seems like as DUST has took steps forwards, it has really took steps back too. What things are better now? Frame rates? Lag? Balance? Matchmaking? Game speed with that running! Structures? Only thing i can see somewhat better is CCP introduced better Graphics lighting and texture packs... Which drastically hurt game performance. And added a couple guns and suits to the game. While removing more modules and vehicles then they added by double. So what has gotten better? i'm confused.? Oh that 78k SP was because it was beta... CCP handed out alot of SP so we could get to end game quicker and test the complete game... Also a Huge reason why New Player Experience got such little attention.
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 307	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:11:00 - [20] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Proper work and Progress > False lies and Promises Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG

Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1920	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:13:00 - [21] - Quote I recognize part of the maps, but what game is this? Some things: Good: Head bopping Minimap NULLSEC! Skirmish 1.0 Camera Scope on the weapon Bad: The AR sounds like a plastic toy gun Hacking seems to take forever Shiny Dropsuits Camera Scope while looking through it Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
DootDoot Da Short Buss 206	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:18:00 - [22] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: I recognize part of the maps, but what game is this? Some things: Good: Head bopping Minimap NULLSEC! Skirmish 1.0 Camera Scope on the weapon Bad: The AR sounds like a plastic toy gun Hacking seems to take forever Shiny Dropsuits Camera Scope while looking through it Your bad's are alot of peoples pluses... AR sound was awesome. Hacking should be an active longer process... Like GTA 5... not run up and hold your button..... Thats what everyone asked for in beta... we got a quicker run up and press your button and only in one spot! Shinny dropsuits got traded for shinny ground and wall textures... Which make picking out a dropsuit amoungst reflective dirt?!... a pain in the ass.. [*] Everyone wants proper futuristic scopes... What we have now is barely the technology the 3rd world military's have for scopes.
Kierkegaard Soren Forsaken Immortals Top Men. 252	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:44:00 - [23] - Quote Wow. That music. And the plasma bursts on impact. And that minimap! I never played any of the earlier builds, but they look so...distinctive. Very different beast to what we have now. I noticed the bit detection was a little ****** in that video though. Dedicated Commando. "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." -Paul Atreides.
ads alt 117	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:46:00 - [24] - Quote Kierkegaard Soren wrote: Wow. That music. And the plasma bursts on impact. And that minimap! I never played any of the earlier builds, but they look so...distinctive. Very different beast to what we have now. I noticed the bit detection was a little ****** in that video though. I only played ambush so I didnt see the minimap or anything 1.8 will release...
Mobius Wyvern Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 4705	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:49:00 - [25] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVZILONI45U&list=UU3GKUr_1HWTLqNnQZRhOhkw The HUD Bobbing The Minimap The Plasma Rifle Muzzle flash The Turret Installations and Null Cannon models The Hacking Animation (Look at the control panel) Small Installations 78k SP, for that one battle! Where did it all go so wrong?! Gameplay may have sucked harder than it does now, but everything about the game looked better, we also had a gamemode in which the Attacker was actually attacking, and the Defender was actually defending. Why? The SP was so high because they jacked it up for testing. In the early Beta you could haul in 240k SP in one match easily. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 817	Posted - 2014.03.08 17:57:00 - [26] - Quote Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Best PVE idea I've seen.
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 309	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:03:00 - [27] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Just Bshate honestly, look on other games like AC, Mirrors Edge, Motorstorm, GTA V, Infamous, TLoU and tell me, do you really accept their words?! NOPE they just dont know how to properly optimize engine waht they chosed, nothing else Support* - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
The Robot Devil Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1904	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:04:00 - [28] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: The hype for vita app being days away? . "You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus." Raoul Duke
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2859	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:05:00 - [29] - Quote Knight Soiaire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gameplay>Graphics Is it too much to ask for great gameplay and great graphics? Do we really have to choose between the two? Yes Frankly CCP should have told the community to **** off and CCP develop how they wanted to Vehicles have gone through about 2 full changes, infantry at least 4 i think and half the mods and weapons for both playstyles have been changed so much Intelligence is OP
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 229	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:12:00 - [30] - Quote Sam Tektzby wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Because the PS3 couldn't handle the new assets and the graphics at the same time. Just Bshate honestly, look on other games like AC, Mirrors Edge, Motorstorm, GTA V, Infamous, TLoU and tell me, do you really accept their words?! NOPE they just dont know how to properly optimize engine waht they chosed, nothing else They completely broke the graphics in Mirror's Edge. Look at the PC version for what it's supposed* to look like. All AC games have horrible PS3 ports with extreme screen tearing and freezes. InFamous is far less busy in terms of what it requires of the hardware. Especially the collision model/environmental interaction is a joke. Dunno about TLoU, but Uncharted was done by programming wizards. Those same people did Crash Bandicoot and wrote a blog about the kind of hacks they used to make 3D run on the PS1. They are geniuses in that regard. CCP does not have that kind of skilled console developers.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.