DUST Search - TankBush

All Channels

General Discussions

TankBush

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Echo 1991 WarRavens League of Infamy 59	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:18:00 - [1] - Quote So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this crap needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out.
Obodiah Garro Tech Guard RISE of LEGION 671	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:20:00 - [2] - Quote HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7495	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:20:00 - [3] - Quote All working as intended. Sounds like fun to me. But duna has been doing this for months.......why stop him now? "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Dauth Jenkins Ultramarine Corp 78	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:21:00 - [4] - Quote To be honest, I wouldn't mind a vehicle free ambush Sees prototompers... Sees blueberries start to snipe... Pulls out commando suit with laser rifle and swarm launcher...
mollerz Minja Scouts 2399	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:23:00 - [5] - Quote Just played a match.. 6-7 tanks were rolling around. The weirdest thing.. I hacked a blaster turret and started railing a blaster tank... took out it's shields.. started eating into it's armor... and the tanker got out of his tank! I was like wut. Then I shot him down and left his hobbled tank as bait.. no one took it so I just blowed it up. What the hell is the point? You gotta hustle if you wanna make a dolla
Happy Violentime OMFGZOMBIESRUN 221	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:25:00 - [6] - Quote Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies.
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 736	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:27:00 - [7] - Quote I have posted on this before, a simple solution that benefits ALL playstyles -2 HAV's in Ambush (No tanks isn't really a good option, if you want all infantry play COD) -3 HAV's in Domination -4 HAV's in Skirmish This benefits everyone, Tanks still run all modes, Infantry aren't crushed by 6/7 HAV's Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7495	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:27:00 - [8] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies. But that's like banning Infantry from skirmish...... Either way war does not work like that, you don't get to arbitrarily decide who deploys what and where, only CONCORD can do that. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Icarus DelSol BIG BAD W0LVES 25	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:28:00 - [9] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies. I think a game mode that promoted LAVS full of heavies and logis would be fun actually...
Justice Darling Themis Argonauts 37	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:28:00 - [10] - Quote Really some underground maps would be nice way to keep tanks and any other vehicles out of the match, Bust out the heavy boys Its time for an overhaul

True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7498	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:32:00 - [11] - Quote Justice Darling wrote: Really some underground maps would be nice way to keep tanks and any other vehicles out of the match, Bust out the heavy boys Its time for an overhaul Yeah but then I could call in MTAC which I would. I'm a vehicle man through and through. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Happy Violentime OMFGZOMBIESRUN 222	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:34:00 - [12] - Quote Icarus DelSol wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies. I think a game mode that promoted LAVS full of heavies and logis would be fun actually... You should have been here for the indestructible Logi LAV's then! Heavy pulls up in a LLAV, jumps out and starts mowing everyone down with his HMG then drives off like a scrub as soon as they start taking dmg
Logi Stician The Vanguardians INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 262	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:36:00 - [13] - Quote Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this crap needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. Well I was in a few Tankmination(c) battles where there were 5 or 6 tanks on the field. I believe we were good sports and tried our best to AV the tanks, but man oh man, what a whoopin' they put on us. Just seemed like dropping everything to handle the tanks left us wide open to infantry reaming. raises glass Here's to playable, fun-for-all balance in 1.8! "...and I'm the seventh out of seven sons, my pappy was a pistol, I'm a son of a gun. "
Bethhy Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 1329	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:37:00 - [14] - Quote Dauth Jenkins wrote: To be honest, I wouldn't mind a vehicle free ambush Yah you just want DUST 514 without vehicles... Tiered suits... Weapon tiers..... The maps are way to big aswell... Basically CoD but done by CCP. Right? So much of what sorry state DUST has become from 1.4 can be blamed on this kind of understanding in DUST.
Happy Violentime OMFGZOMBIESRUN 223	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:40:00 - [15] - Quote Anyway, best way not to get killed by Duna? Quit the match whenever he's on the other side. If you stay. That's your choice. I generally leave cos I'm damned if he's going to pad his stats with anymore of my deaths. What's he going to do when in every match the opposition leave?? He won't be able to pad his stats then
Rusty Shallows 1030	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:42:00 - [16] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies. But that's like banning Infantry from skirmish...... Either way war does not work like that, you don't get to arbitrarily decide who deploys what and where, only CONCORD can do that. You have to spawn in match before getting a HAV. Everyone starts as infantry. So it isn't the same at all. If you have a fix for Tankbush please share. Considering the amount of flak CCP has been getting on this topic since before Uprising 1.7 something needs to be done. Here, have some candy and a Like. :-) Forums > Game
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7498	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:46:00 - [17] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: True Adamance wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: HAV needs to be banned from Ambush, full stop. All vehicles, otherwise next it will be 6 ADS a side and LAV's full of heavies. But that's like banning Infantry from skirmish...... Either way war does not work like that, you don't get to arbitrarily decide who deploys what and where, only CONCORD can do that. You have to spawn in match before getting a HAV. Everyone starts as infantry. So it isn't the same at all. If you have a fix for Tankbush please share. Considering the amount of flak CCP has been getting on this topic since before Uprising 1.7 something needs to be done. I don't claim to have a solution but simply exiling something because you don't like it is not the way to achieve a heathy and balanced game. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Mortedeamor Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1414	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:48:00 - [18] - Quote i think duna would quit dust if he couldnt run ina 6 tank squad in tankbush A laser rifle master for life not just for when it becomes popular Long Live the Empress Burn the Heretics
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5085	Posted - 2014.02.24 23:59:00 - [19] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: I have posted on this before, a simple solution that benefits ALL playstyles -2 HAV's in Ambush (No tanks isn't really a good option, if you want all infantry play COD) -3 HAV's in Domination -4 HAV's in Skirmish This benefits everyone, Tanks still run all modes, Infantry aren't crushed by 6/7 HAV's To be honest, I'd much rather see other issues such as AV weaponry, map design, and "smart" deploy fixed as opposed to a hard cap on the amount of vehicles. I don't think it'd be fair to vehicle pilots who invested almost all of their SP into vehicles, and just want to have a fun game with there friends. How about, we fix these issues first, as opposed to covering a band-aid over the real problem. That would truly benefit everyone. HAVs run in all modes, nobody is stomped by HAVs, and HAV pilots can have fun with there friends. Atiim (Gunnlogi - 80GJ Particle Cannon) Tank Scrub I've adapted, and soon I will HTFU... ...Permanently. In a Gunnlogi
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7501	Posted - 2014.02.25 00:05:00 - [20] - Quote Atiim wrote: TheD1CK wrote: I have posted on this before, a simple solution that benefits ALL playstyles -2 HAV's in Ambush (No tanks isn't really a good option, if you want all infantry play COD) -3 HAV's in Domination -4 HAV's in Skirmish This benefits everyone, Tanks still run all modes, Infantry aren't crushed by 6/7 HAV's To be honest, I'd much rather see other issues such as AV weaponry, map design, and "smart" deploy fixed as opposed to a hard cap on the amount of vehicles. I don't think it'd be fair to vehicle pilots who invested almost all of their SP into vehicles, and just want to have a fun game with there friends. How about, we fix these issues first, as opposed to covering a band-aid over the real problem. That would truly benefit everyone. HAVs run in all modes, nobody is stomped by HAVs, and HAV pilots can have fun with there friends. That's why I am here. Not because I like shitting all over your game time but instead because I have fun doing my thing. If wanted HAV vs HAV all the time I'd be in WoT. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha

Justice Darling Themis Argonauts 38	Posted - 2014.02.25 04:52:00 - [21] - Quote Bethhy wrote: Dauth Jenkins wrote: To be honest, I wouldn't mind a vehicle free ambush Yah you just want DUST 514 without vehicles... Tiered suits... Weapon tiers..... The maps are way to big aswell... Basically CoD but done by CCP. Right? So much of what sorry state DUST has become from 1.4 can be blamed on this kind of understanding in DUST. No, really what I would like to see is when you have 10 guys with AV hitting tanks and they are perm tanked, and not dying to be NOS'ed and WEB and there over all usefulness drop to 0% without ground support, so they can't do their best impression of Monty python and the holy grail of "RUN AWAY" its a killer Dust bunny, but folks don't want a game that is from the universe of EvE Online. They want a World of Tanks version of CoD done by CCP, myself I would love to be back in the universe of EvE and call it a day.
Michael Arck Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 3287	Posted - 2014.02.25 05:09:00 - [22] - Quote Just up the swarms and AV... Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Are you OUKH?
CommanderBolt ACME SPECIAL FORCES 800	Posted - 2014.02.25 05:45:00 - [23] - Quote I hate it how everyone compares any sort of idea to 'Oh you want COD'. No we just want fun. Ambush is NOT fun when before you even get into the game 7+ tanks are rolling around and camping spawns. I regularly get a forge out but once the spawns are camped there is NOTHING you can do. Not a thing. The only way you can do a damn thing is to get a lucky fast spawn and then head for high ground. I usually start off with uplinks and try and get a good position for AV for my team. I come back in with a forge and occasionally I do smash me up a silly tanker. The problem is even if by some miracle you do kill a tank, his friends soon rush up on you at 100mph with blasters blazing. And to think, you guys have the audacity to say we want COD? What's so wrong with an infantry only ambush? It would be great fun and there is support for it. Don't give me the "It does not fit in with EVE lore". The entire mode of ambush does not fit in with EVE lore. Fk - the whole game does not fit in with eve lore if we want to be technical! Join our public channel - A great place to hang out / find squads. ACME SPECIAL FORCES PUB**
OliX PRZESMIEWCA Bezimienni... 22	Posted - 2014.02.25 06:46:00 - [24] - Quote Tankers don't wanna separate ambush mode because they will play that ambush alone without infantry (maybe except few forge/remote users). All railguns :)
Justice Darling Themis Argonauts 38	Posted - 2014.02.25 20:00:00 - [25] - Quote also why does ambush have smart deploy its anything but, it would be better if it was more random the dumb deploy into the enemy hands, If you ask me its anything but smart
Tau Lai Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 52	Posted - 2014.02.25 20:04:00 - [26] - Quote Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. Since tanks are balanced, It doesn't matter if there are 7 or 16 tanks in game. It is balanced. Ironic mode OFF.
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 769	Posted - 2014.02.25 20:08:00 - [27] - Quote I repeat..... HAV limits 2 in Ambush 3 in Domination 4 in Skirmish Until enough people agree and push CCP to do this, Enjoy the Tank spam !!!! Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2908	Posted - 2014.02.25 20:12:00 - [28] - Quote What's happening is that players are choosing the more appropriate suit for the task at hand. The task is to slay infantry and there is one suit that does so far better than all the rest. It has far more eHP, DPS, and speed than every other suit in the game. It costs about as much as an ADV suit of any other type so it's an economical choice. You my call it a tank, but I call it a suit because it is worn by a single person, has a main weapon that is built to slay infantry, and fills exactly the same role. Anyone not choosing that suit is either too late for the team cap or is being foolishly stubborn.
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2908	Posted - 2014.02.25 20:18:00 - [29] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: I repeat..... HAV limits 2 in Ambush 3 in Domination 4 in Skirmish Until enough people agree and push CCP to do this, Enjoy the Tank spam !!!! Artificial caps on otherwise OP suits is not the way. Tanks need to be given a different role than infantry so they fill a different need. It shouldn't be a race to see who gets the OP suit this match. Make them good at something infantry can't do and poor at competing with the infantry's job and you will see a natural cap on usage. People will judge that it's better to run infantry than bring out a fourth tank. Right now a tank trumps every other suit, so there's no reason not to choose it.
nakaya indigene 0uter.Heaven 126	Posted - 2014.02.25 21:10:00 - [30] - Quote they should limit veciles in separate tiers. for example. light tier having a large quota. medium limited to 3. and large limited to 2. not just for ambush. skirm and dom also The Jove espier --- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPGgRFDT9eYY1dMwb50luXw

Scheherazade VII 274	Posted - 2014.02.25 21:13:00 - [31] - Quote The problem is that a single group of people are completely destroying and ruining an entire game mode for a lot of people. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit there and farm. duna must have a pretty sad life if this is all he does all day every day.
Alternate Insano SUICIDE SPITE SQUAD 180	Posted - 2014.02.25 21:37:00 - [32] - Quote It's a crappy game. I'm sure the devs are too busy looking for new jobs to care if its players are killing it. DUST 514 Super Scrub Level 262 Forum Troll Play, or play not. There is no balance.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7540	Posted - 2014.02.25 21:41:00 - [33] - Quote Alternate Insano wrote: It's a crappy game. I'm sure the devs are too busy looking for new jobs to care if its players are killing it. Prospective CPM candidate right ^ folks..... "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 773	Posted - 2014.02.25 23:43:00 - [34] - Quote Scheherazade VII wrote: The problem is that a single group of people are completely destroying and ruining an entire game mode for a lot of people. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit there and farm. duna must have a pretty sad life if this is all he does all day every day. Single group of people??? seriously??? I may have referenced Duna2002 but he is not alone in this A majority of the playerbase are taking advantage of this, or using Alts to do so If Dust players were not so quick to abuse the game at the first chance We would all see that CCP have done a good job with vehicles ... - Cost Effective - Near invulnerable during hardeners Which they need to be to give new tankers a chance to train, there are 3 issues with HAV - Stacked hardeners fixes - Less effectiveness when stacked, reduced from 40% to 25% each - Remove ability to stack (as with speed mods) - Increase fitting cost, make it so fitting 2 would take majority of your fitting cost - Vehicle limits (estimate of no.) - 2 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Ambush - 3 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Domination - 4 HAV 3 DS (2max ADS) 3 LAV in Skirmish This would go a long way towards balancing battles in Dust And make the Vehicles more important to your team ... Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7562	Posted - 2014.02.25 23:49:00 - [35] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: Scheherazade VII wrote: The problem is that a single group of people are completely destroying and ruining an entire game mode for a lot of people. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit there and farm. duna must have a pretty sad life if this is all he does all day every day. Single group of people??? seriously??? I may have referenced Duna2002 but he is not alone in this A majority of the playerbase are taking advantage of this, or using Alts to do so If Dust players were not so quick to abuse the game at the first chance We would all see that CCP have done a good job with vehicles ... - Cost Effective - Near invulnerable during hardeners Which they need to be to give new tankers a chance to train, there are 3 issues with HAV - Stacked hardeners fixes - Less effectiveness when stacked, reduced from 40% to 25% each - Remove ability to stack (as with speed mods) - Increase fitting cost, make it so fitting 2 would take majority of your fitting cost - Vehicle limits (estimate of no.) - 2 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Ambush - 3 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Domination - 4 HAV 3 DS (2max ADS) 3 LAV in Skirmish This would go a long way towards balancing battles in Dust And make the Vehicles more important to your team ... You are also forgetting that if you ban me from game modes you are ruining my enjoyment of a section so the game. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Alternate Insano SUICIDE SPITE SQUAD 183	Posted - 2014.02.26 02:03:00 - [36] - Quote I seem to always come back to one thing. The biggest problem DUST has is a skill system that allows one player to get vastly ahead of another such that fps skills don't matter. There is no changing this, the game is built around it. Why then, with such a fatal flaw looming over everything, don't the devs attempt to fix the little things, when the players generally would enjoy the small tweaks and improvements such that they continued playing, or even recommended it to friends? Their inaction does not make sense. DUST 514 Super Scrub Level 262 Forum Troll Play, or play not. There is no balance.
MRBH1997 Knights Of Ender Galactic Skyfleet Empire 69	Posted - 2014.02.26 02:14:00 - [37] - Quote Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. Rarely can you not contract this, a simple sica or forge fun can usually solve the problem. What would be smart is to get your squad away from the tanks and get a bunch of 2x damage modes sicas. Until 1.8 this should easily own the average tank spammer because rarely are they actually good at tanking. Just wait till 1.8 and militia spammers will be nonexistent which will reduce tank spammers significantly. All you will have left are PC ringers with wallets for it. CEO of Knights of Ender Corporation Website: http://koe.shivtr.com Public Channel: Knights of Ender Public
Scout Registry Nos Nothi 1336	Posted - 2014.02.26 03:38:00 - [38] - Quote Would be nice if they kept CCP Logic Loop in the loop. Our maps were likely not planned to support 6+ tanks per side.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7593	Posted - 2014.02.26 03:39:00 - [39] - Quote Scout Registry wrote: Would be nice if they kept CCP Logic Loop in the loop. Our maps were likely not planned to support 6+ tanks per side. You didn't hear? Shhhhhh..... "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Echo 1991 WarRavens League of Infamy 62	Posted - 2014.02.26 10:13:00 - [40] - Quote MRBH1997 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. Rarely can you not contract this, a simple sica or forge fun can usually solve the problem. What would be smart is to get your squad away from the tanks and get a bunch of 2x damage modes sicas. Until 1.8 this should easily own the average tank spammer because rarely are they actually good at tanking. Just wait till 1.8 and militia spammers will be nonexistent which will reduce tank spammers significantly. All you will have left are PC ringers with wallets for it. Hard to do when you spawn and insta-die.

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1881	Posted - 2014.02.26 10:20:00 - [41] - Quote Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. You're complaining about ambush. You go into ambush with it in the back of your mind, that you might face up to 7 tanks, yet you still go in. You complain about it. You want tanks balanced around ambush, and you don't care about FW and PC. Why should CCP continue to listen to people like you, when it's literally the same story all the time? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Rasatsu Much Crying Old Experts 1097	Posted - 2014.02.26 11:20:00 - [42] - Quote Your team should have had plenty of time to get out some JLAV's before they hit 7.
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 777	Posted - 2014.02.26 11:32:00 - [43] - Quote True Adamance wrote: TheD1CK wrote: Scheherazade VII wrote: The problem is that a single group of people are completely destroying and ruining an entire game mode for a lot of people. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit there and farm. duna must have a pretty sad life if this is all he does all day every day. Single group of people??? seriously??? I may have referenced Duna2002 but he is not alone in this A majority of the playerbase are taking advantage of this, or using Alts to do so If Dust players were not so quick to abuse the game at the first chance We would all see that CCP have done a good job with vehicles ... - Cost Effective - Near invulnerable during hardeners Which they need to be to give new tankers a chance to train, there are 3 issues with HAV - Stacked hardeners fixes - Less effectiveness when stacked, reduced from 40% to 25% each - Remove ability to stack (as with speed mods) - Increase fitting cost, make it so fitting 2 would take majority of your fitting cost - Vehicle limits (estimate of no.) - 2 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Ambush - 3 HAV 1 ADS 1 DS 3 LAV in Domination - 4 HAV 3 DS (2max ADS) 3 LAV in Skirmish This would go a long way towards balancing battles in Dust And make the Vehicles more important to your team ... You are also forgetting that if you ban me from game modes you are ruining my enjoyment of a section so the game. Dammit, True.... No-one gets banned from any mode.... The numbers get capped so the vehicles are required to be skilled I have no issue fighting tankers, myself and revolutionkiller actively deploy In 'Duna Hunting' ambushes, the issues is 6/7 HAV's ..... HAV's are not OP it is just the amount is impossible to deal with Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
Echo 1991 WarRavens League of Infamy 62	Posted - 2014.02.26 15:29:00 - [44] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: So was just in an ambush with none other than the infamous duna. They had 7 tanks. Seriously, this needs to be sorted. There is never a need to have more than 3-4 tanks in a battle ever. It makes it completely one sided and it sucks the fun out of the game when you cant spawn at all without being shot by an ion cannon. CCP please sort this out. You're complaining about ambush. You go into ambush with it in the back of your mind, that you might face up to 7 tanks, yet you still go in. You complain about it. You want tanks balanced around ambush, and you don't care about FW and PC. Why should CCP continue to listen to people like you, when it's literally the same story all the time? Why should a team be able to call in 8 tanks in an ambush? Explain that. You just want tanks to roll over everything and not once did i mention anything about balancing tanks around ambush. It shouldnt even be balanced around PC because a small amount of people play that game mode. Tanks should not be readily available to every single person and be able to go toe to toe with actual tanks. The sheer amount of tanks us stupid and needs to be adjusted. It wont even cause many problems if the amount of tanks that can be deployed was set at 4 if militia ones were removed or the price was increased.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.