Dust: Rock(railguns), paper(missiles), scissors(blasters)

Rock beats scissors and beats paper and can only lose to other rocks. or if the rock seriously ****s up on a massive scale.

Dafuq is that CCP? Rails outdps blaster tanks(at close range no less! 136.5x7 shots per second=955.5 damage vs 1455 once per second. oh, and by the way, that's a prototype blaster vs. a standard rail), outrange missiles(with no dropoff, which missiles irrationally have to deal with)

CCP tank balance: everyone should use rails, all the other turrets are just for fluff and lore reasons, we fully intended for no one to use anything but the rail tank.

I miss when tanks were choice intensive(do I make a brawling blaster tank, a missile tank for crowd control, or a rail to take out high interest targets)

now the only choice is "how masochistic do I feel today?" when you're deciding on anything but a railtank.

Why even say this game has any kind of choice when there are clearly defined "bests" in every single category?

Best all around rifle: Rail.
Best tank turret: rail.
Best tank: gunnlogi(easier to fit massive EHP and damage at the same time)
Best logi: Gallente.
Best "literally every other situation except stealth" suit: Heavy.

Don't pretend your game has choice when you make clear winners by wide margins.

thats what i hate about dust there is variety but no diversity, people think creating a diverse fit is putting
a proto rail rifle on a heavy suit.

there's so many combinations on dust, I like to use what I find fun but I get shat on by people who don't care about fun
and only use what allows them to gain easy kills and cheap wins.

that's all it is, kids exploiting cheap playstyle, OP fittings and exploiting broken game mechanics.
it's like nobody cares how much there is to unlock and experiment with in dust, they just use
what's powerful at the moment

i wish people would stop treating this game like call of duty