|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
517
   |
Posted - 2014.02.24 03:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
This thread is still going on?
I'll help out, here's the TL;DR of this entire ****.
Godin - Jihads are OP and are far too effective for their price range. Nothing should be so unstoppable and cause me these kind of deaths!
Forumgoers - But you are driving an HAV? Wanting something nerfed against your OP vehicle is hypocritical, right?
Godin - I know I'm driving a mostly unstoppable killing machine that shrugs off AV like The Incredible Hulk, but im so mad about jihad LAV's i want them fixed NAOW!
Forumgoers - But again, thats hypocritical...what?
Godin - I'm not being a hypocrite, because I said HAV's are too OP in their current form and they need some tweaking done!
Forumgoers - But...but..You know the HAV's are currently borked and can bend the entire battlefield over for some advanced bedchamber tactics, and are still using them...just like the people using the OP borked Jihad LAV's for an easy tank kill. Can you not see the issue here?
Godin - *ignores it entirely and moves on to the next post that lets him repeat the same context of his OP, but in a new thread in hopes people will overlook his flaws*
/thread |
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 04:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:
Wrong. I said they need to be fixed all at once. I stopped using my HAV's about 3 weeks ago, and stopped playing 2 weeks ago (waiting on 1.8), so that's also wrong.
I get it.
So even though the majority agrees that the jihad LAV is a cheap tactic that was spawned by the sheer inability to kill a tank with what are supposed to be effective counters, and that its fine in its removal when, and only when, HAV's are in a much more balanced state, you decided to create a thread to beat a dead horse?
Wait, no...i don't ******* get it at all. |
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
518
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 04:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:
Wrong. I said they need to be fixed all at once. I stopped using my HAV's about 3 weeks ago, and stopped playing 2 weeks ago (waiting on 1.8), so that's also wrong.
I get it. So even though the majority agrees that the jihad LAV is a cheap tactic that was spawned by the sheer inability to kill a tank with what are supposed to be effective counters, and that its fine in its removal when, and only when, HAV's are in a much more balanced state, you decided to create a thread to beat a dead horse? Wait, no...i don't ******* get it at all. Then why are these people saying that it should stay in, even if they get balanced?
What, the few that simply told you to HTFU with their cheesey one line responses? Yea, you can't exactly twist that around to "I want Jihads to stay even when HAV's get balanced. That's you assuming what they are thinking.
The ones that actually want it to stay in even after fixes...well, why do you give a ****? When someone says the holocaust didn't exist, do you argue with them until you beat the horse's corpse into manure, or simply shrug it off as idiocy?
Man, i have this feeling that you wanted to try and farm likes and failed miserably at it. This thread is just pointless.
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
520
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 04:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:LAVALLOIS Nash wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
So even though the majority agrees that the jihad LAV is a cheap tactic that was spawned by the sheer inability to kill a tank .
Well in all fairness, the inability to kill the tank sparked the method, but now people have refined it into a opportunity tactic. You guys want to spin an image of a battered infantry on the brink, mounting one final suicide assault by sacrificing a piece of equipment. That is sometimes the case. But lately, I see people doing this in the midst of a large tank on tank engagement. Ill see 3 tanks vs 3 enemy tanks, and jeeps swerving here and there picking off the fleeing wounded tanks. Just so were clear, im not advocating the removal of such a tactic. I just want people to understand completely, that it has gone from a defensive tactic to an offensive one. See Lex? My point is sound. assuming is bad.
Your point this entire thread has been for the removal of Jihad LAV's, with no mention at all, in any way shape or form, what LAVALLOIS said.
Acting as if someone else's logically induced comment was your own, is bad. |
|
|
| |
|