DUST Search - T-minus 8 days until March...

All Channels

General Discussions

T-minus 8 days until March...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ripley Riley 610	Posted - 2014.02.20 15:59:00 - [1] - Quote And not much is known about 1.8. Threads in the feedback and ideas like this one and this one give us glimpses at possibilities for 1.8, but minimal comments from devs. We can only assume they are reading our feedback. The images in those threads haven't been updated with any new data so our ability to continue to provide feedback is hampered. The respec discussion thread that was created contains only one dev post: the initial one stating CCP LogiBro wrote: Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it. No answer, one way or another, in regards to the respec. Some players feel alienated by CCP, others feel outright hostility for refusing to comment on what is a fairly one-dimensional issue: do the changes in 1.8 warrant a respec? If no answer can be given, can players be told what is going through CCP's collective minds? Let us be a part of the dialogue. As of right now, we are simply talking to ourselves. PC locking is crippling an entire game mode at the moment. Corporations gain millions of ISK with no risk; essentially a slap in the face of the "High Reward = High Risk / Low Reward = Low Risk." model that Eve Online worked so hard to create. Little discussion of possible solutions is taking place, unless it is being done with CPM, who aren't commenting on the topic. The effects of the runaway ISK mint that is PC 1.0 will cause these elite corps to the be defacto rulers of the soon-to-be(?) eve marketplace. Perhaps CCP is counting on PC 2.0 to correct the issues, but we only know what you tell us and so far that isn't much at all. HAV's continue to steam roll. Swarm launchers feel like you may as well be firing bottle rockets at a Humvee. Scouts... well not much to be said that hasn't already been said. Perhaps 1.8 will give you folks some love. Who knows. Not me. Devblogs have been promised, but not delivered. T-minus 8 days until March... "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 934	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:04:00 - [2] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: And not much is known about 1.8. Threads in the feedback and ideas like this one and this one give us glimpses at possibilities for 1.8, but minimal comments from devs. We can only assume they are reading our feedback. The images in those threads haven't been updated with any new data so our ability to continue to provide feedback is hampered. The respec discussion thread that was created contains only one dev post: the initial one stating CCP LogiBro wrote: Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it. No answer, one way or another, in regards to the respec. Some players feel alienated by CCP, others feel outright hostility for refusing to comment on what is a fairly one-dimensional issue: do the changes in 1.8 warrant a respec? If no answer can be given, can players be told what is going through CCP's collective minds? Let us be a part of the dialogue. As of right now, we are simply talking to ourselves. PC locking is crippling an entire game mode at the moment. Corporations gain millions of ISK with no risk; essentially a slap in the face of the "High Reward = High Risk / Low Reward = Low Risk." model that Eve Online worked so hard to create. Little discussion of possible solutions is taking place, unless it is being done with CPM, who aren't commenting on the topic. The effects of the runaway ISK mint that is PC 1.0 will cause these elite corps to the be defacto rulers of the soon-to-be(?) eve marketplace. Perhaps CCP is counting on PC 2.0 to correct the issues, but we only know what you tell us and so far that isn't much at all. HAV's continue to steam roll. Swarm launchers feel like you may as well be firing bottle rockets at a Humvee. Scouts... well not much to be said that hasn't already been said. Perhaps 1.8 will give you folks some love. Who knows. Not me. Devblogs have been promised, but not delivered. T-minus 8 days until March... You don't get it. Its not going to fix anything. If you look at the problem, the real problem, you will see it is CCP. They keep us so focused on game breaking garbage that we never notice that nothing really changes. Every patch it's just shuffled about. Same garbage just reordered. Who wants some?
Boot Booter Omega Elite Mercs INC. 307	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:09:00 - [3] - Quote Good summary of most of the top issues but devs usually go dead silent around this time before updates, until patch notes are released. I assume they are reading and discussing our ideas the best they can but don't want to start a feeding frenzy on the forum this early.
Ripley Riley 612	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:12:00 - [4] - Quote Boot Booter wrote: I assume they are reading and discussing our ideas the best they can but don't want to start a feeding frenzy on the forum this early. But is that what we should expect of them? Making changes without input from the community is one of the reasons 1.7's vehicle "balancing" went so poorly. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Boot Booter Omega Elite Mercs INC. 307	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:13:00 - [5] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: You don't get it. Its not going to fix anything. If you look at the problem, the real problem, you will see it is CCP. They keep us so focused on game breaking garbage that we never notice that nothing really changes. Every patch it's just shuffled about. Same garbage just reordered. Lighten up dood. No one is forcing you to play this game. I think adding the other suits that were missing is a big step. The last couple updates have been pretty solid except with the usual balancing issues.
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 934	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:14:00 - [6] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Boot Booter wrote: I assume they are reading and discussing our ideas the best they can but don't want to start a feeding frenzy on the forum this early. But is that what we should expect of them? Making changes without input from the community is one of the reasons 1.7's vehicle "balancing" went so poorly. taking 3months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. Who wants some?
Boot Booter Omega Elite Mercs INC. 307	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:16:00 - [7] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Boot Booter wrote: I assume they are reading and discussing our ideas the best they can but don't want to start a feeding frenzy on the forum this early. But is that what we should expect of them? Making changes without input from the community is one of the reasons 1.7's vehicle "balancing" went so poorly. True enough, I'm just stating the fact that the silence isn't unusual. Certainly I'd like more feedback but they are probably busy implementing what they have now. What would you like them to change at this point about 1.8?
Ripley Riley 612	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:18:00 - [8] - Quote Boot Booter wrote: True enough, I'm just stating the fact that the silence isn't unusual. Certainly I'd like more feedback but they are probably busy implementing what they have now. What would you like them to change at this point about 1.8? If I knew what 1.8 contained I might be able to answer that question. Unfortunately, even though we have threads asking for our feedback, they don't commit to the content anytime in the near future. For all we know this stuff could be scheduled for the first expansion. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley 612	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:22:00 - [9] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes were posed to the community beforehand. I'm sure the AV crowd would have had a great deal to say about the nerfs in 1.7. As a SL user I know I would have... "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
TheDarthMa94 The New Age Outlaws WINMATAR. 112	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:23:00 - [10] - Quote I can't wait for the next update! New suits, new maps and stuff that i don't know! Just thinking about it will give me a boner..... Sith Apprentice and Director of NAO "What skills? Its the connection bro!"

Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 936	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:30:00 - [11] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes were posed to the community beforehand. I'm sure the AV crowd would have had a great deal to say about the nerfs in 1.7. As a SL user I know I would have... go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. Who wants some?
Boot Booter Omega Elite Mercs INC. 308	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:37:00 - [12] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes were posed to the community beforehand. I'm sure the AV crowd would have had a great deal to say about the nerfs in 1.7. As a SL user I know I would have... go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. That happens with every game. There are always tryhards that will do anything to make themselves feel better by using the best gear. Are you suggesting that CCP does it on purpose to make money?
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI 9449	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:46:00 - [13] - Quote "And not much is known about 1.8", nope, much is known. 3 new sidearm weapons, 2 new racial light suits (Caldari and Aarr) and their scout specializations, 3 new heavy suits (Gallente, Minmatar, Caldari) and their commando and sentinel specializations. On the subject of scouts, they're getting cloaking equipment (to which they'll get a bonus to) and a 2nd equipment slot. I don't know how you can say "Who knows" on the subject when you just linked a big source of info on the subject. We also know there will be a mass driver damage buff, and a laser rifle buff. Also a rail rifle and combat rifle nerf (and maybe other weapons) to increase the time-to-kill. We also know war points will be awarded fr damaging vehicles. There is actually a lot that we do know about 1.8. As for the respec thing, yeah, it is frustrating not to hear what they're thinking of on the subject. I made my case as rationally and as best as I could (and I think I did a good job https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1849419#post1849419 ). The community is behind respecs, so I really don't know what the holdup is. The PC thing does suck, there is a bit of news on the subject: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1854942#post1854942 not that promising, bu its something. The AV/HAV thing is indeed a serious problem. Its not even the month of the patch yet. As much as I want devblogs, its not like their late with devblogs, so I don't see why you should be mad or concerned about it. Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 937	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:50:00 - [14] - Quote Boot Booter wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes were posed to the community beforehand. I'm sure the AV crowd would have had a great deal to say about the nerfs in 1.7. As a SL user I know I would have... go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. That happens with every game. There are always tryhards that will do anything to make themselves feel better by using the best gear. Are you suggesting that CCP does it on purpose to make money? yep, nobody or group of people is that dumb. So perhaps the are smart. Who wants some?
Ripley Riley 615	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:52:00 - [15] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: "And not much is known about 1.8", nope, much is known. 3 new sidearm weapons, 2 new racial light suits (Caldari and Aarr) and their scout specializations, 3 new heavy suits (Gallente, Minmatar, Caldari) and their commando and sentinel specializations. On the subject of scouts, they're getting cloaking equipment (to which they'll get a bonus to) and a 2nd equipment slot. I don't know how you can say "Who knows" on the subject when you just linked a big source of info on the subject. Wait, all of the above has been CONFIRMED for 1.8? Can I get a dev post that states all of the content you listed is going to make it into 1.8? Not being argumentative, actually, this would make me very happy to know. KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: We also know there will be a mass driver damage buff, and a laser rifle buff. Also a rail rifle and combat rifle nerf (and maybe other weapons) to increase the time-to-kill. I had forgotten about the TTK posts. Yes, they seem to be addressing some concerns with TTK. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Hecarim Van Hohen Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 451	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:55:00 - [16] - Quote Someone is feeling a bit impatient it seems I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 1.7 best match (HMG): 40/9/9 (K/A/D)
Ares 514 D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 525	Posted - 2014.02.20 16:57:00 - [17] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: And not much is known about 1.8. Threads in the feedback and ideas like this one and this one give us glimpses at possibilities for 1.8, but minimal comments from devs. We can only assume they are reading our feedback. The images in those threads haven't been updated with any new data so our ability to continue to provide feedback is hampered. The respec discussion thread that was created contains only one dev post: the initial one stating CCP LogiBro wrote: Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it. No answer, one way or another, in regards to the respec. Some players feel alienated by CCP, others feel outright hostility for refusing to comment on what is a fairly one-dimensional issue: do the changes in 1.8 warrant a respec? If no answer can be given, can players be told what is going through CCP's collective minds? Let us be a part of the dialogue. As of right now, we are simply talking to ourselves. PC locking is crippling an entire game mode at the moment. Corporations gain millions of ISK with no risk; essentially a slap in the face of the "High Reward = High Risk / Low Reward = Low Risk." model that Eve Online worked so hard to create. Little discussion of possible solutions is taking place, unless it is being done with CPM, who aren't commenting on the topic. The effects of the runaway ISK mint that is PC 1.0 will cause these elite corps to the be defacto rulers of the soon-to-be(?) eve marketplace. Perhaps CCP is counting on PC 2.0 to correct the issues, but we only know what you tell us and so far that isn't much at all. HAV's continue to steam roll. Swarm launchers feel like you may as well be firing bottle rockets at a Humvee. Scouts... well not much to be said that hasn't already been said. Perhaps 1.8 will give you folks some love. Who knows. Not me. Devblogs have been promised, but not delivered. T-minus 8 days until March... Well said. If this build doesn't come out early March after so long of this horrible 1.7 build I might loose it. The mic bubble bug... I yield, CCP will be fixing it SOON. Current ETA 1 year since bug
Ripley Riley 617	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:02:00 - [18] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. Having a poorly balanced game causes you to lose players. Without players no one will buy your aurum gear and boosters. This is a stupid business decision and no marketing team would try to create a steady revenue stream using the method you described. It might create a burst of revenue for a short period or time, but then it would dwindle and eventually die as the player base left. It would make CCP far more money to create a good game that lasts (see: Eve Online) than a bad game that fails. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 938	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:03:00 - [19] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. Having a poorly balanced game causes you to lose players. Without players no one will buy your aurum gear and boosters. This is a stupid business decision and no marketing team would try to create a steady revenue stream using the method you described. It might create a burst of revenue for a short period or time, but then it would dwindle and eventually die as the player base left. It would make CCP far more money to create a good game that lasts (see: Eve Online) than a bad game that fails. honestly I don't think their servers could handle this game doing well. Who wants some?
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI 9449	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:03:00 - [20] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: "And not much is known about 1.8", nope, much is known. 3 new sidearm weapons, 2 new racial light suits (Caldari and Aarr) and their scout specializations, 3 new heavy suits (Gallente, Minmatar, Caldari) and their commando and sentinel specializations. On the subject of scouts, they're getting cloaking equipment (to which they'll get a bonus to) and a 2nd equipment slot. I don't know how you can say "Who knows" on the subject when you just linked a big source of info on the subject. Wait, all of the above has been CONFIRMED for 1.8? Can I get a dev post that states all of the content you listed is going to make it into 1.8? Not being argumentative, actually, this would make me very happy to know. KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: We also know there will be a mass driver damage buff, and a laser rifle buff. Also a rail rifle and combat rifle nerf (and maybe other weapons) to increase the time-to-kill. I had forgotten about the TTK posts. Yes, they seem to be addressing some concerns with TTK. They're collectively referred to as 1.8 changes here https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1847233#post1847233 Would find other posts, but its hard enough doing this on my phone. Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+

Ripley Riley 617	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:07:00 - [21] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: They're collectively referred to as 1.8 changes here https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1847233#post1847233 Would find other posts, but its hard enough doing this on my phone. Thank you for that. While I am happy to hear that the proposed changes are coming in 1.8 I wish they would update the feedback threads with changes they are proposing. New images aren't even necessary, just make a new post, "Hey guys, we've taken the feedback and here are the news stats!" Followed by more data to mull over. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 938	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:07:00 - [22] - Quote I can forgive them being deceitful or greedy. I can not forgive incompetence. I would prefer my CCP to be douchebags rather than morons. Its all about observation because they don't actually communicate. Who wants some?
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 938	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:13:00 - [23] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: go up and read my earlier post. CCP will always have an imbalance. Its for selling boosters and aurum. If we had the gear we wanted we could just play and have fun. There will always be something for the people that chase k/d and OP gear. They are the ones that spend money. At a point that easy cheese needs to be changed because people are skilled in. New Op gear is either dusted off or introduced. People spend to get into that. Over and over. Having the merc you want and making informed decisions has very little to do with it. Having a poorly balanced game causes you to lose players. Without players no one will buy your aurum gear and boosters. This is a stupid business decision and no marketing team would try to create a steady revenue stream using the method you described. It might create a burst of revenue for a short period or time, but then it would dwindle and eventually die as the player base left. It would make CCP far more money to create a good game that lasts (see: Eve Online) than a bad game that fails. we do lose players. The monthly cycle is where FoTm came from. Letting us skill up and use the weapons we want would be bad for business. Why would we buy boosters if we matured enough to work on other aspects of the game? Did you ever notice that GET AUR is at the top of every list in the market? Who wants some?
Ripley Riley 619	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:23:00 - [24] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Why would we buy boosters if we matured enough to work on other aspects of the game? To max out more non-essential but still useful skills, skill into other dropsuit roles, become vehicle pilots, and try out other weapons. Plus grinding SP is not the future focus of Dust. The grind may be a large portion of the game now, but it won't be forever. CCP will rely on the metagame and politics inherent in the New Eden universe to keep players in the long term. Not an SP grind. Darken-Soul wrote: Did you ever notice that GET AUR is at the top of every list in the market? Yes. Companies are in business to make money. In other news, water is wet. Again, CCP will make more of the aforementioned money if they create a good game, than a bad one. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 1301	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:40:00 - [25] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes were posed to the community beforehand. I'm sure the AV crowd would have had a great deal to say about the nerfs in 1.7. As a SL user I know I would have... I posted before about super fast tanks and why nerfing the sl range was a bad idea but CCP disregarded our inputs and instead listened to TANK WHINERS...............BAH!!!!! T-minus 99 days for PS4 availability to maybe normalise and Planetside 2 so hopefully by then its Hasta la vista.....Bayby for CCP Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!! Jumps into escape pod! Selected destination Planet PS4.
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 940	Posted - 2014.02.20 17:41:00 - [26] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Why would we buy boosters if we matured enough to work on other aspects of the game? To max out more non-essential but still useful skills, skill into other dropsuit roles, become vehicle pilots, and try out other weapons. Plus grinding SP is not the future focus of Dust. The grind may be a large portion of the game now, but it won't be forever. CCP will rely on the metagame and politics inherent in the New Eden universe to keep players in the long term. Not an SP grind. Darken-Soul wrote: Did you ever notice that GET AUR is at the top of every list in the market? Yes. Companies are in business to make money. In other news, water is wet. Again, CCP will make more of the aforementioned money if they create a good game, than a bad one. Good for you if you still got hope. Who wants some?
Ripley Riley 623	Posted - 2014.02.20 18:16:00 - [27] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Good for you if you still got hope. Hope is for suckers and presidents, I've got several hundred years of business science. Good products make more money than bad products, unless of course you are making a Broadway play... "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley 646	Posted - 2014.02.26 14:05:00 - [28] - Quote T-minus three days until March and we've had one devblog featuring CCP FishWalker. While I appreciate hearing from some of the quieter team members in Shang Hai, this devblog contains precisely nothing of what we need to hear (see OP for specifics). We've been promised devblogs "in the weeks leading up to 1.8". If we assume the latest 1.8 will be rolled out is 3/31 then we will not be given any information until mid-March? CCP is aware that a dozen titles launch in March for PS3, right? Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes, Dark Souls 2, BioShock Infinite GÇÿBurial at Sea Episode 2GÇ¦ (DLC but still). Destiny is not being released in March, but if you hope to retain some of the playerbase that might leave for Destiny you are going to want to keep us engaged. Want to know a terrific way to keep us from being engaged? Tell us nothing and keep feeding us lines about repecs being discussed internally. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
ALT2 acc 120	Posted - 2014.02.26 14:08:00 - [29] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: T-minus three days until March and we've had one devblog featuring CCP FishWalker. While I appreciate hearing from some of the quieter team members in Shang Hai, this devblog contains precisely nothing of what we need to hear (see OP for specifics). We've been promised devblogs "in the weeks leading up to 1.8". If we assume the latest 1.8 will be rolled out is 3/31 then we will not be given any information until mid-March? CCP is aware that a dozen titles launch in March for PS3, right? Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes, Dark Souls 2, BioShock Infinite GÇÿBurial at Sea Episode 2GÇ¦ (DLC but still). Destiny is not being released in March, but if you hope to retain some of the playerbase that might leave for Destiny you are going to want to keep us engaged. Want to know a terrific way to keep us from being engaged? Tell us nothing and keep feeding us lines about repecs being discussed internally. Planetside 2 in april, the 2nd, ps4 Banned until the 10th Reason: I said "feg" I lol'd so dammed hard, it's not even funny, oh wait, yes it is.
Gregor stormwalker Seraphim Auxiliaries 69	Posted - 2014.02.26 14:20:00 - [30] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Good for you if you still got hope. Hope is for suckers and presidents, I've got several hundred years of business science. Good products make more money than bad products, unless of course you are making a Broadway play... thanks now i cant stop singing "it spring time for ccp and new Eden"

Ripley Riley 755	Posted - 2014.02.28 18:32:00 - [31] - Quote Tomorrow is March 1st. Still no devblog explaining 1.8 features or updates made to the feedback threads. Discussions relating to respecs have been banished to a thread in F&I to be forgotten. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 6992	Posted - 2014.02.28 19:06:00 - [32] - Quote I hereby dub that from this point and onward the third month of each year shall be now known as Amarrch. Mail me in game if interested in learning about the Amarr Empire and serving them in Faction Warfare. Amarr Victor!
Ripley Riley 759	Posted - 2014.02.28 19:46:00 - [33] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: I hereby dub that from this point and onward the third month of each year shall be now known as Amarrch. Aero has spoken. Let it be so. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Jack Kittinger Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 154	Posted - 2014.02.28 19:55:00 - [34] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: I hereby dub that from this point and onward the third month of each year shall be now known as Amarrch. Aero has spoken. Let it be so. isn't this another iteration of the rollingold thingy from a day or two ago?? Proud winner of the 'Templar BPO Raffle' by Castor Crave!! Lucky Number 29
TXSTORO Defenders of the Helghast Dream Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 17	Posted - 2014.02.28 20:08:00 - [35] - Quote Bump --Adapt or Die-- Jack of All Trades Apply to "Defenders of the Helghast Dream"
Ripley Riley 801	Posted - 2014.03.04 14:04:00 - [36] - Quote The first Tuesday of March has arrived; patchless and without devblogs. The 11th, 18th, and 25th could be patch dates, but my money is on the 25th as that would still fit the "devblogs in the weeks prior to 1.8" mantra CCP is following. A community manager let a select few players know in IRC... Quote: CCP]Saberwing We're working on some but they're not 100% ready yet :) Aero what are the topics? [CCP]Saberwing There'll be 3 for 1.8 we think [CCP]Saberwing Weapons, Dropsuits, and Equipment (Cloaking) Cat_Merc when release plz Cat_Merc Also, when will we hear from Rouge? [CCP]Saberwing This month (release) [CCP]Saberwing Rouge will be April / May I think Perhaps one of these will be released this week? ...Trying to lift my own spirits? Probably. In other news, I resubscribed to Eve after several years off. ISIS is neat. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
ResistanceGTA D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 324	Posted - 2014.03.04 14:09:00 - [37] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: The first Tuesday of March has arrived; patchless and without devblogs. The 11th, 18th, and 25th could be patch dates, but my money is on the 25th as that would still fit the "devblogs in the weeks prior to 1.8" mantra CCP is following. A community manager let a select few players know in IRC... Quote: CCP]Saberwing We're working on some but they're not 100% ready yet :) Aero what are the topics? [CCP]Saberwing There'll be 3 for 1.8 we think [CCP]Saberwing Weapons, Dropsuits, and Equipment (Cloaking) Cat_Merc when release plz Cat_Merc Also, when will we hear from Rouge? [CCP]Saberwing This month (release) [CCP]Saberwing Rouge will be April / May I think Perhaps one of these will be released this week? ...Trying to lift my own spirits? Probably. In other news, I resubscribed to Eve after several years off. ISIS is neat. I think the 25th is the only real option now. If patch notes have to be out a week before, the 11th is almost certainly done for. If Devblogs proceed the pacth notes by about a week (with all coming out the same week) then we could feasibly get 1.8 on the 18th, but, devblogs would need to start flying soon (not Gäó). xSivartx is my Heavy. There are many like him, but he is my own... So, other Logi's back off, those are my Warpoints!


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.