|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Attorney General
1957
   |
Posted - 2014.02.14 14:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
My current recommendations:
Tanks:
Nerf Blaster Range by 30%
Reduce speed 3%
Reduce Nitrous boost by 5%
Reduce Gunloggi CPU/PG, number TBD
Increase turning abilities of the Madrugar slightly, to slightly reduce the mobility disadvantage versus Gunloggis.
AV:
FG:
Reduce charge times to 1.6 levels.
Swarms:
Either a 15% damage buff, or a 20% range increase, but not both.
Increase magazine size by at least 1 round.
AV nades:
No changes
PLC:
CCP have stated that the PLC is in a place where it is difficult to balance without making it OP against infantry.
Increase projectile velocity 25%
Increase range 10%
Increase precharge 15%
Increase damage 25%
Hopefully the precharge time is what prevents people spamming them in city structures, but allows the weapon to perform a relatively high skill high damage blow to vehicles.
Proxies/RE's
Players should not need to reload to distribute proto and advanced explosives.
Proxie damage could go up, I don't know by how much.
RE's seem alright, maybe more damage, but I don't know if CCP wants RE's to one shot all heavies or not.
I think thats everything.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
The Attorney General
1957
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 14:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
voidfaction wrote:
that is the team work for the whole battle not how it takes team work to drive the tank, shoot with the tank activate the modules, etc. I want to know why your dropsuit (tank) should only require 1 person to operate but multiple working togeting to fight against. does your tank cost 3x isk what my 200k isk scout suit costs? If it should take a tank to kill a tank maybe it should take infantry to kill infantry.
One player can take out a tank. Get good, HTFU, etc.....
My tank doesn't cost quite triple of your suit, but 550k is no laughing matter. If you are unable to deal with MLT tanks, then see the above.
It doesn't take a tank to kill a tank, it is a matter of effectiveness. Infantry can do it, and in certain situations can do it better than a tank can. Knowing which is which helps.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
The Attorney General
1957
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 15:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:
Still have yet to be soloed by AV.
Would you like to be the first?
Sure
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
The Attorney General
1958
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 15:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:
How about Monday in Caldari FW?
ok.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
The Attorney General
1960
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 15:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
stlcarlos989 wrote:Tankers what it to take coordinated teamwork by AV to take them out which is fine but only if it takes coordinated teamwork to operate a tank.
What I mean is remove large blasters, make small turrets easier to fit for tanks, and a kick feature so the tanker can remove any gunners if need be to recall or get gunners in who are on mic or in their squad.
Only bad tankers are arguing for more than one AV person to take out a tank.
Anyone who is making that argument can be directed to me for correction.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
The Attorney General
1962
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 15:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
You sound like infantry.
Just a realist of what is balanced in a game.
The only question that really matters, and it gets consistently ignored is how long should it take a single AV person to destroy a tank? When people start having that discussion, then we are making progress.
Until then everyone is just bashing their heads against he wall trying to defend their interests.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
|
|
| |
|