Godin Thekiller wrote:

It's no secret that I love Gallente. I use mostly Gallente things (I use rails in EVE instead of blasters, which are technically blasters, and blasters suck for drone boats, and I use the CR over the PR. Everything else is Gallente stuff). I even use Maddy and blasters (unless I get pissed off at a redline rail and switches to a Gunnlogi rail) 60% of the time, and the rest of it is spent running around in a Gallente Scout. However, I noticed something that many others have noticed:

1: the small blasters suck against small rails or missiles on any vehicle

2: large blasters are too infantry oriented

Now, the small ones need some fixes. it needs dispersion to better hit target, as the accurateness of it does not match the sight or the speeds it's usually used at. Make it more like the HMG in that regard.

As for the large ones, they need to become a higher vehicle oriented, but less infantry oriented. The ways I've been seeing them, such as making them a giant PLC is silly, ass it more fits the way it is now than that. Blasters simply need a nerf in ROF and a slight nerf in tracking, but more damage. So although it'll be harder to aim with it, and consecutive shots are are hard to pull off, hitting large targets will still be easy, and it'll kill the larger targets easier due to higher alpha.


Peace, Godin

Veteran Pilot

"Fight on and fly on to the last drop of blood and the last drop of fuel, to the last beat of the heart."

Oxskull Duncarino wrote:

Haha, I'm not surprised by the juvenile quality of your response considering you spent the last long time posting on the forums through an imaginary friend, good auld Roger

I've taken out plenty of tanks with a forgegun, in fairly similar circumstances, yet I'm not so arrogant/stupid to presume it was due to my superb skills at strafing in my high eHP fat suit while charging a forgegun that was the clincher in the kill.

Maybe 10% of the kills would be simply due to the fact that I got an open ground ambush fully going while their hardeners were on cool down. 90% of the kills are due to idiots driving them that just forget basics when they come under fire outside their optimal. If they've a hardener all they've to do is activate it and roll forward 50m, not hard considering the HAVs are fast, and wipe me out before my fat waddling ass can get into cover or reload and get the kill shot.

I've had a blaster Maddie with a terrible pilot square off with me on open ground, sit still and demonstrate to me how bad his aim sucked as I emptied my forgegun clip from ~50m, reloaded and finished him, after which I still had half my shield left. If you want to lump yourself in with these pilots, work away I know optimum is well below 200m, but claiming a single fatsuit waddling back and forth on open ground charging a forgegun causes you issues.....lol.

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

Godin Thekiller wrote:

It's no secret that I love Gallente. I use mostly Gallente things (I use rails in EVE instead of blasters, which are technically blasters, and blasters suck for drone boats, and I use the CR over the PR. Everything else is Gallente stuff). I even use Maddy and blasters (unless I get pissed off at a redline rail and switches to a Gunnlogi rail) 60% of the time, and the rest of it is spent running around in a Gallente Scout. However, I noticed something that many others have noticed:

1: the small blasters suck against small rails or missiles on any vehicle

2: large blasters are too infantry oriented

Now, the small ones need some fixes. it needs dispersion to better hit target, as the accurateness of it does not match the sight or the speeds it's usually used at. Make it more like the HMG in that regard.

As for the large ones, they need to become a higher vehicle oriented, but less infantry oriented. The ways I've been seeing them, such as making them a giant PLC is silly, ass it more fits the way it is now than that. Blasters simply need a nerf in ROF and a slight nerf in tracking, but more damage. So although it'll be harder to aim with it, and consecutive shots are are hard to pull off, hitting large targets will still be easy, and it'll kill the larger targets easier due to higher alpha.


Peace, Godin

u can ban the troll out of the forums but u can't ban the forums out of the troll.

Zirzo Valcyn wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

It's no secret that I love Gallente. I use mostly Gallente things (I use rails in EVE instead of blasters, which are technically blasters, and blasters suck for drone boats, and I use the CR over the PR. Everything else is Gallente stuff). I even use Maddy and blasters (unless I get pissed off at a redline rail and switches to a Gunnlogi rail) 60% of the time, and the rest of it is spent running around in a Gallente Scout. However, I noticed something that many others have noticed:

1: the small blasters suck against small rails or missiles on any vehicle

2: large blasters are too infantry oriented

Now, the small ones need some fixes. it needs dispersion to better hit target, as the accurateness of it does not match the sight or the speeds it's usually used at. Make it more like the HMG in that regard.

As for the large ones, they need to become a higher vehicle oriented, but less infantry oriented. The ways I've been seeing them, such as making them a giant PLC is silly, ass it more fits the way it is now than that. Blasters simply need a nerf in ROF and a slight nerf in tracking, but more damage. So although it'll be harder to aim with it, and consecutive shots are are hard to pull off, hitting large targets will still be easy, and it'll kill the larger targets easier due to higher alpha.


Peace, Godin

yea it sux they removed the scatter blaster that had dispersion

there was hint one time of HMG turrets

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Zirzo Valcyn wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

It's no secret that I love Gallente. I use mostly Gallente things (I use rails in EVE instead of blasters, which are technically blasters, and blasters suck for drone boats, and I use the CR over the PR. Everything else is Gallente stuff). I even use Maddy and blasters (unless I get pissed off at a redline rail and switches to a Gunnlogi rail) 60% of the time, and the rest of it is spent running around in a Gallente Scout. However, I noticed something that many others have noticed:

1: the small blasters suck against small rails or missiles on any vehicle

2: large blasters are too infantry oriented

Now, the small ones need some fixes. it needs dispersion to better hit target, as the accurateness of it does not match the sight or the speeds it's usually used at. Make it more like the HMG in that regard.

As for the large ones, they need to become a higher vehicle oriented, but less infantry oriented. The ways I've been seeing them, such as making them a giant PLC is silly, ass it more fits the way it is now than that. Blasters simply need a nerf in ROF and a slight nerf in tracking, but more damage. So although it'll be harder to aim with it, and consecutive shots are are hard to pull off, hitting large targets will still be easy, and it'll kill the larger targets easier due to higher alpha.


Peace, Godin

yea it sux they removed the scatter blaster that had dispersion

there was hint one time of HMG turrets

It was the same as all the other turrets (minus the stabilized, which had the highest range, and comp. Ion Cannon with the highest damage), but better in literally every way but cost. No, it has never existed.

Veteran Pilot

"Fight on and fly on to the last drop of blood and the last drop of fuel, to the last beat of the heart."

Evolution-7 wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Zirzo Valcyn wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

It's no secret that I love Gallente. I use mostly Gallente things (I use rails in EVE instead of blasters, which are technically blasters, and blasters suck for drone boats, and I use the CR over the PR. Everything else is Gallente stuff). I even use Maddy and blasters (unless I get pissed off at a redline rail and switches to a Gunnlogi rail) 60% of the time, and the rest of it is spent running around in a Gallente Scout. However, I noticed something that many others have noticed:

1: the small blasters suck against small rails or missiles on any vehicle

2: large blasters are too infantry oriented

Now, the small ones need some fixes. it needs dispersion to better hit target, as the accurateness of it does not match the sight or the speeds it's usually used at. Make it more like the HMG in that regard.

As for the large ones, they need to become a higher vehicle oriented, but less infantry oriented. The ways I've been seeing them, such as making them a giant PLC is silly, ass it more fits the way it is now than that. Blasters simply need a nerf in ROF and a slight nerf in tracking, but more damage. So although it'll be harder to aim with it, and consecutive shots are are hard to pull off, hitting large targets will still be easy, and it'll kill the larger targets easier due to higher alpha.


Peace, Godin

yea it sux they removed the scatter blaster that had dispersion

there was hint one time of HMG turrets

It was the same as all the other turrets (minus the stabilized, which had the highest range, and comp. Ion Cannon with the highest damage), but better in literally every way but cost. No, it has never existed.

Video proof of scattered blasters in uprising: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5nlkLhYVM

Also read my previous post in this thread

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

Oxskull Duncarino wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Oxskull Duncarino wrote:

Haha, I'm not surprised by the juvenile quality of your response considering you spent the last long time posting on the forums through an imaginary friend, good auld Roger

I've taken out plenty of tanks with a forgegun, in fairly similar circumstances, yet I'm not so arrogant/stupid to presume it was due to my superb skills at strafing in my high eHP fat suit while charging a forgegun that was the clincher in the kill.

Maybe 10% of the kills would be simply due to the fact that I got an open ground ambush fully going while their hardeners were on cool down. 90% of the kills are due to idiots driving them that just forget basics when they come under fire outside their optimal. If they've a hardener all they've to do is activate it and roll forward 50m, not hard considering the HAVs are fast, and wipe me out before my fat waddling ass can get into cover or reload and get the kill shot.

I've had a blaster Maddie with a terrible pilot square off with me on open ground, sit still and demonstrate to me how bad his aim sucked as I emptied my forgegun clip from ~50m, reloaded and finished him, after which I still had half my shield left. If you want to lump yourself in with these pilots, work away I know optimum is well below 200m, but claiming a single fatsuit waddling back and forth on open ground charging a forgegun causes you issues.....lol.

Imaginary? No, he just left my house (we was chilling). Also,

1: Why are you trying to kill HAV's in the open?

2: Why are you complaining that you got killed by a HAV in the open, which is their domain?

3: I was referring to myself dodging the idiots letting themselves overheat (yes, 3 HAV's all shooting at me overheated). ou just suck if you can't dodge 1.

EDIT: Trying to call a legal adult (21, almost 22) a child is quite silly.

1: If they're viable targets why shouldn't I kill them as I'm crossing ground. Open ground refers to away from cover, and that was what abarkrishna and yourself were posting about. You even introduced at the end that the fact that if cover was used it was even worse to deal with a forgegunner.

2: You might want to read that again. It was me that did the killing and I used it as an example of how bad alot of tankers are.

3: Lol, I actually would've loved to see that. Some people shouldn't be in tanks for their own good, and those three sound like they belong to that group.

And your edit. Juvenile doesn't just refer to the physical age of something, it is also used to refer to characteristics associated with the age group.

As to the OP, props for the suggestions. I love blasters myself, but I'm actually happy with HAV present blasters. HAVs just need a reduced ability to stack hardeners, or reduced power of hardeners, and rails need reduced range. Everyone to their own though.

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!

Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-