| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xaviah Reaper
Nyain San
Renegade Alliance
252
   |
Posted - 2014.02.11 14:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Once all (more or less) suits are released, can we expect the same in terms of vehicles for 1.9? Im pretty eager to see the small and heavy airships and medium ground vehicles.
i think its pretty obvious small airships will be fighter jet / anti infantry vehicles, and that heavy airships will be for mass troop insertion and extraction. As it stands, the medium vehicle is a hybrid of the two.
Also, the medium ground vehicle should imo be infantry insertion and extraction, and the LAV should have a driver, a rear turret, and a front passenger turret to make it more combat effective. that or allow the front passenger to fire his personal firearm (small > medium weapons only ! ! ). after all, it is a light "assault" vehicle. The tanks on the other hand, well they just need a few more tweaks. slow them down a little, maybe make them require a tank fireteam to operate instead of a solo pilot? like it is irl :P
opinions?
Best game with a Python:
33kills 1 death (1.6)
24kills 1 death (1.7)
|
X7 lion
Swamp Tempo
Canis Eliminatus Operatives
110
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 14:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
yes to multi man tanks, or teir 2 tanks taking more people to operate some thing like that. also i would assume the new vehicles would require BIGGER maps, i mean the current maps are designed to be assessable to all types but has no real appeal for any, id like to see maps designed with areras that require support x to access or some thing to provide a real role for the vehicle rather then another version of murder taxi.
I am death incarnate, you will not see me or hear me.
You shall only feel the strike of my blade.
|
Komodo Jones
Chaotik Serenity
464
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 15:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rather see PVE
This is a signature.
You're now reading it.
You may now reply to my post.
|
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
420
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 16:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Racial heavy weapons
Racial knifes
Racial HAV's
Racial LAV's
Racial (A)DS'
PvE
I just want my Amarr heavy weapon
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
1.7 best match (HMG): 40/9/9 (K/A/D)
|
Nikoli Gleimer
Nex Miles Militis
5
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
What im guessing the MAV will be is basically (if you have ever played Planetside 2) a sunderer. A Sunderer is a transport vehicle that is able to fit a mobile spawn unit when deployed. It is not defenseless either, it has two top turrets that are customizable.
The MAV is supposed to be equivalent to a dropship, with a few tweaks. I think it should have more armor than a dropship (or shield depending on race) because it has to stay on the ground. What happens if a tank comes up from behind it? If it had the same armor or shield as a dropship, the MAV would be too helpless.
Now this is another thing that kinda is weird to me. Why is the LAV stand for Light assault vehicle, if the driver has no offensive capabilities? (im not talking about murder taxing) If the Light aircraft is supposed to be like a fighter jet, how is that equivalent to an lav?
LAV's are for quick extraction and the turret on the back is not good enough to make it an assault vehicle. I have a feeling that the LAV will be its own class eventually, (maybe a transport class) and when speeders come in they might have turrets on the front of them.
Just some ideas |
Texs Red
DUST University
Ivy League
195
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
There is still a lot more that needs to go into infantry to balance it first, mostly a full lineup of racial equipment.
|
Xaviah Reaper
Nyain San
Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 09:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
X7 lion wrote:yes to multi man tanks, or teir 2 tanks taking more people to operate some thing like that. also i would assume the new vehicles would require BIGGER maps, i mean the current maps are designed to be assessable to all types but has no real appeal for any, id like to see maps designed with areras that require support x to access or some thing to provide a real role for the vehicle rather then another version of murder taxi.
I agree, bigger maps was something on my mind. however, the maps as it stands are all on one big grid. maybe we will see them all linked up into one battle, and dust will take a PlanetSide2 approach (which would be incredible).
As for PvE, I think CCP need to give us an indication of whether this will ever be on their agenda. I think PvE would make dust complete, and anything after that would be a bonus.
Best game with a Python:
33kills 1 death (1.6)
24kills 1 death (1.7)
|
hgghyujh
Expert Intervention
Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 12:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
BITTER BITTER BITTER! BITTER BITTER BITTER. BITTER!
Don't expect much they've been cranking out a lot the last few builds, I expect that they either have some post fanfest magic to pull out their sleeve or it will be another fix balancing and small future addition patch. |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University
Ivy League
977
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 12:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Personally I think 1.9 is going to be nothing more than a couple of bug fixes.
By the time 1.8 hits or around that time, we'll likely know what CCP Rouge's game plan with Dust is going to be and they'll be ramping up anticipation for the next named expansion of the game being unveiled at Fanfest, which is now only 12 weeks away from tomorrow.
Any large amounts of extra content coming in the game is going to arrive then, not the point build just before it.
Mercenary Clone of Dennie Fleetfoot
CEO of DUST University
CPM1 candidate
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |