|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
   |
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:While I disagree with limiting specific vehicles per battle as a way to balance things, this is comparing apples and oranges.
Both delicious fruits of labor, ripely picked from Eden's garden. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:- Immunity to all but 3 Weapons and 2 pieces of Equpment
- 16,000 ehP
- Ability to go 30km/h
- A Hardener to grant theretical immunity to attacks
- Ability to repair through attacks
- The power of 2-3 people
- Enough ammo to last entire games without re-supplying.
- Ability to recall Dropsuit without a supply depot
- Ability to bail out of dropsuit
- Tiercided and Techicided suits/modules.
Once all of these requirements are met, then you can place a hard cap on the amount of infantry on the field. 
1) Douvoulle
2) Please theory craft a fitting for me
3) 2 AV players
4) Vehicles have always been force multipliers, agreed
5) Usually have to resupply once, when I run infantry I usually die before I run out of ammo. How is ammo a problem for either?
6) What exactly would you like to do transform? lul Please elaborate.
7) Redundant irrelevant jealousy? Transformers?
8) Currently the only way for vehicles to be viable as there arn't advanced or proto vehicles, to balance against adv/proto weapons. CCP chose two different methods or balancing vehicles and dropsuits. I agree, they should decided a path but it doesn't mean there has to be imbalance using both methods. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:What if someone has never spec'd into anything? What then? They can deploy in starter suits without harm? Lol
But anyways, an HAV has a whole boat load of health and can handle Infantry with ease. There is already a limit on vehicles. Further limiting certain types of vehicles just might be viable for a fun game without getting stomped.
So do Heavies |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Just so everyone knows, the vehicle limit is 7 per side. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:AP Grasshopper wrote:Joel II X wrote:What if someone has never spec'd into anything? What then? They can deploy in starter suits without harm? Lol
But anyways, an HAV has a whole boat load of health and can handle Infantry with ease. There is already a limit on vehicles. Further limiting certain types of vehicles just might be viable for a fun game without getting stomped. So do Heavies Bro, do you even CreoDron Shotgun? Also, a heavy needs a logi in-order to handle infantry with ease. All while HAVs need: ... Your point is now null and void.
Atiim, your butt hurt biased. I understand the system isnt perfect but your "Facts" are anything but that. that's all I have to say. See you ingame |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Atiim wrote:AP Grasshopper wrote:
1) Douvoulle
2) Please theory craft a fitting for me
3) 2 AV players
4) Vehicles have always been force multipliers, agreed
5) Usually have to resupply once, when I run infantry I usually die before I run out of ammo. How is ammo a problem for either?
6) What exactly would you like to do transform? lul Please elaborate.
7) Redundant irrelevant jealousy? Transformers?
8) Currently the only way for vehicles to be viable as there arn't advanced or proto vehicles, to balance against adv/proto weapons. CCP chose two different methods or balancing vehicles and dropsuits. I agree, they should decided a path but it doesn't mean there has to be imbalance using both methods.
I'm not saying vehicles don't need tweaking but seriously Atiim
1. Doesn't give immunity to anything 2. I'm too tired. Ask me later 3. I'd love to see an AV suit go 30km/h. 4. No comment 5. I run an ammo extension unit and I almost never have to resupply. (no this isn't comparible to nanohives, as ammo extension units are both internal and passive. 6. A good tanker requires at least 2-3 people on AV to destroy. 7. Tanks can do this. If we are putting a hard-cap on them that's similar to vehicles then we have to make them similar. Otherwise this would be pointless as it would be an apples to oranges comparison; which would give no good reason for the hard cap idea in the first place. 8. Tiericided and Techicided modules aren't necessarily bad.
Made a mistake, updated my post, please revisit. My bullets are misplaced. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
145
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lets say HAV limit was 3. I call one in and two of my buddys do. Your just putting your team a disadvantage, you'll be outgunned and now you cant even out number us. How would the newberries feel then? The 3 of us will surley be running Ion cannon and Proto rail or missiles. Go ahead, call 3 Sicas in... Its only fair your allowed to call in 4 more. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
157
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 06:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
You guys have reluctantly ignored my updated bullet post in favor of the one I made an error on because I was trying to respond to 10 bullets Atiim made in his.... jesus read the pages from front to back... left to right... |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
157
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 07:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
I guess it never actually edited my post when I re-posted it... this is almost entirely nonsense and nonconstructive anyways. |
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
157
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 07:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
I am tickled that someone thought I said I run an ammo extension on a madrugar though... Or do I??? |
|
|
AP Grasshopper
The Unit 514
157
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 07:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Atiim wrote:AP Grasshopper wrote:You guys have reluctantly ignored my updated bullet post in favor of the one I made an error on because I was trying to respond to 10 bullets Atiim made in his.... jesus read the pages from front to back... left to right... I didn't even notice that you edited the bullets. My apologizes. I'll take a second look.
Looking back at it I don't think half of what I said made sense anyways lul. Lets just all hold hands on the top of the "Ring" tower thingy and sing kumbaya. Dropship service provided to you by.... |
|
|
| |
|