DUST Search - An Evolution in Tanker Mentality

Atiim wrote:

Aizen Intiki wrote:

Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV

Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value

Considering that I always the best HAV that I could make meta wise, These 2 has always been true for me. ANd yes, if we square off, and you got a rail with a damage mod, but that pos costed you under 100k, and I got a Maddy costing 300-500k, I use all kinds of techniques, and you're able to sit there, absorb several million SP worth of training into skills and several hundred hours into HAV fighting, and still without trying, you can kill me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no. MLT HAV's are OP, and eventually, they will get nerfed, as well as their turrets and modules. I bet you they will. Don't worry your petty ass though, SOONtm (probably in about 20 years) they'll have somewhere for you to use that POS in a training area or something.

Wait, if MLT HAVs are overpowered, wouldn't vehicles with PRO modules be "God-Mode" by comparison?

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Scout Registry 585	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:37:00 - [1] - Quote * Killing my tank should require substantial SP/ISK investment in AV. * Killing my tank should require more than one AV Specialist. * Killing my tank should require Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV when I'm not running hardeners. * Killing my tank should require a Heavy Weapon. Because my tank is Heavy. * Killing my tank should require another Tank. * Killing my tank should require a Tank of equal or greater value. scouts say no to quid pro quo
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 1826	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:39:00 - [2] - Quote Someone's butthurt Closed Beta Vet Reading the forums detracts from overall enjoyment of the game
Scheneighnay McBob Learning Coalition College 3589	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:45:00 - [3] - Quote I personally think that killing my tank should take intelligence (very rare here) and reasonable SP investment. IE, someone with an advanced swarm who knows their **** (choosing the right time/angles to fire, and stuff like that) should be able to kill me. We used to have a time machine
True Adamance Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire 5819	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:46:00 - [4] - Quote Scout Registry wrote: * Killing my tank should require substantial SP/ISK investment in AV. * Killing my tank should require more than one AV Specialist. * Killing my tank should require Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV when I'm not running hardeners. * Killing my tank should require a Heavy Weapon. Because my tank is Heavy. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value. You see that's actually they exact opposite of what I think. Yeah tanks should kill other tanks, but currently tanks are far too powerful for their own good. "My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity."
Scout Registry 588	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:51:00 - [5] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Someone's butthurt Yeah, I was butthurt when my suit got nerfed about 8 months back. Guess we had it coming; Scouts were kinda OP back in Chrome. Not even close to as overpowered as Tanks are right now ... Ahhh ... nostalgia ... anywho ... Enjoy your cake while it lasts :-) scouts say no to quid pro quo
Aizen Intiki Hell's Gate Inc League of Infamy 691	Posted - 2014.01.17 02:57:00 - [6] - Quote Scout Registry wrote: * Killing my tank should require substantial SP/ISK investment in AV. * Killing my tank should require more than one AV Specialist. * Killing my tank should require Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV when I'm not running hardeners. * Killing my tank should require a Heavy Weapon. Because my tank is Heavy. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value. Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value Considering that I always the best HAV that I could make meta wise, These 2 has always been true for me. ANd yes, if we square off, and you got a rail with a damage mod, but that pos costed you under 100k, and I got a Maddy costing 300-500k, I use all kinds of techniques, and you're able to sit there, absorb several million SP worth of training into skills and several hundred hours into HAV fighting, and still without trying, you can kill me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no. MLT HAV's are OP, and eventually, they will get nerfed, as well as their turrets and modules. I bet you they will. Don't worry your petty ass though, SOONtm (probably in about 20 years) they'll have somewhere for you to use that POS in a training area or something. "Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say Alt of the great Godin I like chocolate ^___^
Billi Gene 443	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:18:00 - [7] - Quote tanks are harder to kill which is as it should be. but AV did take various nerfs with this last patch..... so I'm just waiting for the return swing of the Pendulum. Cheap tanks, that is the problem atm.... i can fit a MLT for less than a proto suit, and i can only guess that it is so, because CCP want data. My ADS costs more than my Maddy!!! Tanks are not invincible, i'd say they are working as intended. The RES mods create extremely tough vehicles for a limited amount of time. Choosing when to attack, and trying to create situations where the tank pilot overextends are currently integral to the process of taking out the tank. The rebalance is in all probability on its way, but hopefully its not gonna be a big swing. incidently: my metric for OP is the general arrogance of the player base in question.... getting tanks to overextend is sometimes too easy. Pedant, Ape, Troll. My Beard makes Alpha's sook :P
KING CHECKMATE Ametat Security Amarr Empire 3665	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:23:00 - [8] - Quote Scout Registry wrote: * Killing my tank should require substantial SP/ISK investment in AV. * Killing my tank should require more than one AV Specialist. * Killing my tank should require Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV when I'm not running hardeners. * Killing my tank should require a Heavy Weapon. Because my tank is Heavy. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value. Yup. Pretty Much. Soon it will be: Killing my tank should require at least an enemy tank of equal or greater value , plus AV support , plus an OB.... XD GIVE ME A RESPEC CCP.*
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3555	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:27:00 - [9] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Someone's butthurt I wouldn't call being truthful butthurt. But then again, I guess the OP must have made you butthurt if your replying to it in such a matter. I've got some baby lotion for your little bum bum if you need it. I'll go grab the bib. Creator of The AV Registry The Pilot's Whipin' Boy // DJINN Lukeoplast's alleged sock *FORGE MASTER RACE*
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3555	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:30:00 - [10] - Quote Aizen Intiki wrote: Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value Considering that I always the best HAV that I could make meta wise, These 2 has always been true for me. ANd yes, if we square off, and you got a rail with a damage mod, but that pos costed you under 100k, and I got a Maddy costing 300-500k, I use all kinds of techniques, and you're able to sit there, absorb several million SP worth of training into skills and several hundred hours into HAV fighting, and still without trying, you can kill me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no. MLT HAV's are OP, and eventually, they will get nerfed, as well as their turrets and modules. I bet you they will. Don't worry your petty ass though, SOONtm (probably in about 20 years) they'll have somewhere for you to use that POS in a training area or something. Wait, if MLT HAVs are overpowered, wouldn't vehicles with PRO modules be "God-Mode" by comparison? Creator of The AV Registry The Pilot's Whipin' Boy // DJINN Lukeoplast's alleged sock *FORGE MASTER RACE*

Lorhak Gannarsein 1218	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:33:00 - [11] - Quote Atiim wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value Considering that I always the best HAV that I could make meta wise, These 2 has always been true for me. ANd yes, if we square off, and you got a rail with a damage mod, but that pos costed you under 100k, and I got a Maddy costing 300-500k, I use all kinds of techniques, and you're able to sit there, absorb several million SP worth of training into skills and several hundred hours into HAV fighting, and still without trying, you can kill me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no. MLT HAV's are OP, and eventually, they will get nerfed, as well as their turrets and modules. I bet you they will. Don't worry your petty ass though, SOONtm (probably in about 20 years) they'll have somewhere for you to use that POS in a training area or something. Wait, if MLT HAVs are overpowered, wouldn't vehicles with PRO modules be "God-Mode" by comparison? You would think so, but considering that MLT gives near identical performance, you'd be wrong. I inadvertently switched the proto rail on a fitting of mine to an MLT one; I only realised when it dealt an unusual amount of damage to a turret. Not when I was AVing. PRO tanker and proud.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3555	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:34:00 - [12] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Scout Registry wrote: * Killing my tank should require substantial SP/ISK investment in AV. * Killing my tank should require more than one AV Specialist. * Killing my tank should require Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV. * Killing my tank should require focused fire from Proto AV when I'm not running hardeners. * Killing my tank should require a Heavy Weapon. Because my tank is Heavy. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank. * Killing my tank should require an enemy Tank of equal or greater value. Yup. Pretty Much. Soon it will be: Killing my tank should require at least an enemy tank of equal or greater value , plus AV support , plus an OB.... XD Then it will be Killing my tank should require somebody to skill into a Heavy suit with a Forge Gun, or an entire squad of Swarmers Creator of The AV Registry The Pilot's Whipin' Boy // DJINN Lukeoplast's alleged sock *FORGE MASTER RACE*
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3555	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:36:00 - [13] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: You would think so, but considering that MLT gives near identical performance, you'd be wrong. I inadvertently switched the proto rail on a fitting of mine to an MLT one; I only realized when it dealt an unusual amount of damage to a turret. Not when I was AVing. Lolno. If something has "near identical performance" as something else, then that makes them both overpowered by extension simply because they practically perform the exact same way. I know what your trying to do here, and it's not going to work. Creator of The AV Registry The Pilot's Whipin' Boy // DJINN Lukeoplast's alleged sock *FORGE MASTER RACE*
knight of 6 SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1136	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:41:00 - [14] - Quote I forgot to evolve... "God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon Ko6, scout. CLOSED BETA VET
Kal Kronos L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 163	Posted - 2014.01.17 03:56:00 - [15] - Quote I tank, cap tanks at 3 per team. Keep everything else the same other than more cpu for large rail guns. What's not to love about the scrambler rifle, the thing is a precision weapon and at the same time a shotgun.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page