|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 16:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:well, an 80k isk sica should be soloed, yes, but my half million isk tank should be right about where it is bc i invested half my Sp in it.
So, to answer your question, a very expensive, very well planned tank piloted by a high SP and highly skilled and seasoned pilot should be nigh invincible.
A mlt tank piloted by a noob should get soloed every single time someone tries.
The quickest fix would be to nerf mlt tank fitting power AND buff AV so that AV can actually punch through tanks when their hardeners are off. It usually takes 3 shots from a swarm or forge, but a bad tanker is gone by the time the second shot lands, and a good tanker will only let one hit.
Translation:
"I should be nigh invincible."
Your words, not mine. Also sums up your opinion on the matter, and your idea of "balance" as well.
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:well, an 80k isk sica should be soloed, yes, but my half million isk tank should be right about where it is bc i invested half my Sp in it.
So, to answer your question, a very expensive, very well planned tank piloted by a high SP and highly skilled and seasoned pilot should be nigh invincible.
A mlt tank piloted by a noob should get soloed every single time someone tries.
The quickest fix would be to nerf mlt tank fitting power AND buff AV so that AV can actually punch through tanks when their hardeners are off. It usually takes 3 shots from a swarm or forge, but a bad tanker is gone by the time the second shot lands, and a good tanker will only let one hit. See, that's the issue. Militia tanks can give a good fight to someone who actually invested time and skill into their asset and worked to get to where they are now. THAT is the problem with 1.7. Make Militia tanks inferior to STD ones like they used to be. The cost is fine, but they shouldn't be able to **** up someone who actually worked for their asset and put a lot of ISK into it.
No, standard tanks are just as far above militia tanks as standard suits/gear is above militia suits/gear. This is balanced.
DUST Fiend wrote:You have to be careful with AV buffs or dropships will go right back to where they were. We're actually really close to a state of balance right now, of course there are issues left that need to be addressed, but overall, it's coming along nicely for a change.
The QQ is about tanks. I don't think anyone thinks that dropships are OP right now. Of course swarms should do a bit more, but I think everyone agrees. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 16:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dauth Jenkins wrote:Atiim wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:Reported for being a douche trying to troll people. I'm not even trolling. It's been over 6 months and I have yet to actually see a decent answer to the question at hand. Tanks should be able to be solo by AV that is above their lvl. MLT tanks should be solved by proto A/V, it should take 2 AV to destroy it, or 1 very persistent AV. That way, MLT tanks get a nerf, but the others don't.
Your just another "I should be invincible" guy.
Militia AV should counter militia tanks. AV > Vehicles > infantry > AV. Why is that so hard for tankers to understand?
Also, militia tanks aren't the problem, TANKS are the problem.
Standard tanks are still much better than militia (25% more slots, high fittings). No one argues that militia suits are OP compared to standard suits, but there is just about the same difference there.
OH, and one lvl higher than militia is standard, not proto. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 16:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
CRYPT3C W0LF wrote:If you're smart with AV, you can Solo Tankers (RE, Flux, Swarm) And for the love of god, all the people bring up the argument "An 80k soma killed my Proto Suit thats costs 240k" well, before 1.7, It was the opposite. 1 Proto Swarm could SOLO a 3 Million Isk tank quite easily, how fair is that?
Now the deal with double hardeners, redline railing, and speed of each tanks needs to be looked at or fixed. Honestly I believe tanks are in a solid place if those above issues are fixed, I think It would create a balanced playing field if used/countered wisely.
Should AV be able to Solo tanks? If you're smart and play tactically, then of course. Its not that the AV itself is to blame, its how people utilize it
Are you really complaining that your dedicated counter, AV, killed tanks before?
You of all people, infantry-camping-tanker, should understand that AV should kill you just as easily as you can kill infantry. Full stop.
The only legitimate complain is that vehicles were too expensive before. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 16:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote:
Are you really complaining that your dedicated counter, AV, killed tanks before?
You of all people, infantry-camping-tanker, should understand that AV should kill you just as easily as you can kill infantry. Full stop.
The only legitimate complain is that vehicles were too expensive before.
The only legitimate complaint? Not seeing the AV troops beyond 75m was not a legitimate complaint? 3 AV nades erasing 90% of the health of a tank in 2 seconds was not a legitimate complaint? Swarms that could dispose of a tank from far outside of its optimal with a single magazine was not a legitimate complaint? You ever wonder why some tankers are so adamant with defending their vehicles? It is because there are people like this guy and Atiim and others who refuse to admit that there were things that needed balancing.
AV was invulnerable *beyond 75m* to Tanks like tanks are invulnerable *at any distance* from infantry. You have a problem with one but not the other. That is called hypocrisy
Granted, AV grenades probably did too much damage before, but now with the new hardners they do nearly no damage. The pendulum swung too far.
Swarms killing tanks from outside a tanks optimal? How about blaster tanks killing infantry, while totally invulnerable to infantry, and faster, and stronger, from 150+ meters? Or 600meters for railgns?
Things were *slightly* imbalanced before. Tanks were too expensive, rendering for vehicles sucked, swarms had too much range, and gunnlogis should have repaired as fast as the glitched armor reppers on the madrugers did.
Now? Yeah it is completely the opposite. Tanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all.
Every single tanker who complained about balance before, but are quiet now, are complete hypocrites. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 17:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote:
AV was invulnerable *beyond 75m* to Tanks like tanks are invulnerable *at any distance* from infantry. You have a problem with one but not the other. That is called hypocrisy
Granted, AV grenades probably did too much damage before, but now with the new hardners they do nearly no damage. The pendulum swung too far.
You can't fight what you can't see. If you can't see how that was unbalanced, than no amount of logic will persuade you. If you want to delude yourself, go right ahead. As for AV nades, I use them to great effect on my heavy alt. Sorry that you can no longer solo vehicles with them, but to claim they are ineffective is BS.
I guess we just pick our own arguements now? The argument above was that AV was INVULNERABLE TO TANKS. now TANKS ARE INVULNERABLE TO INFANTRY. yet one is fine and the other is not. Learn 2 read.
ALSO proof or STFU on the grenades liar.
The Attorney General wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote: Swarms killing tanks from outside a tanks optimal? How about blaster tanks killing infantry, while totally invulnerable to infantry, and faster, and stronger, from 150+ meters? Or 600meters for railgns?
Things were *slightly* imbalanced before. Tanks were too expensive, rendering for vehicles sucked, swarms had too much range, and gunnlogis should have repaired as fast as the glitched armor reppers on the madrugers did.
Now? Yeah it is completely the opposite. Tanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all.
Every single tanker who complained about balance before, but are quiet now, are complete hypocrites.
*slightly* imbalanced means you are only *slightly* ********. Yet another infantry scrub who needs to have his posts hidden. Also, please pretend like there are not tankers out making threads or posts suggesting nerfs to tanks and buffs to AV, because they do exist. You just choose to not notice them because they fly in the face of your view.
Ok so we got two things out of this arguement.
#1 you agree that tanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else atm. Good, glad to see another person admit that tanks are ridiculously op right now.
#2 You are not one of the tankers making post about nerfing tanks or boosting AV.
|
|
|
|