|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ephraim Ghanlai
BATTLE TAXI INC.
4
   |
Posted - 2014.01.10 04:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
For a vehicle of war, these things might as well be shooting spitballs at eachother. If i were developed a vehicle such as this, it would be loaded with guns and turrets that can be manned as needed. My ideal mcc would be a combination of b-52 and 18th century mon-o-war. |
Ephraim Ghanlai
BATTLE TAXI INC.
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.10 06:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Skihids wrote:Because nobody would need grunts then, would they?
We would still have to capture objectives in order to win. I just want a more entertaining battle between the mcc's. Just think how handy they would be when you've been redlined by a bunch of tanks. |
Ephraim Ghanlai
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 14:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:1. The weapons on the MCC are not weak. If they were aimed at us you would change your mind quickly.
2. The Mobile Command Center is not a gunboat. It's more a mix between transport and carrier.
The mcc's shoot at eachother throughout the entire match. When a need arises, do we not seek to fill that need? How hard would it be to mount a few guns on the side. And add a console to operate it from? It seems that the factions that go against eachother are not very aggressive about ensuring their side wins the confrontation preferring to leave everything up to a bunch of mercs that may not have their interests at heart or may be ill equipt to deal with the challenges presented to them on the battlefield. Also, manable turrets on your mcc would be very handy at helping your team regain a foothold if they have been redlined. |
Ephraim Ghanlai
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 14:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jacques Cayton II wrote:It's actually like a super carrier it has our clones, equipment, vehicles, and a command center for logistic purposes. So basically a master at defense and logistic support. The type of vehicle you speak of would be a destroyer.
It can not defend troops stuck under it and it doesn't really defend it's self. It trades blow for blow with the other mcc. The null cannons do the bulk of the work. For a ship that is probably worth billions of isk, everyone seems to have supreme confidence in the mercs fighting for them. I would think that they would want to give their mercs every opportunity to try and ensure success. |
Ephraim Ghanlai
cobra connection
Public Disorder.
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 09:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Skihids wrote:Because nobody would need grunts then, would they?
We will always need grunts for the dirty work.
They way i picture this working would be if the external turrets could be destroyed once the shields are down. Players manning them could be killed just like when they man the ground turrets. Even if you had every turret manned and blasting the enemy mcc, you couldn't win without holding half of the control points. It would give everyone a way to protect their red line too. Maybe if that turret on the underside of the mcc did more to protect it's resources, i.e. us, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
President of the, Save-a-Heavy, movement.
Leader of the, Anti-Vehicle Forces.
Keeper of the, Forge Gun of Destiny.
|
|
|
| |
|