In terms of gameplay I have helped numerous players understand the SP system,
and the different roles in Dust514, along with their counters
and I have consistently squaded with new players to give them support,
at a major sacrifice to my own ISK and KDR but I have enjoyed doing so

I wish I could make videos and it is something I will consider soonTM

How many guys involved in the CPM can say they actively deployed in Caldari FW
not for materialistic gain but simply because that section of the players needed support

I want to be sure that whatever group is providing feedback to CCP
is an unbiased team of players in different roles, combining their opinions

I don't post very much on here, but I do keep an eye on the forums
and some players know me for my contributions to Matari FW, and Caldari for the 1st 2 weeks of 1.7

What I am afraid of is that the CPM will become what I see on the forums,
which is a group of players who gang up on decisions they don't like ....
This game's playerbase is getting smaller and if decisions are ran by the 'community'
then it will continue to dwindle until the only guys left are the ones who joined the gang

I would like to see a player like myself who has had little connection to past events
but a strong interest in the game, be considered for CPM
surely this is better then having a pack make choices for all of the playerbase

And what if I don't endorse you? Why does your endorsement mean so much? And why are you acting like you are completely safe and will be a shoe-in for CPM1?

As I have said, I am only trying to learn more about the role....
Maybe given a chance I could prove more suitable for consideration, but for now I am here to learn

The main thing I want is to be able to trust that these decisions are made wisely

ToooooGa.....TooooooooGa... o I mean.. SooooooTa.....SooooooTa






don't forget what wins any election...

money


and p0rn

join irc and have a chat with me. If you can survive me then you an do well on cpm

I definitely think we need the CPM election to take into consideration that the forums are a specific subcommunity and not the be all and end all of DUST, however it's difficult to find methods of engaging en masse with the players who aren't on the forum. It's something more thought needs to be put into.

Honestly, I think we need social spaces that our mercs can interact with one another in, in game, but that's a dream for a much later date.

Keep providing input into the process, though. You're not alone in being concerned that the CPM will become a reflection of an echo-chamber which isn't in the game's best interests.

You sir are a dishonest person. I clearly lay out my views in that link and you just ignore it. If you wish to ignore a clear and concise layout of my views then I am at a dead end. I cannot in anyway reach you. Why will you not read what I wrote there? How can "lolno" be a reasoned response. If you wish to lie to yourself then that freedom is yours. do not try to lie to others about what my views are.

I absolutely want rail tanks to be a serious threat to dropships. To be a threat they need to hit hard as the window to hit us is small and they need range to keep us at bay. But doing that from the complete safety of the redline is not fair.

I would at this point make one single change to rail tanks. That they cannot engage the operational area of the map from the redline or close proximity to it. This means the objectives and their zones. let them hit the area near their redline to help a team push out if pushed back, but stop them killing people out in the burn zone trying to have a fair and fun fight by using the redline to run unrealistic builds and hide from retaliation.

How do you conduct a proper election with the ruling party still in a position to influence decision?! Don't call it an election then

LOL @ "Ruling party"

The idea that we have some "power" to "rule" or "govern" is so ridiculous there's not even any point in addressing it again, too many in this thread and elsewhere have already pointed out that we're an advisory/advocacy group and nothing more.

Also, we will absolutely be trying to influence the outcome of the election - but we'll be doing it through all the same means that every other player here has a right to wield. That is, endorsements of qualified candidates and open criticism against candidates that we don't believe are fit to serve. We've all worked waaaaaaaaayyyy too hard to get this far only to have a weak council replace us and not be able to pick up where we left off.

If we do our jobs right during the upcoming campaign season, we'll not only be replaced by individuals capable of continuing our work, we'll be replaced by individuals that will do an even better job at this than we have ourselves. I'll be the first to admit that we're not perfect and that there's many talented individuals throughout the community that deserve a chance to outshine our performance. They'll need to be equally fearless, prepared to work like dogs, and prepared for disappointment from CCP that will come in every flavor imaginable. Even during the best of times working with CCP can be stressful and none of us want anyone on the council that isn't capable of sticking out a term to the very end and handing it off to the next group that will do an even better job than CPM1.

The CSM has a long tradition of subsequent councils outshining those that come before them, building upon and iterating on the previous year's work and finding ways to improve communications with the community and to deepen their influence on CCP. I certainly hope that this tradition starts this spring with the CPM as well. I won't be running myself, but I'll be around as a resource to those that take our place, and make sure they have what they need to do a killer job.

All that to say, don't kid yourself, the CPM is not going to sit on the sideline with tape on our mouths and let a bunch of fools get elected and ruin what we've worked to build. In fact, there's many that have rightfully argued that the CPM-CCP relationship is still in its infancy, which makes electing a strong CPM1 all the more critical. It's not going to take any backroom handshakes or messing with electoral systems to do it though, the election will be more than fair. We simply have an obligation to speak our minds about who is and isn't fit to serve by the very fact that we take the future success of this institution seriously.

Oh god another postnaught.
Can't you make a post shorter than 10 lines?

Also, we will absolutely be trying to influence the outcome of the election - but we'll be doing it through all the same means that every other player here has a right to wield.