|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shruikan Iceeye
0uter.Heaven
142
   |
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
It kills faster than any other rifle execpt the cr at 5m
Scrambler excluded because its easy to overheat if you want to kill super quick
That Pretty Motherfucker
|
Shruikan Iceeye
0uter.Heaven
142
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:The scrambler rifle is by far, a faster killer, so you really can't exclude it. The rail kinda competes with it, you know.
Note that the big weakness of the rail rifle is that it's near useless in close quarters. That and the firing delay, I feel, balance it out for mid-long range combat.
Absolutely not by far, Also the firing delay and its hipfire spread do nearly nothing to gimp it in cqc
I doubt youve ever used anything above the std variant
That Pretty Motherfucker
|
Shruikan Iceeye
0uter.Heaven
142
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Shruikan Iceeye wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:The scrambler rifle is by far, a faster killer, so you really can't exclude it. The rail kinda competes with it, you know.
Note that the big weakness of the rail rifle is that it's near useless in close quarters. That and the firing delay, I feel, balance it out for mid-long range combat. Absolutely not by far, Also the firing delay and its hipfire spread do nearly nothing to gimp it in cqc I doubt youve ever used anything above the std variant the RR seems op because everybody armor tanks
I would agree with that if i hadn't experienced S.T.D RRs absolutely EAT through shields like they weren't even there
That Pretty Motherfucker
|
Shruikan Iceeye
0uter.Heaven
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 03:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Asha Starwind wrote:Shruikan Iceeye wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Shruikan Iceeye wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:The scrambler rifle is by far, a faster killer, so you really can't exclude it. The rail kinda competes with it, you know.
Note that the big weakness of the rail rifle is that it's near useless in close quarters. That and the firing delay, I feel, balance it out for mid-long range combat. Absolutely not by far, Also the firing delay and its hipfire spread do nearly nothing to gimp it in cqc I doubt youve ever used anything above the std variant the RR seems op because everybody armor tanks I would agree with that if i hadn't experienced S.T.D RRs absolutely EAT through shields like they weren't even there That's because it has high bullet damage, bias isn't going to matter to it against any suit below the overkill threshold, if it takes barely 5.2 shots to clear your shields unbiased and 5.72 shots biased it's still 6 shots.
Thank you thats all im tryna say
That Pretty Motherfucker
|
Shruikan Iceeye
0uter.Heaven
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 03:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jacques Cayton II wrote:Shruikan Iceeye wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Shruikan Iceeye wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:The scrambler rifle is by far, a faster killer, so you really can't exclude it. The rail kinda competes with it, you know.
Note that the big weakness of the rail rifle is that it's near useless in close quarters. That and the firing delay, I feel, balance it out for mid-long range combat. Absolutely not by far, Also the firing delay and its hipfire spread do nearly nothing to gimp it in cqc I doubt youve ever used anything above the std variant the RR seems op because everybody armor tanks I would agree with that if i hadn't experienced S.T.D RRs absolutely EAT through shields like they weren't even there I'm a heavy and I can out strafe a rail rifle. It's garbage compared to other rifles under 20m. If you believe otherwise then believe what you want but when a heavy doesn't complain about a weapon in cqc then it's fine. Personally I'd love more rr's on the field because of dat charge up time kills it in cqc
1. Aiming the weapon is entirely up to the user.
2. The charge up time is Nothing. Only at high levels of competition does each weapon have to be used in it's niche
That Pretty Motherfucker
|
|
|
| |
|