It seems to me that the majority of the things you mention in your post are things more readily worked on by the CSM rather than the CPM? 5 of your top 6 are solely for the benefit of EVE players. I understand that you are looking for a much greater integration between the two platforms but this is something that will take quite some time in my opinion. The next CPM would be better served concentrating on issues that directly benefit Dust players primarily.
Where do you stand on improving gameplay? How about the fact that we are still waiting on full racial parity with regards to dropsuits and weapons? I would much rather have this before the Jet from the old trailer or the planetary cannon!

If you watched the PC 2.0 presentation from EVE Vegas, you can see that CCP intends to take CCP into a more hardcore direction, a direction that doesn't directly benefit the people who would be risking hundred million or billion isk ships to drop off clones, this could essentially kill Planetary Conquest as we know it if something isn't done.

Actually, I think you're wrong. I can summon a fleet to Molden Heath, but nobody wants to go to MH, because there's no chance of combat. Many EVE players want good fights, and the current PC 1.0 system doesn't create those. The more people have in space to defend, the more people will come to attack, and the more the defenders will have to do. It turns what is otherwise and currently a "here, come take a potshot" mechanic into a full-fledged engagement with the enemy.

Top Men. is not capable of summoning a fleet in MH with their 18 somewhat inactive members. The CFC is capable of such things, but they are not and never will be interested in Molden Heath, I know because I come from the CFC (Fatal Ascension)

We have, in fact, brought a fleet down. (And yes, I'm referring to the EVE alliance, not our DUST alliance.) They were bored, so they went home. Under the pre-1.7 mechanics, orbital support was pretty few and far between for any corp we engaged in PC, because the fun just wasn't there. The new mechanics show more promise, but with no meaningful benefit to EVE for PC, nobody wants to muster any sort of orbital forces still.

(On the flip side, the LP rewards for the new FacWar orbitals have people really freaking excited.)

PC 2.0 stands to put juicy targets in space, meaning both people wanting to gank them, and people willing to step up and defend them. It's a huge opportunity for more integration, further interest for EVE players, and finally, with any luck, a system that is close to prepared to leave Molden Heath.

Yes my primary focus is linking the two games together.

You may have your work cut out for you if you get elected.
Quote from Pg72 of the CSM Summer Summit minutes.
Admittedly these are some 4 to 5 months out of date now! Things may have changed but..

Ali Aras asked: can we see more emphasis put on the EVE-DUST link? In particular, a
lot of both the CSM and CPM would really love CCP to "go bold" on the link. Ripard
added that there are upcoming competitors for both EVE Online the space game and
DUST 514 the shooter. "We're concerned that other companies are going to infringe
upon this fantastic combination that you are creating even before you can get it going,"
he said. Trebor added that when CCP starts marketing DUST 514 strongly (as
announced at Fanfest), the link is a potential differentiator from DUST's competition and
if it isn't a strong differentiator, it will be harder to sell DUST.
Hilmar was very understanding of the question and in particular held up Nova Knife's
posts about DUST as really hitting the nail on the head about the need to make DUST
514 a really kick-ass shooter. Over a period of a few minutes, he made it very clear that
CCP's primary focus for the time being will be to improve the DUST 514 gameplay
outside of the EVE-DUST link and build up DUST's reputation and audience in the
challenging F2P market.
Instead, the focus will be on improving the DUST experience; in particular, the focus will
be on grabbing shooter fans right from the get-go. As a result, while Team True Grit will
continue to build on the EVE-DUST link, Hilmar feels very strongly that they should
focus on the DUST experience and build a shooter that CCP can be proud of.

Weapon Customization = EG OPTICS Players are more use to red-dots and other optics, taking that away from them was a stupid idea.

It seems to me that the majority of the things you mention in your post are things more readily worked on by the CSM rather than the CPM? 5 of your top 6 are solely for the benefit of EVE players. I understand that you are looking for a much greater integration between the two platforms but this is something that will take quite some time in my opinion. The next CPM would be better served concentrating on issues that directly benefit Dust players primarily.
Where do you stand on improving gameplay? How about the fact that we are still waiting on full racial parity with regards to dropsuits and weapons? I would much rather have this before the Jet from the old trailer or the planetary cannon!

I agree with Bear here in that you look like a CSM candidate over CPM. The EVE/Dust Link is important and I do like to see it worked on. I'm glad you followed EVE Vegas (I was there) and you have the info on warbarges being worked on by the EVE team and not the DUST team and such. This is great, but this topic will not win you enough votes to gain a seat. If Im just looking at OPs and not digging, you would fail to grab my vote.

What about the benefits of me being on the ground and having EVE Pilots? Where's my bonuses? I want to know how you plan to rep DUST... Not just EVE

With all this said I encourage you to join us on Podside sometime and chat about the EVE/DUST link. Please let me know if intrested

With all this said I encourage you to join us on Podside sometime and chat about the EVE/DUST link. Please let me know if intrested