Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2643
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 15:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
If elected, I will push for vehicle free game modes and vehicle centric game modes as well.
As an infantryman, I'm getting pretty sick of being s*** on by constant tank spam in any game mode I try and play, and I'm sure some of you are too. Be it ambush or domination, it never fails to see 4 to 6 enemy tanks crawling around the map leading to just downright infuriating matches.
I propose something where we could go into battle finder and customize our game preferences akin to battlefield's battle finder. One would go into battle finder, hit triangle to pull up options, and then would be able to select infantry only if they'd like. Badda bing badda boom, no more tanks if you don't want them!
Now for you heavy machinery lovers out there, I'd propose a new game mode similar to battlefield's tank superiority game mode. Basically you go in, try and capture an objective, but can call in a ton of tanks. There would still be a hard limit, say ten tanks per team with the remaining 6 members on each team being infantry. It would be the infantry's job to either run AV (think of all the forge guns and swarms) or logis to keep their team's tanks alive as they try and cap the objective. Basically think domination with a ton of tanks (or dropships). In the future, MTACS and jets could also be incorporated.
Not everyone wants to deal with tanks all the time, but also I know tankers won't like the idea of being restricted from matches. These were my ideas to try and appease both sides.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Knight Soiaire
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
4277
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 15:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Payout for a vehicle only gamemode would have to be huge.
You're definitely going to end up losing a HAV by the end of the match.
DUST is so broken, even my PS3 refuses to let me play it.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
7490
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Why not put this in your main thread?
Level 7 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Gallente FW - 'Turalyon'
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2644
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Why not put this in your main thread?
I will later, I feel guilty when I bump it though.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
jenza aranda
BetaMax.
2630
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
eeh, we have spoken about this at length and sorry, i just dont think what you are proposing will neither work or fit into the new eden mentality.
Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
|
Patrick57
3620
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Personally, I wouldn't vote for you (flashback to that thread you made saying you would triple damage mod your Scrambler), but you're putting forth a lot of effort for this. Good work and keep it up
Logi ak.0 Best Logi :D
|
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
5351
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
I would vote for whoever feeds me tuna.
And rubs my belly.
And lets me catch the laser for once.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Tuna > Tacos
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:eeh, we have spoken about this at length and sorry, i just dont think what you are proposing will neither work or fit into the new eden mentality.
Damn, well thanks for the input and not letting me go on getting my hopes up.
@Patrick57
My Viziam Scrambler Rifle is all triple complex damage modded up on my a.k0, gotta turn the lost to God ya know? That's why I'm the Shepherd.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Paran Tadec
The Hetairoi
1834
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
no.
Bittervet Proficiency V
thanks logibro!
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
5270
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
I don't think you understand the role of CPM...
Never forget
How to fix the Logi
|
|
The Furtive Pygmy
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
223
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
I support OP for CPM1, guy seems like he actually cares and won't disappear for months at a time. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
11572
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up.
Lmao, yeah Jenza's post made me feel like I'm a tad late on the uptake.
I'm committed though, still taking notes and thinking of ideas despite how intimidating Jenza's thread on those running for CPM1 was.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
11575
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up. Lmao, yeah Jenza's post made me feel like I'm a tad late on the uptake. I'm committed though, still taking notes and thinking of ideas despite how intimidating Jenza's thread on those running for CPM1 was.
Well you need to not think of the current problems most of them had been brought up before the patch landed. So that's a start, I am not asking you to have congnitive abilities though but there are plenty of things you can see ahead.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aisha Ctarl wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up. Lmao, yeah Jenza's post made me feel like I'm a tad late on the uptake. I'm committed though, still taking notes and thinking of ideas despite how intimidating Jenza's thread on those running for CPM1 was. Well you need to not think of the current problems most of them had been brought up before the patch landed. So that's a start, I am not asking you to have congnitive abilities though but there are plenty of things you can see ahead.
Thanks for the advice!
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
MoonEagle A
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
89
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
The Furtive Pygmy wrote:I support OP for CPM1, guy seems like he actually cares and won't disappear for months at a time.
This guy is such a beating!!!
Did he ask you out only to be rejected? He sure has a thing for you. |
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
993
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
I'd vote for that. Where do we vote?
Do your part. Join the revolution. Sabotage FW. Help this game burn!
BURN DUST 2014
|
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2558
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:16:00 -
[18] - Quote
You lost my vote And the votes of my cult
Do Not Feed The Imperfects. Feeding them may disrupt the natural setting.
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
993
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:eeh, we have spoken about this at length and sorry, i just dont think what you are proposing will neither work or fit into the new eden mentality.
And this is exactly why the CPM needs new blood or get scrapped altogether. Either you don't push for stuff or you get outright rejected by CCP brass.
This idea actually does fit with the game and the game world. CCP can keep shooting itself in the foot. Everybody wants to go right, they go left (and not in the good way).
Every right move CCP ever made was when they had to give in and not try to be so different.
The one thing. THE ONE THING that was supposed to make DUST different is not implemented in the game when that should have been the first, basic thing that was done GÇö tight integration with EVE for important planetary resources.
Do your part. Join the revolution. Sabotage FW. Help this game burn!
BURN DUST 2014
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:eeh, we have spoken about this at length and sorry, i just dont think what you are proposing will neither work or fit into the new eden mentality.
At least from the direction and "Noobification" the un-elected CPM's have pushed for since Uprising launch. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink.
Down with the establishment! In with the NEW |
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
5272
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise.
Never forget
How to fix the Logi
|
Aeon Amadi
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4353
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise.
Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas.
A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for.
forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=
(Frames)1544109 (Advertisement)1556863 (Packs)1570030
(Lag Hunt) 1570201
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc.
1941
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:If elected, I will push for vehicle free game modes and vehicle centric game modes as well.
As an infantryman, I'm getting pretty sick of being s*** on by constant tank spam in any game mode I try and play, and I'm sure some of you are too. Be it ambush or domination, it never fails to see 4 to 6 enemy tanks crawling around the map leading to just downright infuriating matches.
I propose something where we could go into battle finder and customize our game preferences akin to battlefield's battle finder. One would go into battle finder, hit triangle to pull up options, and then would be able to select infantry only if they'd like. Badda bing badda boom, no more tanks if you don't want them!
Now for you heavy machinery lovers out there, I'd propose a new game mode similar to battlefield's tank superiority game mode. Basically you go in, try and capture an objective, but can call in a ton of tanks. There would still be a hard limit, say ten tanks per team with the remaining 6 members on each team being infantry. It would be the infantry's job to either run AV (think of all the forge guns and swarms) or logis to keep their team's tanks alive as they try and cap the objective. Basically think domination with a ton of tanks (or dropships). In the future, MTACS and jets could also be incorporated.
Not everyone wants to deal with tanks all the time, but also I know tankers won't like the idea of being restricted from matches. These were my ideas to try and appease both sides.
Sounds good mate.
Please try to add lore ish type stuff with the battle finder for giving us a reason why we can actually pick those options. That would be extremely fking difficult though I think lol.
Also may I suggest you try to push some lore for an fw territory reset so we can start again, no reason needed for why other than its just sht and I'm not even amarr or caldari.
Ideas are like a day ceasefire for whatever reason or something then oh no a matari fanatic bombs an amarrian outpost or something.
Good luck anyway
Level 1 forum warrior.
Minmatar and Gallente fw.
I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
5272
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise. Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas. A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for. The elections are going to be a joke, turning into a popularity contest to see who can farm more likes. Honestly, I'd rather CCP picks the CPM again. At least that way, we might not get so many "advocates" and more "average players".
I already tied myself to the flogging pole before posting this btw. Whips are located to your left. Feel free to beat me for my opinion everyone.
Never forget
How to fix the Logi
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2648
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise. Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas. A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for. The elections are going to be a joke, turning into a popularity contest to see who can farm more likes. Honestly, I'd rather CCP picks the CPM again. At least that way, we might not get so many "advocates" and more "average players". I already tied myself to the flogging pole before posting this btw. Whips are located to your left. Feel free to beat me for my opinion everyone.
It's a sound opinion actually and also something I thought of as well. This election is going to turn into a popularity contest.
Think if General John, Cat Merc, DUST Fiend, and Pyrex were running....
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aeon Amadi
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4353
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 20:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise. Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas. A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for. The elections are going to be a joke, turning into a popularity contest to see who can farm more likes. Honestly, I'd rather CCP picks the CPM again. At least that way, we might not get so many "advocates" and more "average players". I already tied myself to the flogging pole before posting this btw. Whips are located to your left. Feel free to beat me for my opinion everyone. It's a sound opinion actually and also something I thought of as well. This election is going to turn into a popularity contest. Think if General John, Cat Merc, DUST Fiend, and Pyrex were running....
Concerning Pyrex, he has a pretty stark view of the CPM. Just as well he habitually manipulates emotional responses in place of valid or compelling arguments, which is a shame considering how successful he is at it. However, that's something that won't fly with CCP and they'd be quick to dismiss any of his arguments due to hyperbole and general lack of professional behavior. That's something that a lot of the early candidates lack though.
forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=
(Frames)1544109 (Advertisement)1556863 (Packs)1570030
(Lag Hunt) 1570201
|
ladwar
Death by Disassociation Legacy Rising
1966
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 20:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:If elected, I will push for vehicle free game modes and vehicle centric game modes as well.
As an infantryman, I'm getting pretty sick of being s*** on by constant tank spam in any game mode I try and play, and I'm sure some of you are too. Be it ambush or domination, it never fails to see 4 to 6 enemy tanks crawling around the map leading to just downright infuriating matches.
I propose something where we could go into battle finder and customize our game preferences akin to battlefield's battle finder. One would go into battle finder, hit triangle to pull up options, and then would be able to select infantry only if they'd like. Badda bing badda boom, no more tanks if you don't want them!
Now for you heavy machinery lovers out there, I'd propose a new game mode similar to battlefield's tank superiority game mode. Basically you go in, try and capture an objective, but can call in a ton of tanks. There would still be a hard limit, say ten tanks per team with the remaining 6 members on each team being infantry. It would be the infantry's job to either run AV (think of all the forge guns and swarms) or logis to keep their team's tanks alive as they try and cap the objective. Basically think domination with a ton of tanks (or dropships). In the future, MTACS and jets could also be incorporated.
Not everyone wants to deal with tanks all the time, but also I know tankers won't like the idea of being restricted from matches. These were my ideas to try and appease both sides. so two games... CoD mode and WoT modes.... yea no thanks
Level 2 Forum Warrior, bitter vet.
I shall smite Thy Trolls with numbers and truth
not looking for a corp, don't ask.
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
3685
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 21:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Nothing for scouts?
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Mithridates VI
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2536
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 21:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
I feel like you're trying to buy votes with presents that your position actually won't empower you to deliver on.
Can you describe your understanding of the CPM position and how your availability fits into that?
Please refrain from utilizing such inflammatory sarcasm in the future. GÇö CCP Eterne
|
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
5359
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 21:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise. Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas. A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for. The elections are going to be a joke, turning into a popularity contest to see who can farm more likes. Honestly, I'd rather CCP picks the CPM again. At least that way, we might not get so many "advocates" and more "average players". I already tied myself to the flogging pole before posting this btw. Whips are located to your left. Feel free to beat me for my opinion everyone. It's a sound opinion actually and also something I thought of as well. This election is going to turn into a popularity contest. Think if General John, Cat Merc, DUST Fiend, and Pyrex were running.... I already told ya, I ain't running. I'm just making jokes.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Tuna > Tacos
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |