|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2643
   |
Posted - 2014.01.05 15:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
If elected, I will push for vehicle free game modes and vehicle centric game modes as well.
As an infantryman, I'm getting pretty sick of being s*** on by constant tank spam in any game mode I try and play, and I'm sure some of you are too. Be it ambush or domination, it never fails to see 4 to 6 enemy tanks crawling around the map leading to just downright infuriating matches.
I propose something where we could go into battle finder and customize our game preferences akin to battlefield's battle finder. One would go into battle finder, hit triangle to pull up options, and then would be able to select infantry only if they'd like. Badda bing badda boom, no more tanks if you don't want them!
Now for you heavy machinery lovers out there, I'd propose a new game mode similar to battlefield's tank superiority game mode. Basically you go in, try and capture an objective, but can call in a ton of tanks. There would still be a hard limit, say ten tanks per team with the remaining 6 members on each team being infantry. It would be the infantry's job to either run AV (think of all the forge guns and swarms) or logis to keep their team's tanks alive as they try and cap the objective. Basically think domination with a ton of tanks (or dropships). In the future, MTACS and jets could also be incorporated.
Not everyone wants to deal with tanks all the time, but also I know tankers won't like the idea of being restricted from matches. These were my ideas to try and appease both sides.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2644
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Why not put this in your main thread?
I will later, I feel guilty when I bump it though.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 16:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:eeh, we have spoken about this at length and sorry, i just dont think what you are proposing will neither work or fit into the new eden mentality.
Damn, well thanks for the input and not letting me go on getting my hopes up.
@Patrick57
My Viziam Scrambler Rifle is all triple complex damage modded up on my a.k0, gotta turn the lost to God ya know? That's why I'm the Shepherd.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up. 
Lmao, yeah Jenza's post made me feel like I'm a tad late on the uptake.
I'm committed though, still taking notes and thinking of ideas despite how intimidating Jenza's thread on those running for CPM1 was.
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2645
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 17:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aisha Ctarl wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Welcome to a few months ago, try to keep up. Lmao, yeah Jenza's post made me feel like I'm a tad late on the uptake. I'm committed though, still taking notes and thinking of ideas despite how intimidating Jenza's thread on those running for CPM1 was. Well you need to not think of the current problems most of them had been brought up before the patch landed. So that's a start, I am not asking you to have congnitive abilities though but there are plenty of things you can see ahead.
Thanks for the advice!
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
Aisha Ctarl
0uter.Heaven
2648
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 19:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Honestly, advocating for specific portions of the game isn't what I want on the CPM. Your first three words in the second paragraph align you to one mode of thinking, and that's what's wrong with the game - nobody wants to ******* compromise. Big problem is that everyone in the game gets down to specifics, trying to be a developer and proposing solutions when all that was necessary was stating the problem. You generally get more backing when you simply state what the problem is than when you try and forward some solution that only a handful will agree with. It's okay to have an opinion but the farther you get into specific outliers, the less likely the community will support your claims and ideas. A lot of CPM candidates are going to fail this way and have already begun to. Considering the plethora of players recently expressing their interest in it, I have yet to find one that I would vote for. The elections are going to be a joke, turning into a popularity contest to see who can farm more likes. Honestly, I'd rather CCP picks the CPM again. At least that way, we might not get so many "advocates" and more "average players". I already tied myself to the flogging pole before posting this btw. Whips are located to your left. Feel free to beat me for my opinion everyone.
It's a sound opinion actually and also something I thought of as well. This election is going to turn into a popularity contest.
Think if General John, Cat Merc, DUST Fiend, and Pyrex were running....
Aisha Ctarl for CPM1
|
|
|
| |
|