DUST Search - District Locking

All Channels

The War Room

District Locking

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Bloodthirsty Heathen Talledos Inc 20	Posted - 2014.01.03 10:34:00 - [31] - Quote TheWee BabySeamus wrote: dwater wrote: TheWee BabySeamus wrote: [quote=dwater]Didnt DDB start lockig all there districts when skarkon was attacked you mean during the war? yea, we did. Why are you guys doing it, oh you're cowards...........Move on Dwater.[/ I like that you knew you were gonna lose those districts Where di I say that Dwater. Like I said move on you're a non factor. And Zatara chill out bud, how else are we supposed to view you when you keep locking your districts with full clones. You and your guys, AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE, can hold your own against most of MH. I like you guys, except when you rang against us with OH . Stop playing like cowards and you get respect again, like a big boy should My eyes hurt, so I will try to fix it. Quote: "When did I say Dwater, please move on, you are a non factor. Mister Zatara, please take things slowly, I miss you, so how else can I get attention from you, if not posting this ramble? You and your subordinates, I have the gays for all of you. I've said this before, you can beat us, so why do you ignore us and lock your districts? Guys, look at me, and why did you have to ring in behalf of OH? I can't go another week without you"
GET ATMESON Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 201	Posted - 2014.01.03 11:04:00 - [32] - Quote dwater wrote: TheWee BabySeamus wrote: [quote=dwater]Didnt DDB start lockig all there districts when skarkon was attacked you mean during the war? yea, we did. Why are you guys doing it, oh you're cowards...........Move on Dwater.[/ I like that you knew you were gonna lose those districts dwater your a nice guy. Some people dont like you but I say your an alright person. You and Seamus can trash talk all you want to each other but DDB only locked them for 1 day for an assault on O.H. What a great day that was. Flip flip flip flip. PC for me from 2pm to 8pm. Gave them the butt kicking they gave me along time ago. After that are districts were online waiting to get attacked. Locking districts during a war is way different from locking them when your not in a war. That doesnt mean in a war you lock up more then 65% of your districts everyday. Outside of a war locking districts everyday. Day after day after day. These Corps shouldnt have districts. With respect ATM 1.7 HMG hotfix works great. Now for more Heavy suits or guns soonGäó
Skittles McDuckett Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 202	Posted - 2014.01.03 12:01:00 - [33] - Quote To clarify things: When the war started, ALL of our districts were attacked with large amounts of clones. We won some battles and lost some. When we got a win in, we locked districts we won on to cover clone regeneration. Once we had 300 or more clones on a district, we stopped locking the district. The districts went back online again during the war and they were attacked again. We went through several of these cycles during the war. This was a valid tactic. We were not abusing the system by locking with a friendly attack and no-showing it, guaranteeing that we got the money (36 mil, we capped the points and we lost the 36 mil) from clones packs back. The issue with locking districts arises when it is utilized as a tactic to prevent ANY attacks for prolonged periods of time. Locking districts to cover things like a holiday or a short period of time that you will not have the number to field a team is acceptable as long as you are not abusing the mechanic to get all your isk back. Taking a district out of circulation should have monetary consequences(just like a standard lock takes away a clone regen). I have the utmost respect for FA. They are a good group of clones and are great opponents. I pointed this out in the OP, this is not meant to turn into a flame war. I am attempting to point out abusers of a game mechanic and gain support from the community for our movement. Skittles McDuckett, DDB director - TASTE THE RAINBOW!!!
The Black Art Fatal Absolution 289	Posted - 2014.01.03 12:16:00 - [34] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: I pointed this out in the OP, this is not meant to turn into a flame war. I see, we're just supposed to give in to your threats.
Skittles McDuckett Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 202	Posted - 2014.01.03 12:39:00 - [35] - Quote I would like to thank the third day for complying with the wishes of the community. The OP has been edited to reflect this. Skittles McDuckett, DDB director - TASTE THE RAINBOW!!!
Mikey The Bandaid D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 83	Posted - 2014.01.03 12:51:00 - [36] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: Everyone knows this is a problem. CCP has yet to come up with a fix. Bottom line is that the community has carebeared the issue for too long. Here is my stance, it is below a cheap tactic. It allows you to hold land without fear of losing it. This destroys the ideas behind PC. It will no longer be tolerated. Locking more than 50% of your districts with friendly attacks or habitually locking your districts with friendly attacks will not be tolerated. If you are locking more than 50% of your districts, you can consider any blue status NULL AND VOID. Failure to stop locking districts within 72 hours of OP will earn you red status and your districts will be attacked when/if they come online. I DO NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE FRIENDS WITH OR IF YOUR ALLIANCE HAS BLUE STATUS WITH GOD HIMSELF. This is the cheapest of tactics and should not be tolerated by the community. After the 72 hour grace period expires, anyone that participates in attacks can do so without the fear of it affecting alliance standings. I would appreciate the community supporting this movement. We need take action ourselves if CCP is slow to act. If you manage to snipe a district and get an attack on it, please let us know and we will provide as much support as we possibly can. If anyone can give us assistance with getting districts sniped after the 72 grace period, it would be appreciated. Please give the named corporations 72 hours to comply before you launch any attacks. Current known offenders(if you are mentioned and your districts are under hostile attack, please advise): Pradox One (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Valor Coalition (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Fatal Absolution (All districts locked with friendly attacks, I honestly am surprised, you guys are good enough to hold your own against anyone, why lock your districts) KEQ (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Titans of Pheonix (All districts locked with friendly attacks) War Ravens (88% of districts under friendly attack) Corporations that have complied since OP: The Third Day Hey, look at that. Something we actually agree on! District locking is almost as dumb as PFC. Down with the district lockers!
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 347	Posted - 2014.01.03 12:56:00 - [37] - Quote Working as intended. Locking districts is NO FUN and is even more like a job than the rest of the game. It only makes sense that you get paid for it
ragewardog SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 101	Posted - 2014.01.03 13:21:00 - [38] - Quote Mikey The Bandaid wrote: Skittles McDuckett wrote: Everyone knows this is a problem. CCP has yet to come up with a fix. Bottom line is that the community has carebeared the issue for too long. Here is my stance, it is below a cheap tactic. It allows you to hold land without fear of losing it. This destroys the ideas behind PC. It will no longer be tolerated. Locking more than 50% of your districts with friendly attacks or habitually locking your districts with friendly attacks will not be tolerated. If you are locking more than 50% of your districts, you can consider any blue status NULL AND VOID. Failure to stop locking districts within 72 hours of OP will earn you red status and your districts will be attacked when/if they come online. I DO NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE FRIENDS WITH OR IF YOUR ALLIANCE HAS BLUE STATUS WITH GOD HIMSELF. This is the cheapest of tactics and should not be tolerated by the community. After the 72 hour grace period expires, anyone that participates in attacks can do so without the fear of it affecting alliance standings. I would appreciate the community supporting this movement. We need take action ourselves if CCP is slow to act. If you manage to snipe a district and get an attack on it, please let us know and we will provide as much support as we possibly can. If anyone can give us assistance with getting districts sniped after the 72 grace period, it would be appreciated. Please give the named corporations 72 hours to comply before you launch any attacks. Current known offenders(if you are mentioned and your districts are under hostile attack, please advise): Pradox One (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Valor Coalition (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Fatal Absolution (All districts locked with friendly attacks, I honestly am surprised, you guys are good enough to hold your own against anyone, why lock your districts) KEQ (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Titans of Pheonix (All districts locked with friendly attacks) War Ravens (88% of districts under friendly attack) Corporations that have complied since OP: The Third Day Hey, look at that. Something we actually agree on! District locking is almost as dumb as PFC. Down with the district lockers! what I agree with dark legion wow this most be a bad thing DOWN WITH DISTRICT LOCKING SCUM!!!!!
Skittles McDuckett Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 206	Posted - 2014.01.03 13:22:00 - [39] - Quote Mikey The Bandaid wrote: Skittles McDuckett wrote: Everyone knows this is a problem. CCP has yet to come up with a fix. Bottom line is that the community has carebeared the issue for too long. Here is my stance, it is below a cheap tactic. It allows you to hold land without fear of losing it. This destroys the ideas behind PC. It will no longer be tolerated. Locking more than 50% of your districts with friendly attacks or habitually locking your districts with friendly attacks will not be tolerated. If you are locking more than 50% of your districts, you can consider any blue status NULL AND VOID. Failure to stop locking districts within 72 hours of OP will earn you red status and your districts will be attacked when/if they come online. I DO NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE FRIENDS WITH OR IF YOUR ALLIANCE HAS BLUE STATUS WITH GOD HIMSELF. This is the cheapest of tactics and should not be tolerated by the community. After the 72 hour grace period expires, anyone that participates in attacks can do so without the fear of it affecting alliance standings. I would appreciate the community supporting this movement. We need take action ourselves if CCP is slow to act. If you manage to snipe a district and get an attack on it, please let us know and we will provide as much support as we possibly can. If anyone can give us assistance with getting districts sniped after the 72 grace period, it would be appreciated. Please give the named corporations 72 hours to comply before you launch any attacks. Current known offenders(if you are mentioned and your districts are under hostile attack, please advise): Pradox One (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Valor Coalition (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Fatal Absolution (All districts locked with friendly attacks, I honestly am surprised, you guys are good enough to hold your own against anyone, why lock your districts) KEQ (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Titans of Pheonix (All districts locked with friendly attacks) War Ravens (88% of districts under friendly attack) Corporations that have complied since OP: The Third Day Hey, look at that. Something we actually agree on! District locking is almost as dumb as PFC. Down with the district lockers! There are some interesting changes that will be coming to PFC. These changes should make PFC more interesting and it will cycle more corps through. I will make a post soon, after discussing this with a few community leaders. Skittles McDuckett, DDB director - TASTE THE RAINBOW!!!
ragewardog SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 101	Posted - 2014.01.03 13:32:00 - [40] - Quote ITs sad really you have corps like STB who fight and never lock anything.. then you have trash like pradox one who dont even show if you do attack there districts because the timers they set are so dumb they cant even put a team together... then you have rofl an alliance that has locked there districts for a very long time just making isk off them districts never needing to fight for them.. VC is a good pc team but yet they still lock there districts which is sad... I just dont get it my guys want pc every day so we try to give them that pc but corps that lock there districts do so to what make isk for what your not going to use it in pc lol damn scum

Mikey The Bandaid D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 86	Posted - 2014.01.03 13:53:00 - [41] - Quote ragewardog wrote: ITs sad really you have corps like STB who fight and never lock anything.. then you have trash like pradox one who dont even show if you do attack there districts because the timers they set are so dumb they cant even put a team together... then you have rofl an alliance that has locked there districts for a very long time just making isk off them districts never needing to fight for them.. VC is a good pc team but yet they still lock there districts which is sad... I just dont get it my guys want pc every day so we try to give them that pc but corps that lock there districts do so to what make isk for what your not going to use it in pc lol damn scum I agree. I know that our corps don't exactly have the best relations, also with DDB. One thing I hope you guys know about us at DL is we don't participate in this nonsense, and we greatly discourage this kind of act. One thing we do is fight, you guys know that. Didn't matter the opponent, we show up and fight out hardest with the guys we have available. Of course we lose some, can't win them all. I wish other corps would have that mentality.
ragewardog SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 102	Posted - 2014.01.03 14:00:00 - [42] - Quote Mikey The Bandaid wrote: ragewardog wrote: ITs sad really you have corps like STB who fight and never lock anything.. then you have trash like pradox one who dont even show if you do attack there districts because the timers they set are so dumb they cant even put a team together... then you have rofl an alliance that has locked there districts for a very long time just making isk off them districts never needing to fight for them.. VC is a good pc team but yet they still lock there districts which is sad... I just dont get it my guys want pc every day so we try to give them that pc but corps that lock there districts do so to what make isk for what your not going to use it in pc lol damn scum I agree. I know that our corps don't exactly have the best relations, also with DDB. One thing I hope you guys know about us at DL is we don't participate in this nonsense, and we greatly discourage this kind of act. One thing we do is fight, you guys know that. Didn't matter the opponent, we show up and fight out hardest with the guys we have available. Of course we lose some, can't win them all. I wish other corps would have that mentality. o7 yep if you cant fight for it when it is attacked you shouldn't have it...
Mikey The Bandaid D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 86	Posted - 2014.01.03 14:10:00 - [43] - Quote ragewardog wrote: Mikey The Bandaid wrote: ragewardog wrote: ITs sad really you have corps like STB who fight and never lock anything.. then you have trash like pradox one who dont even show if you do attack there districts because the timers they set are so dumb they cant even put a team together... then you have rofl an alliance that has locked there districts for a very long time just making isk off them districts never needing to fight for them.. VC is a good pc team but yet they still lock there districts which is sad... I just dont get it my guys want pc every day so we try to give them that pc but corps that lock there districts do so to what make isk for what your not going to use it in pc lol damn scum I agree. I know that our corps don't exactly have the best relations, also with DDB. One thing I hope you guys know about us at DL is we don't participate in this nonsense, and we greatly discourage this kind of act. One thing we do is fight, you guys know that. Didn't matter the opponent, we show up and fight out hardest with the guys we have available. Of course we lose some, can't win them all. I wish other corps would have that mentality. o7 yep if you cant fight for it when it is attacked you shouldn't have it... Sometimes I wonder what people expect when they first obtain a district. Lol. It's a war game...
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 104	Posted - 2014.01.03 16:44:00 - [44] - Quote Our you can just sub out your corp and hire ringers to fight your battles to each his own i guess. The clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy"s will to be imposed upon him. Sun Tzu
Jin no kami Valor Coalition 22	Posted - 2014.01.03 17:02:00 - [45] - Quote Its a tactic in this game what would you do to prevent district locking. Background checks of corps ccp checking to see who leads the attacking corp ccp checking to see how many ppl are in the attacking corp ccp checking isk background of attacking corp wire taps psn checks by ccp if it isn't that serious why make a thread about it =ƒÖê=ƒÖë=ƒÖè
Ares 514 D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 222	Posted - 2014.01.03 17:03:00 - [46] - Quote ragewardog wrote: Mikey The Bandaid wrote: Skittles McDuckett wrote: Everyone knows this is a problem. CCP has yet to come up with a fix. Bottom line is that the community has carebeared the issue for too long. Here is my stance, it is below a cheap tactic. It allows you to hold land without fear of losing it. This destroys the ideas behind PC. It will no longer be tolerated. Locking more than 50% of your districts with friendly attacks or habitually locking your districts with friendly attacks will not be tolerated. If you are locking more than 50% of your districts, you can consider any blue status NULL AND VOID. Failure to stop locking districts within 72 hours of OP will earn you red status and your districts will be attacked when/if they come online. I DO NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE FRIENDS WITH OR IF YOUR ALLIANCE HAS BLUE STATUS WITH GOD HIMSELF. This is the cheapest of tactics and should not be tolerated by the community. After the 72 hour grace period expires, anyone that participates in attacks can do so without the fear of it affecting alliance standings. I would appreciate the community supporting this movement. We need take action ourselves if CCP is slow to act. If you manage to snipe a district and get an attack on it, please let us know and we will provide as much support as we possibly can. If anyone can give us assistance with getting districts sniped after the 72 grace period, it would be appreciated. Please give the named corporations 72 hours to comply before you launch any attacks. Current known offenders(if you are mentioned and your districts are under hostile attack, please advise): Pradox One (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Valor Coalition (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Fatal Absolution (All districts locked with friendly attacks, I honestly am surprised, you guys are good enough to hold your own against anyone, why lock your districts) KEQ (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Titans of Pheonix (All districts locked with friendly attacks) War Ravens (88% of districts under friendly attack) Corporations that have complied since OP: The Third Day Hey, look at that. Something we actually agree on! District locking is almost as dumb as PFC. Down with the district lockers! what I agree with dark legion wow this most be a bad thing DOWN WITH DISTRICT LOCKING SCUM!!!!! What?! I agree with SVER?! Wow, a dark day indeed! :) Please fix the mic bubble bug...
Ares 514 D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 222	Posted - 2014.01.03 17:04:00 - [47] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: To clarify things: When the war started, ALL of our districts were attacked with large amounts of clones. We won some battles and lost some. When we got a win in, we locked districts we won on to cover clone regeneration. Once we had 300 or more clones on a district, we stopped locking the district. The districts went back online again during the war and they were attacked again. We went through several of these cycles during the war. This was a valid tactic. We were not abusing the system by locking with a friendly attack and no-showing it, guaranteeing that we got the money (36 mil, we capped the points and we lost the 36 mil) from clones packs back. The issue with locking districts arises when it is utilized as a tactic to prevent ANY attacks for prolonged periods of time. Locking districts to cover things like a holiday or a short period of time that you will not have the number to field a team is acceptable as long as you are not abusing the mechanic to get all your isk back. Taking a district out of circulation should have monetary consequences(just like a standard lock takes away a clone regen). I have the utmost respect for FA. They are a good group of clones and are great opponents. I pointed this out in the OP, this is not meant to turn into a flame war. I am attempting to point out abusers of a game mechanic and gain support from the community for our movement. Haha, i call bullshit. District locking in any form is pretty stupid, especially when you have multiple districts. But keep justifying your actions DDB, cause the sun shines out of your * ;) Please fix the mic bubble bug...**
Ares 514 D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 222	Posted - 2014.01.03 17:07:00 - [48] - Quote I'd like to say now I finally get why Molon Labe stopped locking all their districts. I couldn't figure it out. Good thing you guys are so close and gave them the heads up so they could stop locking all their districts before this thread. If you're actually going to try to do this you should try to take their districts for the amount of time they abused this mechanic. Watch out for Fussion Commander. Still, CCP needs to fix this, it's too much hassle trying to jump in on corps locking their own districts. Please fix the mic bubble bug...
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 106	Posted - 2014.01.03 17:59:00 - [49] - Quote dear skittles, when did DDB become so good at dust that they can police all of molden heath? you guys cant even beat KEQ without 8+ AE ringers. if you read the forums thats a shame because KEQ is all scrubs. eat a bowl of d*cks
kayn TARON SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 27	Posted - 2014.01.03 18:50:00 - [50] - Quote ragewardog wrote: ITs sad really you have corps like STB who fight and never lock anything.. then you have trash like pradox one who dont even show if you do attack there districts because the timers they set are so dumb they cant even put a team together... then you have rofl an alliance that has locked there districts for a very long time just making isk off them districts never needing to fight for them.. VC is a good pc team but yet they still lock there districts which is sad... I just dont get it my guys want pc every day so we try to give them that pc but corps that lock there districts do so to what make isk for what your not going to use it in pc lol damn scum Agreed, there are so many really good players in STB that don't even get the opportunity to do PC because of all the district locking. I can see it done modestly if you have a crap ton of them but anything over 50% of your districts is uncalled for no matter what excuse there is. Albeit I do understand locking to avoiding trying to do PC on holidays where we should be with our familys so that dedicated players like myself don't have to interrupt that to defend a district on say Xmas. Good example of this is Eliters whom attacked Molon on Thanksgiving day right during prime dinner hours for us Americans. Needless to say even with hardly anyone on they still got crushed lol. Dust is marketed as an FPS/MMO. Can you name me one MMO that does not have a functional online friends list or PVE? lol

pdiddy anfama KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 90	Posted - 2014.01.03 20:23:00 - [51] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: Everyone knows this is a problem. CCP has yet to come up with a fix. Bottom line is that the community has carebeared the issue for too long. Here is my stance, it is below a cheap tactic. It allows you to hold land without fear of losing it. This destroys the ideas behind PC. It will no longer be tolerated. Locking more than 50% of your districts with friendly attacks or habitually locking your districts with friendly attacks will not be tolerated. If you are locking more than 50% of your districts, you can consider any blue status NULL AND VOID. Failure to stop locking districts within 72 hours of OP will earn you red status and your districts will be attacked when/if they come online. I DO NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE FRIENDS WITH OR IF YOUR ALLIANCE HAS BLUE STATUS WITH GOD HIMSELF. This is the cheapest of tactics and should not be tolerated by the community. After the 72 hour grace period expires, anyone that participates in attacks can do so without the fear of it affecting alliance standings. I would appreciate the community supporting this movement. We need take action ourselves if CCP is slow to act. If you manage to snipe a district and get an attack on it, please let us know and we will provide as much support as we possibly can. If anyone can give us assistance with getting districts sniped after the 72 grace period, it would be appreciated. Please give the named corporations 72 hours to comply before you launch any attacks. Current known offenders(if you are mentioned and your districts are under hostile attack, please advise): Pradox One (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Valor Coalition (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Fatal Absolution (All districts locked with friendly attacks, I honestly am surprised, you guys are good enough to hold your own against anyone, why lock your districts) KEQ (All districts locked with friendly attacks, known district lockers) Titans of Pheonix (All districts locked with friendly attacks) War Ravens (88% of districts under friendly attack) Corporations that have complied since OP: The Third Day Haha coming from someone who can't hold their district without calling in ringers when they are about to lose a district. What is the difference AE delivers districts to Nyian Cian to just change timers, so no one in the US. Can attack without setting their alarm clocks. Very funny this is no different from having a locked district. CCP should fix the lag issue in PC and then we might open our districts.
Skittles McDuckett Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 209	Posted - 2014.01.03 20:24:00 - [52] - Quote Dust User wrote: dear skittles, when did DDB become so good at dust that they can police all of molden heath? you guys cant even beat KEQ without 8+ AE ringers. if you read the forums thats a shame because KEQ is all scrubs. eat a bowl of d*cks Just to clarify things, this isn't about DDB. This is a community movement. Skittles McDuckett, DDB director - TASTE THE RAINBOW!!!
pdiddy anfama KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 90	Posted - 2014.01.03 20:27:00 - [53] - Quote You should change your corp name from Dem Durrty Boyz to Dem Durrty Sanchezs'
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 108	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:22:00 - [54] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: Dust User wrote: dear skittles, when did DDB become so good at dust that they can police all of molden heath? you guys cant even beat KEQ without 8+ AE ringers. if you read the forums thats a shame because KEQ is all scrubs. eat a bowl of d*cks Just to clarify things, this isn't about DDB. This is a community movement. Ok that's cool just was starting to sound like you think you run all of dust and we would have to curb that noise. Its more that PC is a broken game mode and we don't care much about it till they fix it. The clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy"s will to be imposed upon him. Sun Tzu
A-P-P-Baby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 55	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:33:00 - [55] - Quote Dust User wrote: KEQ is all scrubs.
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution 3564	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:36:00 - [56] - Quote Fiddlestaxp wrote: Working as intended. Locking districts is NO FUN and is even more like a job than the rest of the game. It only makes sense that you get paid for it I'd rather win against AE than have those **** talking guys come to the forums and complain about it :/ Logi ak.0 Best Logi :D
TheWee BabySeamus Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 75	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:39:00 - [57] - Quote pdiddy anfama wrote: You should change your corp name from Dem Durrty Boyz to Dem Durrty Sanchezs' That kinda has a nice ring to it Wee Baby Seamus-------------->DDB Director & #1 Sex chat operator
TheWee BabySeamus Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 75	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:40:00 - [58] - Quote Ares 514 wrote: Skittles McDuckett wrote: To clarify things: When the war started, ALL of our districts were attacked with large amounts of clones. We won some battles and lost some. When we got a win in, we locked districts we won on to cover clone regeneration. Once we had 300 or more clones on a district, we stopped locking the district. The districts went back online again during the war and they were attacked again. We went through several of these cycles during the war. This was a valid tactic. We were not abusing the system by locking with a friendly attack and no-showing it, guaranteeing that we got the money (36 mil, we capped the points and we lost the 36 mil) from clones packs back. The issue with locking districts arises when it is utilized as a tactic to prevent ANY attacks for prolonged periods of time. Locking districts to cover things like a holiday or a short period of time that you will not have the number to field a team is acceptable as long as you are not abusing the mechanic to get all your isk back. Taking a district out of circulation should have monetary consequences(just like a standard lock takes away a clone regen). I have the utmost respect for FA. They are a good group of clones and are great opponents. I pointed this out in the OP, this is not meant to turn into a flame war. I am attempting to point out abusers of a game mechanic and gain support from the community for our movement. Haha, i call bullshit. District locking in any form is pretty stupid, especially when you have multiple districts. But keep justifying your actions DDB, cause the sun shines out of your *** ;) huh? Wee Baby Seamus-------------->DDB Director & #1 Sex chat operator
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 107	Posted - 2014.01.03 21:47:00 - [59] - Quote Skittles McDuckett wrote: Dust User wrote: dear skittles, when did DDB become so good at dust that they can police all of molden heath? you guys cant even beat KEQ without 8+ AE ringers. if you read the forums thats a shame because KEQ is all scrubs. eat a bowl of d*cks Just to clarify things, this isn't about DDB. This is a community movement. so youre doing this because its abusing game mechanics? so is it safe to assume that after you have resolved this problem your next move is rallying the "community" against your alliance mates AE? in case you never knew they are well documented abusers of game mechanics.
pdiddy anfama KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 92	Posted - 2014.01.03 22:10:00 - [60] - Quote Yes the abused game mechanic is freaking lag... We have developed a new plan to execute ... Will it work I don't know, but we will find out. CCP FIX THE LAG. IE FRAMERATE DROPS.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.