|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3553
   |
Posted - 2013.12.30 03:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Everyone knows the power of the rail/scrambler rifles at long range combat they shred everything in front of them long range, as they should, but this power isn't restricted to just long range combat.
Simply put: the rail and scrambler rifles are both too powerfull in CQC.
So how to balence these rifles so it limits their CQC use, while not effecting their preformance at longer ranges?
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3553
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 03:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
MR-NASTY wrote:Do you really have to post these dumb let's talk dust posts about every stupid thing you can think of?
Yes, I prefer them over 'this **** sucks' threads.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3553
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 03:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:RR and SCR are both fine.
This is pure T_T
Out with you Amarrian!
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3556
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 03:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
jordy mack wrote:I would think a zoomier scope might stop some of the CQCQQ.
... or u could just stop the QQ..
Sorry I'm not the kind of guy to just watch something continue to be wrong. 
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3561
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 04:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
MR-NASTY wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:MR-NASTY wrote:Do you really have to post these dumb let's talk dust posts about every stupid thing you can think of? Yes, I prefer them over 'this **** sucks' threads. You are just trying to farm likes. I guess its better than searching for your name. Yes I've seen your name come up as the most searched term several times. I can't imagine that many people would search for your name so I assume it you searching your own name .... lol kinda sad.
I can honestly say with 100% certainty that I don't make these threads to farm likes sir I'm sure many, like yourself, have gained an irrational hatred for me through them so 'popularity' isn't the goal.
I have these likes because I make these threads, I don't make the threads to get likes.
Hell take the likes away and I'll still make them, just as I did when I started.
I suppose people like yourself feel the need to post in threads like this because I'm one of the more 'well known' players, I'm sure you wouldn't have posted that comment if I'd been on an alt, or if another newer player had made it.
As for the name serch thing, yes I do, I find it the best way to find replys to my post.
I'm thinking the one who is trying to farm likes here is you good sir.
Good day.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3563
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 04:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
MR-NASTY wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:MR-NASTY wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:MR-NASTY wrote:Do you really have to post these dumb let's talk dust posts about every stupid thing you can think of? Yes, I prefer them over 'this **** sucks' threads. You are just trying to farm likes. I guess its better than searching for your name. Yes I've seen your name come up as the most searched term several times. I can't imagine that many people would search for your name so I assume it you searching your own name .... lol kinda sad. I can honestly say with 100% certainty that I don't make these threads to farm likes sir I'm sure many, like yourself, have gained an irrational hatred for me through them so 'popularity' isn't the goal. I have these likes because I make these threads, I don't make the threads to get likes. Hell take the likes away and I'll still make them, just as I did when I started. I suppose people like yourself feel the need to post in threads like this because I'm one of the more 'well known' players, I'm sure you wouldn't have posted that comment if I'd been on an alt, or if another newer player had made it. As for the name serch thing, yes I do, I find it the best way to find replys to my post. I'm thinking the one who is trying to farm likes here is you good sir. Good day. "Well known" for stupid posts maybe, certainly not your skills. And searching your name to find replies to your posts is really dumb since it does it for you now. I must have hit a nerve? Please stop posting dumb ideas every few hours to try to make yourself a "known player"
I hardly think that trying to balence a weapon is a dumb idea sir.
As for being well known for stupid post, perhaps, but hey they're all made with the perpous of improvement for the game we playyes, not every I'idea is a good one after all.
And no, no nerves hit here sir, it's simply a post made by someone who dislikes my threads you're not the first, and surly not the last.
As for trying to make myself a known player, not at all, the point of these threads is to improve the game, and make a thread that's not another 'screw this game' based, not for popularity.
I f I am I am, if I'm not I'm not.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3563
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 04:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:Everyone knows the power of the rail/scrambler rifles at long range combat they shred everything in front of them long range, as they should, but this power isn't restricted to just long range combat.
Simply put: the rail and scrambler rifles are both too powerfull in CQC.
So how to balence these rifles so it limits their CQC use, while not effecting their preformance at longer ranges?
So let me get this straight, you want to nerf 2 of the 3 only rifles that have actual drawbacks. And you want to leave the two rifles with no drawbacks, the combat and assault rifle, alone?  By the way, scrambler and rail rifle are mechanically unideal for CQC.
Not nerf, balence, weapons should be good at what they're good at and bad at what they'er bad at.
The MD for example: great on level ground or up high, but catch one at long range or from above and the masshole is done for.
The other rifles have the drawback of shorter ranges, though I think the CR could do with a clip size nerf, but they're not the focus of this thread, if you wish for me to make a thread on um just ask and I'll be happy to do so.
P.S: sorry for the late reply, was dealing with the other guy.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3619
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 08:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:I don't get the hipfire spreads on most of these guns in the game. It seems the longer the range the weapon has, the more accurate the hip fire is.
Besides the sniper! (Thank the Amarrian's fake god)
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3620
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 09:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
HYENAKILLER X wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:Everyone knows the power of the rail/scrambler rifles at long range combat they shred everything in front of them long range, as they should, but this power isn't restricted to just long range combat.
Simply put: the rail and scrambler rifles are both too powerfull in CQC.
So how to balence these rifles so it limits their CQC use, while not effecting their preformance at longer ranges?
ars still beat both in cqc imo. Combat rifles are harder to use but if you have the skill they can prolly match rails at ranged and definitely in cqc. Scramblers are hype imo. The one thing I think people need to understand is that its absolutely guaranteed there will be a best rifle. Its like that in every game. This game right now has 4 very well balanced rifles.
Sir I would not describe any of the rifles to be well balenced when looking at all weapons in our arsenal.
Just me though.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3625
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 19:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
bump
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
|
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3628
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:08:00 -
[11] - Quote
BATTOUSAI THE MANSLAYER wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:Everyone knows the power of the rail/scrambler rifles at long range combat they shred everything in front of them long range, as they should, but this power isn't restricted to just long range combat.
Simply put: the rail and scrambler rifles are both too powerfull in CQC.
So how to balence these rifles so it limits their CQC use, while not effecting their preformance at longer ranges?
This thread is kind of funny since I killed you with my Viziam the other day after you dropped an RE on my head from a up on a pipe 
Sounds like me...
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3635
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 03:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Holy **** it's not complicated.
As max range increases, DPS should decrease. Doesn't eve have this system?
Certainly.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3635
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 03:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nitrobeacon wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:Everyone knows the power of the rail/scrambler rifles at long range combat they shred everything in front of them long range, as they should, but this power isn't restricted to just long range combat.
Simply put: the rail and scrambler rifles are both too powerfull in CQC.
So how to balence these rifles so it limits their CQC use, while not effecting their preformance at longer ranges?
MR-NASTY received more likes, I guess I'll agree with him.
*butthurt*
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3718
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
bump
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3722
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:17:00 -
[15] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:jordy mack wrote:I would think a zoomier scope might stop some of the CQCQQ.
... or u could just stop the QQ.. Sorry I'm not the kind of guy to just watch something continue to be wrong. Well you didn't talk about the CR , it has range , DPS and is great in CQC so that's a triple threat and is the ONLY gun out of all the AR 's , even the SR cant say that , that is capable of doing so . That's wrong but I guess being Mimi you just can't see that huh ??? 
I've already addressed this in another post, in this thread, the CR is nowhere near as powerful as the RR or SCR at long range, as it should be, that being it's downside I'd also like to see a clip size reduction to the CR as well to balance it's massive ROF.
As I said to the other player: If you want me to make a thread about the CR please say so, but this thread is not about said weapon.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3726
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 09:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote:Aisha Ctarl wrote:RR and SCR are both fine.
This is pure T_T I would even like to add the CR, RR and SCR are all fine, my CR outperforms any other gun on the field in CQC, my Rail Rifle does the same and my Scrambler has been doing it since Uprising. And at medium to long Ranges, the CR, RR and SCR all outperform the other guns shooting back at me aswell. Seening they all perform the same in my hands, maybe its not the guns ? Quote: that being it's downside I'd also like to see a clip size reduction to the CR as well to balance it's massive ROF. And by doing so you basically want this gun not to be able to kill anything at range ?
I don't see how a slight reduction in clip size=can't kill anything at range.
Unless someone can't aim a clip reduction shouldn't effect the weapon so much to make it unviable, while giving it a visable downside.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
|
|
| |
|