Spent the majority of the match in a Scout suit getting behind this Rail Tanker who was spawn camping the outpost in an Ambush match. Threw three remote explosives on his back end and detonated. It didn't kill him and he actually had his armor repairer recover the damage, not dying once that entire round.

So my question is: Considering the level of difficulty there is just to get the damned things -on- the tank... Should Remote Explosives outright kill them with just three?

Things to consider:

- Tanks, like all vehicles, have third person view. Depending on the playstyle, this makes it nigh impossible to 'sneak up' on a tank.
- Higher tiered remote explosives do allow you to have more active at once but only the Prototype remote explosives allow you to carry more than three at any given time.
- 1.7 recently implemented the ability to stick remote explosives to objects, including vehicles, so the ground work is already present.

Except for the fact that they warn you when you're near them. I don't mean they should godly but they should be around where RE's are at. I mean 750 damage x 3 = 2250, that's just not going to cut it. Putting it on par with RE would have you go 4500 which would be able to wipe out tankers who aren't paying attention, weakened or are just chassis fits. Buffing proxis is the obvious solution to tank spam and would effectively allow people to set up perimeters and traps for HAVs.

Breach RE.

3500 damage, 0.5m radius.

R/Es can already kill HAVs. Sure, you can stick them on the back of the HAV, but that's actually prone to fail. The ground with PMs is a much better alternative. Battlefield tactics are pretty solid.

And the problem with that would be?

Any way I know 5000 is way to mutch I just took that figure so ppl understand that if you buff remotes regardless to whatever , they make non whatsoever impact on the usege of it against infantry.

But I do agree on that 5000 is over the top was just trying to get a point across.

Regards