| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3239
   |
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
Still not as useful as they could be for vehicle destruction, more useful now, but still not as much as they could be.
Just saying........
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Kaltos Darksbane
Shadow Wolves Inc.
128
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
At higher levels we should be able to carry more than we currently can. Say advanced=5, proto=7
Dust 514?...............More like Dust 5150.
I support SP rollover!
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
34
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Agreed, but fun nevertheless.-That is all.
'Don't talk to strangers, shoot them.' Snow LOCKOUT
Scout Devotee.
You'd just LOVE to think it was the wind.
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
34
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
10 remotes. It would be great...
'Don't talk to strangers, shoot them.' Snow LOCKOUT
Scout Devotee.
You'd just LOVE to think it was the wind.
|
Tch Tch
Red Shirts Away Team
80
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Are proximity mines sticky?
If so you could put them on as auto anti theft devices... Or on the side and if you get close enough meep meep... LOLAV which only has to get close to destroy ya... Or park near where a HAV will round a corner and boom.
Turrent - the sound a tankers pants makes when he finds out the four swarm militia doing squats around him aren't AFK.
|
Cyrius Li-Moody
The New Age Outlaws
WINMATAR.
2325
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
It'd be sweet if remotes would kind of track to a vehicle when you tossed them so you could throw them from a reasonable distance instead of humping distance.
Youtuber. Your friendly neighborhood whiskey-fueled merc.
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3240
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:It'd be sweet if remotes would kind of track to a vehicle when you tossed them so you could throw them from a reasonable distance instead of humping distance.
But I like humping distance, that's where I use my Nova Knives.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Repe Susi
Rautaleijona
Top Men.
837
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong.
Smeehf.
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
34
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
Scouts toss them at least 6meters, maybe cause we're so fast...XD
'Don't talk to strangers, shoot them.' Snow LOCKOUT
Scout Devotee.
You'd just LOVE to think it was the wind.
|
Cosgar
ParagonX
8814
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
Someone tried to murder taxi me the other day. When he grazed me and hit a wall, I tossed an RE on his hood. When it detonated, the driver, passenger, and gunner died, but the LAV was intact. I hacked the LAV and drove down the road until I got blown up by a rail rifle. Dafuq?
Also, 1~3 REs planted on the back of a HAV should destroy it when the modules are down depending on tier, fit, and armor/shield tank.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
|
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
472
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
only buff to remotes needed would be to increase the amount you carry to match the amount you can have active
its currently
3/3
3/4
4/5
needs to be
3/3
4/4
5/5 |
Cosgar
ParagonX
8814
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:22:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:only buff to remotes needed would be to increase the amount you carry to match the amount you can have active
its currently
3/3
3/4
4/5
needs to be
3/3
4/4
5/5
I agree max active/carried need to be the same, but more RE's carried = more forum whining and more nerfing. Increasing the damage by 500 on all the tiers might help. The damn things already OHK any dropsuit, so what's the difference between 1500 damage and 2000 damage?
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Ulme Mees
Eesti Leegion
69
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Repe Susi wrote:The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong.
I made a proto BOMBER fit, I lay down boundless proxysis + f45 proxys and then lay down boundless remote exps and f45 remote exps..... Then lurk around the corner waiting for that sad tanker to come into my trap, once i see the proxys explode (they dont kill the tank tho) I trigger my remotes and voila tank is dead.
Tested this on 4-5 times now and killed a tank every time.
Fear is a disease!
|
Seigfried Warheit
112
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:only buff to remotes needed would be to increase the amount you carry to match the amount you can have active
its currently
3/3
3/4
4/5
needs to be
3/3
4/4
5/5 I agree max active/carried need to be the same, but more RE's carried = more forum whining and more nerfing. Increasing the damage by 500 on all the tiers might help. The damn things already OHK any dropsuit, so what's the difference between 1500 damage and 2000 damage?
The difference is more noob tanker QQ about REs....I havent seen any real tanker complain just the nooby ones |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3242
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ulme Mees wrote:Repe Susi wrote:The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong. I made a proto BOMBER fit, I lay down boundless proxysis + f45 proxys and then lay down boundless remote exps and f45 remote exps..... Then lurk around the corner waiting for that sad tanker to come into my trap, once i see the proxys explode (they dont kill the tank tho) I trigger my remotes and voila tank is dead. Tested this on 4-5 times now and killed a tank every time.
I don't even have 2 equipment slots, let alone 4....
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Cosgar
ParagonX
8814
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Seigfried Warheit wrote:Cosgar wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:only buff to remotes needed would be to increase the amount you carry to match the amount you can have active
its currently
3/3
3/4
4/5
needs to be
3/3
4/4
5/5 I agree max active/carried need to be the same, but more RE's carried = more forum whining and more nerfing. Increasing the damage by 500 on all the tiers might help. The damn things already OHK any dropsuit, so what's the difference between 1500 damage and 2000 damage? The difference is more noob tanker QQ about REs....I havent seen any real tanker complain just the nooby ones
Better than infantry crying about RE 514 or whatever the hell they'll call it. If you're that stupid to let a guy run up on you and lay REs on your hull, you were asking for it. This is why I have at least one gunner on all my tanks or equip a scanner.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Repe Susi
Rautaleijona
Top Men.
837
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 07:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ulme Mees wrote:Repe Susi wrote:The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong. I made a proto BOMBER fit, I lay down boundless proxysis + f45 proxys and then lay down boundless remote exps and f45 remote exps..... Then lurk around the corner waiting for that sad tanker to come into my trap, once i see the proxys explode (they dont kill the tank tho) I trigger my remotes and voila tank is dead. Tested this on 4-5 times now and killed a tank every time.
Too bad it's way too expensive and limited fit for the gains. :/
Smeehf.
|
Thang Bausch
Pierrot Le Fou Industries
77
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 08:15:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ulme Mees wrote:Repe Susi wrote:The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong. I made a proto BOMBER fit, I lay down boundless proxysis + f45 proxys and then lay down boundless remote exps and f45 remote exps..... Then lurk around the corner waiting for that sad tanker to come into my trap, once i see the proxys explode (they dont kill the tank tho) I trigger my remotes and voila tank is dead. Tested this on 4-5 times now and killed a tank every time.
I would like to see proxy explosions detonate any remote explosives in their blast range.
|
Vitharr Foebane
Blood Money Mercenaries
416
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 09:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Thang Bausch wrote:Ulme Mees wrote:Repe Susi wrote:The old problem with proximity explosives is still there; They do not detonate fast enough.
After 1.7 I have seen 3 vehicles blown up by proxies. And they had all been damaged prior to that.
When laying down a mine field does not work even as a deterrent to tankers, something's wrong. I made a proto BOMBER fit, I lay down boundless proxysis + f45 proxys and then lay down boundless remote exps and f45 remote exps..... Then lurk around the corner waiting for that sad tanker to come into my trap, once i see the proxys explode (they dont kill the tank tho) I trigger my remotes and voila tank is dead. Tested this on 4-5 times now and killed a tank every time. I would like to see proxy explosions detonate any remote explosives in their blast range.
*checks for scrubby tankers*
They do 
TBA IS NOT A NAME!
At least give the heavy laser a name so we know you MIGHT be working on it.
|
RedZer0 MK1
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
135
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 09:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
The tanks are to fast to plant more than 1or 2 RE on them. Only the most distracted/unaware tankers get all three. If prox triggered remotes, the proxies should just do RE damage. Other wise people would stack them anyway, and nothing would really be different. Maybe a variant where you only get 1, but it does massive damage. Perhaps it could be a timed one instead of remote. |
|
|
Guinevere Bravo
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
512
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 09:34:00 -
[21] - Quote
They need a 'throw' added ALA C4 on MW2. Maybe the longer you hold the deploy the further you could throw them?. |
Keri Starlight
0uter.Heaven
1986
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 09:47:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mines are easy to avoid for HAVs because of the built-in detector, but LAVs are pretty much doomed if they are going full speed.
REs are quite good.
But... Kamikaze bomb-LAVs are f***ing effective! I lost 2 tanks to them since 1.7 and I saw friendly tanks going down as well. The second one was actually tragic because I noticed it right behind me, I activated my nitrous, but when I finally managed to turn my turret around, he was so damn close that I couldn't even shoot without blowing myself up!
At that point I did the only thing I could think of: I jumped out 
That leaves a bit like this: 
And a bit like this: 
"I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
|
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
320
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 10:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
slightly off topic but it's important to formulate my response... do vehicles have a mass stat currently? |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3249
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 10:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:slightly off topic but it's important to formulate my response... do vehicles have a mass stat currently?
Sorry I don't know, you'd need to ask a CPM or blue tag.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3276
|
Posted - 2013.12.19 00:59:00 -
[25] - Quote
Bump
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Grimm Mjolnir
Crusaders Of The Abyss
33
|
Posted - 2013.12.19 01:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:Still not as useful as they could be for vehicle destruction, more useful now, but still not as much as they could be.
Just saying........
you sound BuTThurTT |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2246
|
Posted - 2013.12.19 01:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:
I agree max active/carried need to be the same, but more RE's carried = more forum whining and more nerfing. Increasing the damage by 500 on all the tiers might help. The damn things already OHK any dropsuit, so what's the difference between 1500 damage and 2000 damage?
What's the difference?
Vehicles 
Why must vehicle pilots try to ruin DUST 514 for everyone?
Do they really want to go 60/0 that badly?
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3276
|
Posted - 2013.12.19 01:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Grimm Mjolnir wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:Still not as useful as they could be for vehicle destruction, more useful now, but still not as much as they could be.
Just saying........ you sound BuTThurTT
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3290
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 05:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bump
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |