|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
   |
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Yes really.
Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles.
Everybody wins.
HTFU
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Remove AV. Considering it takes around 3-5 people to take down my 72k tank, It's practically a non issue. Blasters however are more effective than any infantry weapon. So basically, tanks get all the power.
LOL
RND infantry trying to boast about being a MLT tanker? You wouldn't survive me at all.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Honestly its a reasonable idea and the blaster turret has always been in a ridiculous idea, should have been essentially a big ass plasma cannon instead
Of course you'd agree with that.
But then we have to lose all Gallente rifles, too.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:Blaster turrets have gotten really silly, lately.
The main problem is how many rounds each clip holds. Rail guns and missiles are reasonable. (9-12 rounds.) Blasters on the other hand, are downright stupid. It should be capped at 50 per clip.
Try tanking for a week with just a blaster, then come back and tell me you want blaster magazines capped at 50.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:Reduce RoF and give us a plasma-cannon turret.
Do you even tank?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Remove AV. they did
You're only saying that because you relied on a 400m lock on range crutch.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Yes really.
Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles.
Everybody wins. I like this.
Of course you like it, you relied on the 400m lock on crutch while you had it.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Yes really.
Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles.
Everybody wins. HTFU I did, I called in a Soma, activated a hardener and damage mod and laughed my way to easy kills.
I won't believe someone like you until I see video.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Remove AV. Considering it takes around 3-5 people to take down my 72k tank, It's practically a non issue. Blasters however are more effective than any infantry weapon. So basically, tanks get all the power. LOL RND infantry trying to boast about being a MLT tanker? You wouldn't survive me at all. I took down 5 Maddys and a Gunlogi in a single match with that tank.
Again, I'll believe you when I see video.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Honestly its a reasonable idea and the blaster turret has always been in a ridiculous idea, should have been essentially a big ass plasma cannon instead Of course you'd agree with that. But then we have to lose all Gallente rifles, too. False comparison. Assault Rifles can't do **** against tanks.
They're not supposed to.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:calisk galern wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Remove AV. they did You're only saying that because you relied on a 400m lock on range crutch. No, he's saying that because my friend has a Maddy that can passively out repair constant volleys from a single swarm.
It's called 2 complex heavy armor repairers and an enhanced.
Guess what, it doesn't work against tanks.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:33:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:
Give me a capture card.
Most tankers are **** is what I learned from this update.
They rely too much on crutches and when an infantry player applies what he learned from infantry to tanks he beats up tanks left and right.
LOL crutches? What crutches have we had? The Sagaris and Surya were removed because infantry tried to solo tanks with MLT Starter Fits, found out they couldn't, tanks pounded each other to kingdom come, infantry said that wasn't fair and wanted to do all that themselves, Uprising dropped, then swarms were buffed and it was the dark ages of tanking, now tanks finally see the light, and you're all not happy with the changes YOU forced on CCP.
We were fine rail gunning each other all day, but nooooo, that's not fair for you, infantry is supposed to do everything in the game. ARs are supposed to kill tanks, and so are locus grenades.
Please, go to Call of Duty. There aren't any vehicles for you to worry about, stop trying to destroy my play style, I don't tell infantry how they're supposed to do their own role, don't think you have the right to tell me how to do mine.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Honestly its a reasonable idea and the blaster turret has always been in a ridiculous idea, should have been essentially a big ass plasma cannon instead Of course you'd agree with that. But then we have to lose all Gallente rifles, too. False comparison. Assault Rifles can't do **** against tanks. They're not supposed to. Indeed. So your comparison is dumb.
So why do you want to remove the best anti-infantry turret from the game?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
So why do you want to remove the best anti-infantry turret from the game?
If AV is hugely ineffective against tanks, tanks should be hugely ineffective against infantry. Seems fair to me. AV kills tanks from once in a while, just like railguns and missiles kill people from once in a while.
How is it fair?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Cat Merc wrote:
Give me a capture card.
Most tankers are **** is what I learned from this update.
They rely too much on crutches and when an infantry player applies what he learned from infantry to tanks he beats up tanks left and right.
LOL crutches? What crutches have we had? The Sagaris and Surya were removed because infantry tried to solo tanks with MLT Starter Fits, found out they couldn't, tanks pounded each other to kingdom come, infantry said that wasn't fair and wanted to do all that themselves, Uprising dropped, then swarms were buffed and it was the dark ages of tanking, now tanks finally see the light, and you're all not happy with the changes YOU forced on CCP. We were fine rail gunning each other all day, but nooooo, that's not fair for you, infantry is supposed to do everything in the game. ARs are supposed to kill tanks, and so are locus grenades. Please, go to Call of Duty. There aren't any vehicles for you to worry about, stop trying to destroy my play style, I don't tell infantry how they're supposed to do their own role, don't think you have the right to tell me how to do mine. Sorry what? Back in Chromo tanks went 67/0 easily, I used to run around in a proto swarms squad and we got wiped often even though we were all shooting it and then hiding when it turned it's turret. Had a scout somewhere else telling us where his turret is facing. Uprising tanks were bad, 1.7 tanks are too good, get over it.
So you should've skilled into tanks during Chromosome. Back then, core skills worked for both infantry and vehicles. But of course, that's too hard to do.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 06:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
So why do you want to remove the best anti-infantry turret from the game?
If AV is hugely ineffective against tanks, tanks should be hugely ineffective against infantry. Seems fair to me. AV kills tanks from once in a while, just like railguns and missiles kill people from once in a while. How is it fair? How is it not fair?
Arguing with you is like talking to a brick wall.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
| |
|