| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1480
   |
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Jason Pearson
3382
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Learn to use proxy mines to keep you safe. Oh and they can't ram you if you're reversing, :D They tap you and it either blows up or sets them off as you're driving away, you take damage but no death.
Oh and it's rarely used in FW, because it bans you.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Everything Dies
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds.
Life is killing me.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2019
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives?
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
339
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with.
You don't need a tanker you need 2 militia tanks to team up on a tank.
Tanker/Logi
Tanks almost fixed.
|
Tectonic Fusion
716
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
What's a crutch :3 is it like an OP spamming weapon like grenades?
Solo Player
Squad status: Locked
|
Jason Pearson
3382
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Everything Dies wrote:...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds.
I still cost 500k :(
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Jason Pearson
3383
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with. You don't need a tanker you need 2 militia tanks to team up on a tank.
lol, if it's a **** tank yeah.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Ranger SnakeBlood
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
250
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. |
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
339
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with. You don't need a tanker you need 2 militia tanks to team up on a tank. lol, if it's a **** tank yeah.
It depends I could take out 3-4 soma's but because of my slow reload if I had two decent sica's I might have a little trouble.
Tanker/Logi
Tanks almost fixed.
|
|
|
Akdhar Saif
Forty-Nine Fedayeen
Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
I took out a tanks shields with three standard Flux grenades 
Or is that really easy to do....
I dunno I'm a noob |
Everything Dies
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
349
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:33:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Everything Dies wrote:...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds. I still cost 500k :(
Why even bother sinking that much money into a tank, currently? The only thing a militia tanker really needs to fear is another tank...but even then, you can still lose one or two and come out of the battle ISK-positive given how dominant tanks are now. Try throwing together the cheapest build you can and see if it really makes a noticeable difference to your performance.
Life is killing me.
|
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic
388
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
You don't have to detonate them anymore? I understand if there is an explosion like an LAV it sets them off, but just running over sets off Remotes?
Are you thinking Proximity Explosives? They do minimal damage and hardeners completely voids them. |
KING CHECKMATE
Scions of Athra
3129
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:36:00 -
[14] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with.
Spkr4theDead is the proof no matter what, until Tanks aren't 100% un-killable ,some tankers wont stop QQing....
SCR User Since release. Charge shot / Aim to the head / Listen to QQ
|
Jason Pearson
3383
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Everything Dies wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Everything Dies wrote:...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds. I still cost 500k :( Why even bother sinking that much money into a tank, currently? The only thing a militia tanker really needs to fear is another tank...but even then, you can still lose one or two and come out of the battle ISK-positive given how dominant tanks are now. Try throwing together the cheapest build you can and see if it really makes a noticeable difference to your performance.
Why? Because I dominate every tank I've faced so far, forget bringing your militia tanks, they can't compete with proper, dare I say it, high calibre tankers, if there are any.
I play fairly, I'm expensive so when I die, It should feel like it hurt me. That risk factors into my gameplay, it's why I love tank battles.
Galvan Nized wrote:You don't have to detonate them anymore? I understand if there is an explosion like an LAV it sets them off, but just running over sets off Remotes?
Are you thinking Proximity Explosives? They do minimal damage and hardeners completely voids them.
Remote Explosives are sticky now.
You can put them on the front of a LAV, ram something and blow up, this damage hits the Tank and if you stack them, you smash the tank instantly.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
286
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote:Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least.
Unfortunately not, I've seen speaker's other posts, yes he is really that dumb. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
8682
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
They've always done that.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3128
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:42:00 -
[18] - Quote
Galvan Nized wrote:You don't have to detonate them anymore? I understand if there is an explosion like an LAV it sets them off, but just running over sets off Remotes?
Are you thinking Proximity Explosives? They do minimal damage and hardeners completely voids them.
I was wondering this as well, REs don't auto detonate last I checked.
Unless you do the whole 'suicide jeep' thing.
And if the OP is complaining about PMs I'll laugh my ass off.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2024
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Slag Emberforge wrote:Ranger SnakeBlood wrote:Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. Unfortunately not, I've seen speaker's other posts, yes he is really that dumb.
He's the Lukeoplast of tankers.
But worse.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1480
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
Everything Dies wrote:...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds.
I love how you all complain that MLT is cheaper than PRO. What would you like for a MLT hull to cost, 300k ISK?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
697
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Slag Emberforge wrote:Ranger SnakeBlood wrote:Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. Unfortunately not, I've seen speaker's other posts, yes he is really that dumb. He's the Lukeoplast of tankers. But worse.
I thought you didn't even know who he was?
Also, "Leukoplast".
Also, OP...
>Cosgar: You know, tanks are actually paper thin once their modules are in cooldown.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1480
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
Atiim wrote:LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives?
You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that a problem even though you called yourself a "tanker."
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1480
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:48:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote:Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least.
Do you not know how to read? I bet you'd be pretty angry if infantry had invisible claymore mines that didn't need to be manually detonated.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Ivy Zalinto
Lo-Tech Solutions Ltd
165
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:48:00 -
[24] - Quote
Honestly quit whining about remote charges...Im a tanker and a scout...tanks have a huge advantage over infantry with charges. Either their jihading you or you arent paying attention to your surroundings enough. Most of the time when i get up against a tank the thing rolls away out of luck and I have to sprint for cover again.
Dedicated scout.
New player tutor; scout instructor
Scrambler Pistol dedication
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2026
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:49:00 -
[25] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that a problem even though you called yourself a "tanker."
Dude NO.
I think I see what your complaining about, and It's one of the lesser known AV secrets.
I'm not telling other pilots what the trick is, nor will I give them any other advice about it.
And you call yourself "AV" yet still want them nerfed even further. Let's not go there.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
3131
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:51:00 -
[26] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that a problem even though you called yourself a "tanker."
Apparently this is something that's happened recently because I've had tanks run over my REs this morning and no detonation.
Seems to me you're mixing them up with PMs because REs do not auto detonate outside of the JJs, they lack the ability to do so.
And if you're complaining about those I restate: I'll laugh my ass off.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Ranger SnakeBlood
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
252
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:52:00 -
[27] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Ranger SnakeBlood wrote:Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. Do you not know how to read? I bet you'd be pretty angry if infantry had invisible claymore mines that didn't need to be manually detonated.
I would indeed if they were invisible but last i checked they are not invisible for infantry nor tanks. |
ALT2 acc
The dyst0pian Corporation
Zero-Day
25
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:53:00 -
[28] - Quote
Atiim wrote:LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives?
those are fine/need buffing |
calvin b
SCAVENGER'S DAUGHTER
1210
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch.
Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with.
I love the RE+LAV= best AV ever. It has failed me a few times, but I will keep trying.
The evil hidden in the name
|
ALT2 acc
The dyst0pian Corporation
Zero-Day
25
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:LMAO Really Dude?
What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that a problem even though you called yourself a "tanker." Dude NO. I think I see what your complaining about, and It's one of the lesser known AV secrets. I'm not telling other pilots what the trick is, nor will I give them any other advice about it. And you call yourself "AV" yet still want them nerfed even further. Let's not go there.
proxy's by remotes |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |