|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1999
   |
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Always funny how tankers demand teamwork to defeat them while still denying to use teamwork by themself. 
"Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me"
-Such is the motto of vehicle pilots
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2003
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 20:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
We are 138 wrote:Atiim wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Always funny how tankers demand teamwork to defeat them while still denying to use teamwork by themself. "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me"-Such is the motto of vehicle pilots Thats a load of crap. Well from my perspective. I work with my squad to push objective with them, they feed me Intel on enemy vehicles they rep me when I need it, I provide cover for them when they need it. A lot of the problem right now is infantry does not under stand how to kill a tank. And the maps..... More city maps an tight spaces rule out most tanks the more congested the more likely some one is gonna sneak up and put remote explosives on my bumper *hint hint*
I don't need your hints. I've been using both HAVs and AV for more than half a year now. And those tactics require a very bad pilot (*hint hint*)
And tell me, what part of that are you required to do? I can (and have) run my tanks solo and still managed to do just as well solo as I would in a coordinated squad.
And I find your reply questioning the legitimacy of my revised statement hilarious considering how tankers have even said in threads that vehicles shouldn't require teamwork, but AV should. So you either have a very biased perspective or you just lack competence. I assume both.
Also take a look at this:
You say that a majority of maps are in enclosed areas such as cities and complexes, meaning that infantry have lots of cover and can easily place a remote explosive onto the hull of an HAV.
Yet the only maps that actually fit your description are Iron Delta and Impact Ridge. Please refrain from lying about map design to make your argument(s) credible.
Please, wipe the windshield off of your tank and see things from a clear perspective. It usually helps.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2011
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 20:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nice try. But let's point all of the things wrong here.
1. The Pilot literally drove straight into the person using AV.
2. The Pilot didn't turn on it's hardners when under fire (2nd time).
3. By the time the pilot did turn on it's hardners, his shields were down, meaning no resistance granted by hardners.
4. If the infantry actually knew how to aim, the person using AV would have died instantly.
5. The pilot who was evading waited to activate his NOS.
All of this wouldn't happen if someone with an IQ greater than 10 piloted that vehicle.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2177
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 02:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:-snip-thanks for posting the prime example of bad tank driving, I bet the next thing he did was to go to the forum and claim how bad tanks are
Sadly, that;s what most pilots did.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
|
|
| |
|