|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
855
   |
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:It seems yet again vehicle pilots have to tell infantry how to destroy a tank
all credibility lost in the first few words. congratulations. you are, just another average tank driver that is biased and stuck in his tunnelvision dreamworld.
additionally your memory seems to be really bad, it were the tank drivers whining all around how their tanks are not able to solo entire squads like an average CoD kid  math and vids of matches shown months ago that a tank can survive a single proto swarm for 20 seconds, some people in dust uni can but those allmighty self-appointed pros could not, the irony.
there were obvious problems, like roof forges due to map design, too fast scaling AV weaponry and core mechanics but none of them were really fixed, all the problems were now shifted to tanks itself. you do not need to have a magic crystal ball to see what will happen now, CCP will realise the mistake, swing the nerfhammer really hard and you will be begging to get 1.6 back.
final notes:
my tank is now cheaper than a full proto suit fit but is practically invincible to infantry and takes alot of effort to take down and I dont even use the bugged militia nitro, I am plenty fast without it. the only counter I have is other tanks. its like playing rock paper scissor with the difference that rocks only die to other rocks. I know what I will be picking only rocks now. |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
862
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: try it in PC
another proof of lack of credibility.
PC aka photoslideshow 514, is definately the answer to everything |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
862
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:get smart like the tankers did.
like whining nonstop despite the fact that tanks could already shrug of proto swarms for 20 seconds when properly fit?
|
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
866
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote: try it in PC another proof of lack of credibility. PC aka photoslideshow 514, is definately the answer to everything When PC works it works 2 organized teams with proto everything going at each other, you soon see what comes to be FOTM and what is broken Then again you are D- UNI and are still training so i dont expect you to leave pub matches with broken matchmaking
wow what a well thought out argument "when it works it works" who would guess that it works when it works.
also you have no clue about dust uni, it does not only contain new players that are "training". I am here since the start of closed beta, I simply do not bother with all the broken stuff and only play for fun except that tanks spoil all the fun now
driving tanks is like playing CoD, you blitz around and kill stuff left and right. the only thing that is now missing is a dog launcher. |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
867
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Atiim wrote:chase rowland wrote:get smart like the tankers did. adapt or die like the tankers did. now you know how it was for tankers.
also, I love how its always the same people complaining about tanks, makes it seem like theres more of them. So tell me again. Why should. I use AV for AV when an HAV does the job better again? How do you destroy a vehicle that you can't damage without it escaping. (Even without the lolnitous vehicles move too fast for AV). Also, the hardner on shielded vehicle needs to be away brighter. The white color causes the aura to blend in to the point where you have to stare directly at the vehicle to see if it's hardners are on. AV is still good, you have to use it to its advantages now and not just spam it Also if you cant tell if hardeners are on then you need your eyes tested I could say the same about the people QQing about the llolrendering glitch on Swarm Launchers. It's ironic how these same people are the ones saying to calm down about the lolnitous bug. (Which doesn't matter because even without the MLT NOS bug vehicles still move way too fast. You still haven't answered the question, so I'll do it for you. Currently, there is no good reason that anyone can supply me as to why I should use my AV instead of my HAV. A Sica/Soma has the capacity of 2 PRO AV. That's a problem. And lol the aura around hardnened shielded vehicles barely renders past 15m. Even SLs rendered past 15m.
not to mention a tank is cheaper than the proto AV suit required to even bother a tank.
|
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
872
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Wrong
500k is not cheaper than 200k
how often do you want to point out that you have zero credibility... you do need not the best tank with proto mods to kill other tanks, you point is again null and void. |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
877
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:to 2) So we agree the PLC is UP and not very viable as AV weapon ^^
to 6) Its easy 1 person should be able to fight of 1 tank as long as 1 person is enough to have a tank fully operable and the teamsize is fixed. I admit AV was on the upper hand in 1.6 but not nearly as far as many tanker said. I had quite some challanging duels but I had easy kills as well. So in genral I am not against the rebalance its just the coin flipped from one side to the other and both is bad for the game.
to 8) To have options is a good thing relieing on them a bad.
to 9) I think the range nerf is ok and deserved but the damage nerf was a bit too much overall.
I think most points are up to CCP as it is their game we can only provide feedback based on experience and personal opinions. 1 person can fight off my tank, its been done already to me this build, its the bad AV players who consistantly hit me
because you are a scrub with zero credibility as you have already nicely pointed out by yourself with your comments.
no point in arguing with such a biased tunnelvision scrub. you can reply the same nonsense over and over like you did, it wont change anything. the nerf will come and I will collect your tears afterwards |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
877
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:to 2) So we agree the PLC is UP and not very viable as AV weapon ^^
to 6) Its easy 1 person should be able to fight of 1 tank as long as 1 person is enough to have a tank fully operable and the teamsize is fixed. I admit AV was on the upper hand in 1.6 but not nearly as far as many tanker said. I had quite some challanging duels but I had easy kills as well. So in genral I am not against the rebalance its just the coin flipped from one side to the other and both is bad for the game.
to 8) To have options is a good thing relieing on them a bad.
to 9) I think the range nerf is ok and deserved but the damage nerf was a bit too much overall.
I think most points are up to CCP as it is their game we can only provide feedback based on experience and personal opinions. 1 person can fight off my tank, its been done already to me this build, its the bad AV players who consistantly hit me because you are a scrub with zero credibility as you have already nicely pointed out by yourself with your comments. no point in arguing with such a biased tunnelvision scrub. How does he have zero credibility?
he has zero credibility just like you. everyone can check it for free, all you have to do is to read the biased tunnelvision nonsense posted by your in the last 2 hours.
you can all dodge the arguments and repeat nonsense over and over again but as said, intelligence is OP, no one with a brain listens to it. |
|
|
| |
|