DUST Search - I'm a Runway Model now

All Channels

General Discussions

I'm a Runway Model now

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1707	Posted - 2013.12.12 03:33:00 - [1] - Quote HyperionsThunder wrote: Um, I'm sorry, but science proves that women walk exactly like that: http://www.biomotionlab.ca/Demos/BMLwalker.html Agreed, larger hips plus add in the fact female mercs are well toned. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1709	Posted - 2013.12.12 04:36:00 - [2] - Quote Garrett Blacknova wrote: I've posted a sensible comment earlier in the thread with my thoughts on the topic. But now, i feel like something less serious. If you take sexism seriously, do NOT read on. I don't take ME seriously, let alone anything else... Tell me more about how sexist this game is... Lol. People chuck that word around too freely even though there are clear differences based on hormones and how they affect our psyche, physique and capabilities in certain areas. Neither is better than each other, males and females do excel at different things. A very good and simple example is sport, would you think it fair to mix up sport so males and females compete side by side? Try watching the females football world cup ( soccer) and tell me they are as good as men, they have the same intense training. Sexist? Certainly not, its reality. Now to say that my gf belongs in the kitchen, should clean up and forever cook my dinner, that's sexist. To be sexist is to discriminate based on sex, observations are fine. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1709	Posted - 2013.12.12 04:46:00 - [3] - Quote Marlin Kirby wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: To be sexist is to discriminate based on sex, observations are fine. Hehe Old scientists use to believe that educated women were more likely to become sterile. It is observed science after all, right? A lot of the older stuff had ulterior motives rather than seeking the truth, by old logic people are either born smart or dumb. Apply lobotomies where needed Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1711	Posted - 2013.12.12 05:13:00 - [4] - Quote Marlin Kirby wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Marlin Kirby wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: To be sexist is to discriminate based on sex, observations are fine. Hehe Old scientists use to believe that educated women were more likely to become sterile. It is observed science after all, right? A lot of the older stuff had ulterior motives rather than seeking the truth, by old logic people are either born smart or dumb. Apply lobotomies where needed After all, it was proofed that Native Americans, Blacks, Pacific Islanders, Irish, Catholics, Southern Europeans, Eastern Europeans, Jews, and Asians are inferior to the Anglo Saxon master race, right? Lmao Sociologists back in the day had some pretty outrageous beliefs. I mean, look at this old chart that was shown to me last year: http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/tanehisicoates/Scientific_racism_irish.jpg Lol, madness They unknowingly or knowingly seek to divide rather than unify, they seek to tear everything apart! The universe is one, and everything is part of everything, knowledge through unity, not division. "When the doors of perception are finally cleansed, everything shall appear as it truly is, immaculate" Jim Morrison, musician and waste man. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1715	Posted - 2013.12.12 10:46:00 - [5] - Quote Garrett Blacknova wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: A very good and simple example is sport, would you think it fair to mix up sport so males and females compete side by side? Try watching the females football world cup ( soccer) and tell me they are as good as men, they have the same intense training. Sexist? Certainly not, its reality. So what you're saying is that, BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF TRAINING, female sports teams don't perform on the level of male teams? And that somehow proves... what, exactly? Women's sports, particularly the women's teams in traditionally male-oriented sports, are under-funded. As such, the sportswomen involved can't live as sporting professionals without a second job. Because of that lack of freedom to live a permanent training regimen like the men experience, they are often less skilled and less physically fit. Ever watched a men's Netball game? The difference looking from men's netball to women's is similar to your example, though not as extreme. There's a tendency for male netball players to perform on a less competitive level from the female players, because the male side of that sport isn't funded as well, isn't as popular, and doesn't attract as many highly-skilled athletes of that gender. Why? Because we still have long-running stereotypes associating some sports with men, and others with women. If you put two teams into a competitive sport, regardless of gender, the better-trained team will ALWAYS have the advantage. A men's Netball team usually loses to women because the men don't have as strict training, or as much experience as the women. A men's soccer team usually wins against women because they have the better training and more experience with the sport than the women. Neither of those observable facts proves that either gender is naturally better at sports, and claiming so is sexism through ignorance. A typical female body is smaller than a male. Women are, as a general rule, faster and more flexible than EQUALLY FIT males, but the man will have a greater amount of direct strength, and a lower centre of gravity, which gives an advantage in many scenarios. For most team sports, a mixed male AND female team would actually be ideal, because there are certain roles in most team sports which suit each gender. Lol no, you just farted out that. You can deny reality all you want son, I can't stand your ilk so welcome to another edition of posts hidden. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1715	Posted - 2013.12.12 10:47:00 - [6] - Quote The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: The Furtive Pygmy wrote: For those delusional social justice warriors who think women can compete at the level a man can, here's a fun little story about the two most dominant female athletes ever facing off against a man "During the 1998 Australian Open, sisters Serena and Venus Williams boasted that they could beat any man ranked outside the world's top 200. The challenge was accepted by Karsten Braasch, a German player ranked No 203 (his highest ranking was No 38). Before the matches, Braasch played a round of golf in the morning, drank a couple of beers, smoked a few cigarettes, and then played the Williams sisters for a set each, one after the other. He defeated Serena, 6-1, and Venus, 6-2. Serena said afterwards "I didn't know it would be that hard. I hit shots that would have been winners on the women's tour and he got to them easily." Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun" Nice try, tumblr kiddies. Using an example of a sport where balance (men have the advantage due to typically lower centre of gravity) and strength (men have the advantage here too) is a nice try. Even better when a large part of the argument against male dominance had been focused more on team sports and you deliberately chose an individual sport to "counter" the claims. Nice try, yourself. LMAO name one sport where balance and strength doesn't matter? Football? wrong Baseball? wrong Basketball? wrong Soccer? wrong Hockey? wrong Balance and strength are integral parts of every single sport in existence, nice try social justice kiddo A female goalie once tried to make the NHL leafs' squad. She was given one pre-season game and was so bad she never got another. Good game, was easy. He's just another hippy type that denies reality it seems, posts hidden helps to eliminate that carebear trumps reality nonsense. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1715	Posted - 2013.12.12 10:50:00 - [7] - Quote The Furtive Pygmy wrote: For those delusional social justice warriors who think women can compete at the level a man can, here's a fun little story about the two most dominant female athletes ever facing off against a man "During the 1998 Australian Open, sisters Serena and Venus Williams boasted that they could beat any man ranked outside the world's top 200. The challenge was accepted by Karsten Braasch, a German player ranked No 203 (his highest ranking was No 38). Before the matches, Braasch played a round of golf in the morning, drank a couple of beers, smoked a few cigarettes, and then played the Williams sisters for a set each, one after the other. He defeated Serena, 6-1, and Venus, 6-2. Serena said afterwards "I didn't know it would be that hard. I hit shots that would have been winners on the women's tour and he got to them easily." Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun" Nice try, tumblr kiddies. Precisely thank you, its a shame that you even had to give an example but bravo, reality 1 care bears -3 Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1715	Posted - 2013.12.12 10:53:00 - [8] - Quote Garret blacknova - thinks real proven observations are sexist. You represent the idiocy of today with hits such as "calling someone black is racist" and "its not fair blind people can't box" Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1715	Posted - 2013.12.12 11:10:00 - [9] - Quote The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: The Furtive Pygmy wrote: For those delusional social justice warriors who think women can compete at the level a man can, here's a fun little story about the two most dominant female athletes ever facing off against a man "During the 1998 Australian Open, sisters Serena and Venus Williams boasted that they could beat any man ranked outside the world's top 200. The challenge was accepted by Karsten Braasch, a German player ranked No 203 (his highest ranking was No 38). Before the matches, Braasch played a round of golf in the morning, drank a couple of beers, smoked a few cigarettes, and then played the Williams sisters for a set each, one after the other. He defeated Serena, 6-1, and Venus, 6-2. Serena said afterwards "I didn't know it would be that hard. I hit shots that would have been winners on the women's tour and he got to them easily." Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun" Nice try, tumblr kiddies. Using an example of a sport where balance (men have the advantage due to typically lower centre of gravity) and strength (men have the advantage here too) is a nice try. Even better when a large part of the argument against male dominance had been focused more on team sports and you deliberately chose an individual sport to "counter" the claims. Nice try, yourself. LMAO name one sport where balance and strength doesn't matter? Football? wrong Baseball? wrong Basketball? wrong Soccer? wrong Hockey? wrong Balance and strength are integral parts of every single sport in existence, nice try social justice kiddo A female goalie once tried to make the NHL leafs' squad. She was given one pre-season game and was so bad she never got another. Good game, was easy. It's funny as well because I used sports as a SIMPLE and reasonable example, his whole THEORY (trash/denial/ignorance) is based off of that and even that alone can't be argued with. He just picked one piece of a post among a few and attacked the most undeniable part. Very amusing. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1719	Posted - 2013.12.12 16:48:00 - [10] - Quote Jungian wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2013/dec/04/male-female-brains-real-differences Finally some science to back up what most people know. That's just pure trash from a paper. The differences hormones play on our psyche and physique are undeniable, its what makes us male and female. Are you a hippy carebear? Theres nothing sexist about differences in male and females, discrimination over sex is sexist lol and there is none of that here. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.

TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1719	Posted - 2013.12.12 17:00:00 - [11] - Quote Ccp keep the a$$ and hips shake of female avatars, if you remove that then you may as well make the male models short and shrimpy right? Because heaven forbid they walk like men, that would just be sexist. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1719	Posted - 2013.12.12 17:04:00 - [12] - Quote In fact let's be real carebears about it. We could give the males the female walk and the females the male walk, wouldn't that just totally be hippy politically correct Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1730	Posted - 2013.12.13 03:03:00 - [13] - Quote Jungian wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: That's just pure trash from a paper. Level 1 forum warrior, indeed. You are level 0, 1000 likes per level newb lol. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1730	Posted - 2013.12.13 03:46:00 - [14] - Quote Jungian wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Jungian wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: That's just pure trash from a paper. Level 1 forum warrior, indeed. You are level 0, 1000 likes per level newb lol. Which means I actually play the game And so do I, your still a forum warrior newb Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1730	Posted - 2013.12.13 03:48:00 - [15] - Quote I'm glad to be neither. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1732	Posted - 2013.12.13 04:11:00 - [16] - Quote DeadlyAztec11 wrote: IgniteableAura wrote: Give them a choice? Why not let those who want to flaunt, flaunt? We do need more choices in this game. I don't like the way my guy walks, looks like he is trying way to hard to look tough in his upper body while at the same time standing awkwardly relaxed in his lower body. Also some of the animations look as if he had his stiffy go on one side of his pants leg and he is trying to fix it in the most casual way possible... Every minute. Nah he walks like that because his skin tight suit and when you build muscle it does accentuate the way you walk. After iv worked out and my arms, chest and back are tight as fk I walk like that, it can't be helped but our mercs are in skin tight suits so they are like that constantly. Iv seriously over done it before and I was walking like I thought I was the ultimate bad ass but it was just that my muscles were tight as **** and basically stuck rigid and hurt like absolute fk to try and stretch which is basically impossible at that point. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1742	Posted - 2013.12.13 15:36:00 - [17] - Quote Jadd Hatchen wrote: Jungian wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Jungian wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: That's just pure trash from a paper. Level 1 forum warrior, indeed. You are level 0, 1000 likes per level newb lol. Which means I actually play the game Ok, since we are talking about figments that don't matter to this game or these forums... I have to say that you are both wrong. Assuming the following: If you play Assault, then you are a fighter If you play Logi, then you are a priest If you play a Scout, then you are a rogue If you play a Heavy/Commando, then you are a paladin/ranger If you play an EVE Pilot, then you area wizard Using those definitions, then you need the following for each level: FIGHTER ======= Level / Exp 1 / 0 2 / 2,000 3 / 4,000 4 / 8,000 5 / 16,000 6 / 32,000 7 / 64,000 8 / 125,000 9 / 250,000 10 / 500,000 PRIEST ====== Level / Exp 1 / 0 2 / 1,500 3 / 3,000 4 / 6,000 5 / 13,000 6 / 27,500 7 / 55,000 8 / 110,000 9 / 225,000 10 / 450,000 ROGUE ====== Level / Exp 1 / 0 2 / 1,250 3 / 2,500 4 / 5,000 5 / 10,000 6 / 20,000 7 / 40,000 8 / 70,000 9 / 110,000 10 / 160,000 PALADIN/RANGER =============== Level / Exp 1 / 0 2 / 2,250 3 / 4,500 4 / 9,000 5 / 18,000 6 / 36,000 7 / 75,000 8 / 150,000 9 / 300,000 10 / 600,000 WIZARD ====== Level / Exp 1 / 0 2 / 2,500 3 / 5,000 4 / 10,000 5 / 20,000 6 / 40,000 7 / 60,000 8 / 90,000 9 / 135,000 10 / 250,000 I believe these are the actual tables that you guys are looking for and this is an accurate translation as Paladins do wear the most armor like heavys do and Ranger wield two swords like commandos do. Not to mention that logi's revive and heal like Priests do, while Rogues are just plain nuisances like the scouts are. TL;DR - Take your D&D asses out of here you stupid kids! If I'm a kid you'd need to be wielding a zimmer frame mate, take your lies somewhere else, on these forums every thousand likes is a level up. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1744	Posted - 2013.12.13 15:43:00 - [18] - Quote Michael Epic wrote: lol....I hate to disagree with you OP, but women mostly walk that way. Not all of them of course but its subconsciously embedded into your brain my mainstream media and pop culture that you are supposed to be THIN THIN THIN and SEXY SEXY SEXY lol I don't know you...never met you, but if you have any type of nice body from thin as a rail to pleasantly plump an you're even a little bit pretty...I bet you walk and sway your hips. Some people just do that naturally and some do it and don't realize it lol My girlfriend does it....she swings her hips like a stripper when she walks. She has no idea and I know she doesn't do it on purpose but the sway back and forth is unmistakable haha I'd say making the female characters walk with a sway is more believable then having them walk rigid and butch like the male characters do. Especially with anything skin tight and our mercs wear skin tight suits. Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 1744	Posted - 2013.12.13 15:59:00 - [19] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: I am making a post in the feed back section gentlemen, asking for the walk not to be taken off. I say good day to you all!! (slams door) (Opens door and slings chunks of sht at surt) God damn you! (Shuts door, doesn't wash hands, eats banana) Level 1 forum warrior. Minmatar and Gallente fw. I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.