| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Drifter MAGGOT
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
121
   |
Posted - 2013.12.11 18:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Aren't tanks suppose to be fast? |
Smooth Assassin
Stardust incorporation
435
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 18:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
No, they're meant to be slow but hard hitting, like heavies and i just realized that a tank is officially now better than a heavy.
Assassination is my thing.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1841
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 18:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
AV is also supposed to be a threat to vehicles.
And no, they aren't supposed to be that fast.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Drifter MAGGOT
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
121
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 18:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
But tanks nowadays are fast. |
Drifter MAGGOT
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
121
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:AV is also supposed to be a threat to vehicles.
And no, they aren't supposed to be that fast.
If tanks were easy to be taken out they wouldn't be "tanks". |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
4126
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Drifter MAGGOT wrote:But tanks nowadays are fast.
And Humvees are faster.
In DUST, not so much. That's the problem. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1841
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Drifter MAGGOT wrote:But tanks nowadays are fast.
And a javelin nowadays can OHK most vehicles.
Let's not go there.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Drifter MAGGOT
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
121
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Drifter MAGGOT wrote:But tanks nowadays are fast. And a javelin nowadays can OHK most vehicles. Let's not go there.
I agree with this as well, but I don't want tanks to be slowed down. |
Justin Tymes
Dem Durrty Boyz
Renegade Alliance
538
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Drifter MAGGOT wrote:Atiim wrote:AV is also supposed to be a threat to vehicles.
And no, they aren't supposed to be that fast. If tanks were easy to be taken out they wouldn't be "tanks".
Not just tanks. Lolswarms are useless against EVERYTHING. Even Installations will take forever to get rid of with swarms, and requires you to get well into their optimal to use.
AV Nades are good for LAVs and that's about it.
Forge Guns can't even tag tanks moving like LAVs from one side or the map to the other.
REs are the best way to kill tanks, as I predicted, although I didn't predict Kamikaze LAVs to make a comeback. |
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
4776
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
Smooth Assassin wrote:No, they're meant to be slow but hard hitting, like heavies and i just realized that a tank is officially now better than a heavy.
Since when are modern tanks slow?
"Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL
|
|
|
Vitharr Foebane
Blood Money Mercenaries
334
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
I think its about time to bring back WP for damaging vehicles otherwise AV is going to be very high risk / NO REWARD
TBA IS NOT A NAME!
At least give the heavy laser a name so we know you MIGHT be working on it.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1841
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Drifter MAGGOT wrote:Atiim wrote:Drifter MAGGOT wrote:But tanks nowadays are fast. And a javelin nowadays can OHK most vehicles. Let's not go there. I agree with this as well, but I don't want tanks to be slowed down.
Then request two variants.
One variant is a fast moving, highly mobile vehicle that is based on speed tanking and high DPS, but relies on low resistances and has a lower HP ceiling as a compromise.
Another variant is slow moving with a slower tracking speed that has higher resistances and a higher HP ceiling; but lower DPS as a comprimise.
In my eyes, this is what the Gunnlogi and Madrugars should be.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1841
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Drifter MAGGOT wrote:Atiim wrote:Drifter MAGGOT wrote:But tanks nowadays are fast. And a javelin nowadays can OHK most vehicles. Let's not go there. I agree with this as well, but I don't want tanks to be slowed down.
Their current speed is broken though.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
242
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:I think its about time to bring back WP for damaging vehicles otherwise AV is going to be very high risk / NO REWARD
Just damaging tanks so they can only kill your infantry half of the match instead of the whole match doesn't feel very rewarding.
CCP apparently did not understand tankers QQ
Pick one of two
Tanks are expensive but hard to destroy
Tanks are in expensive and easy to destroy
Previously
Tanks are expensive and of varying difficulty
Now
Tanks are cheap compared to old tanks, impossible to destroy
Why even bother with AV ATM, if you don't use remote explosives you aren't going to get anywhere. |
Vitharr Foebane
Blood Money Mercenaries
336
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 19:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Slag Emberforge wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:I think its about time to bring back WP for damaging vehicles otherwise AV is going to be very high risk / NO REWARD Just damaging tanks so they can only kill your infantry half of the match instead of the whole match doesn't feel very rewarding. CCP apparently did not understand tankers QQ Pick one of two Tanks are expensive but hard to destroy Tanks are in expensive and easy to destroy Previously Tanks are expensive and of varying difficulty Now Tanks are cheap compared to old tanks, impossible to destroy Why even bother with AV ATM, if you don't use remote explosives you aren't going to get anywhere.
Because I'm a heavy and it kills me to use light weapons i'd like to get SOME use out of my SP investment. Then again just making the HMG semi scary again or releasing a heavy laser and allowing heavies to be good at something would be nice
TBA IS NOT A NAME!
At least give the heavy laser a name so we know you MIGHT be working on it.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |