|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
528
   |
Posted - 2013.12.07 06:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
calvin b wrote:I have tried and still cannot come up with a proper build without sacrificing something. We all know this and we know what the problem is, we need more POWER. All assault players need at least this much more
Basic 25 CPU 10 PG
Advance 75 CPU 50PG
Proto 100 CPU 75 PG
If an assault is going to be self efficient, we need the extra power to fit hives, scanners, and not have to sacrifice our weapon or our survivability. If you say add a CPU or PG module then WTF, I only have so many slots.
If you agree please post and if you do not please give a good counter statement.
Your numbers are way off. Aside from being to much, CPU/PG distributive value is roughly 5/1. You're way off.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
528
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 06:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
calvin b wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:calvin b wrote:I have tried and still cannot come up with a proper build without sacrificing something. We all know this and we know what the problem is, we need more POWER. All assault players need at least this much more
Basic 25 CPU 10 PG
Advance 75 CPU 50PG
Proto 100 CPU 75 PG
If an assault is going to be self efficient, we need the extra power to fit hives, scanners, and not have to sacrifice our weapon or our survivability. If you say add a CPU or PG module then WTF, I only have so many slots.
If you agree please post and if you do not please give a good counter statement. Your numbers are way off. Aside from being to much, CPU/PG distributive value is roughly 5/1. You're way off. Ok what do you recommend?
Hold on need to think/calculat, it's delicate.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
528
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 06:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:calvin b wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:calvin b wrote:I have tried and still cannot come up with a proper build without sacrificing something. We all know this and we know what the problem is, we need more POWER. All assault players need at least this much more
Basic 25 CPU 10 PG
Advance 75 CPU 50PG
Proto 100 CPU 75 PG
If an assault is going to be self efficient, we need the extra power to fit hives, scanners, and not have to sacrifice our weapon or our survivability. If you say add a CPU or PG module then WTF, I only have so many slots.
If you agree please post and if you do not please give a good counter statement. Your numbers are way off. Aside from being to much, CPU/PG distributive value is roughly 5/1. You're way off. Ok what do you recommend? Hold on need to think/calculat, it's delicate.
CPU/PG
Proto 60/13
Adv 42/9
Std 30/6
That sound about right.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
528
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 07:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
calvin b wrote:Ok I can go with that, are you willing to negotiate and add 10 more to CPU and 7PG for the proto. That to me would make me happy.
These numbers were calculated with a lot of weapons and modules in mind, to make it to where certain sacrifices still need to be made. I would go no higher than 10 more CPU and 2 more PG.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
528
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 07:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Also, a thing you may not be considering is, these values were calculated to be an increase to dropsuit base CPU/PG, which doesn't include the 1.25 bonus from engineering and electronics skills.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
530
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 10:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
calvin b wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:calvin b wrote:Ok I can go with that, are you willing to negotiate and add 10 more to CPU and 7PG for the proto. That to me would make me happy.
These numbers were calculated with a lot of weapons and modules in mind, to make it to where certain sacrifices still need to be made. I would go no higher than 10 more CPU and 2 more PG. Ok I can live with that, but can the rest of the community agree. I am open for compromise, as long as it resolves the issue I can care less how we got there.
Change the values in the OP then.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
|
|
| |
|