| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
David Spd
Caldari State
110
   |
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:23:00 -
[61] - Quote
nor asha wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rather get rid of STD - ADV - PRO dropsuit concepts instead. Removing it would be the worst thing to happen on Dust, this game needs variety and the tanks certainly do not have much. No the point is to introduce more variety by removing the old flawed system. The dropsuits should of been following the same pattern... Look at Eve online, Copy that.
EVE and Dust are two different games for two different demographs. We REALLY don't need two EVE online games and if you want to play a game like EVE Online then please... go play EVE Online.
Just because something works on EVE doesn't mean it will work for Dust and I think most of the problems surrounding this gamecame from CCP trying too hard to translate everything from a space sim into a first person shooter.
--> I'm a closed beta vet; I just don't post often <--
"Other people just complicate my life." ~Solid Snake
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1455
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:
hey, your the one with the 1st crazy post that everyone is replying too. reap what you sewed
Atiim wrote:A tanker says "Lets get rid of AV and nobody bats an eye"
Atiim says "Well then get rid of vehicles" and everybody losses their f***ing minds.
If you don't have Anti-Vehicle weaponry , you shouldn't have vehicles to begin with
And vice versa, if you don't have vehicles, you shouldn't have Anti-Vehicle weaponry.
That's like having a heavy without a scout. Or having scouts without active scanners
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:24:00 -
[63] - Quote
David Spd wrote:nor asha wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rather get rid of STD - ADV - PRO dropsuit concepts instead. Removing it would be the worst thing to happen on Dust, this game needs variety and the tanks certainly do not have much. No the point is to introduce more variety by removing the old flawed system. The dropsuits should of been following the same pattern... Look at Eve online, Copy that. EVE and Dust are two different games for two different demographs. We REALLY don't need two EVE online games and if you want to play a game like EVE Online then please... go play EVE Online. Just because something works on EVE doesn't mean it will work for Dust and I think most of the problems surrounding this gamecame from CCP trying too hard to translate everything from a space sim into a first person shooter.
still better than cod
Void Echo's Alt
Back-up Profile
Back on main 12-20-2013
|
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution
1833
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
nor asha wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rather get rid of STD - ADV - PRO dropsuit concepts instead. : O Btw this is crazy space, Seeing us agree so strongly on something makes me really happy :D the 1st level of logi should unlock the proto logi, but you'd only get 1 level of the bonus per level so you'd want to level it up. Just like tanks in dust and everything in eve online.
Terrible idea.
Absolutely
terrible.
And I don't like IWS's idea very much either.
When I'm depressed, I cut myself......A BIG SLICE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1464
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 17:50:00 -
[65] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:All it takes is to give the other tiers a new paint job, increase slot count + more CPU/PG, and handle some things server side. From here the specialization roles would then have it's own tiers like the dropsuit does so why is there no hint of what will the future updates offer for vehicles. All I know is that they'll bring in the pilot suit and return some vehicles back but is that it? Aside from Assault Dropships and Hardeners, there wasn't other GOOD content update for vehicles in a whole year. It will never happen, because infantry won't allow it. While I'm not strictly infantry, I would actually welcome the addition of ADV and PRO HAVs with open arms. However, if CCP does ever decide to implement ADV and PRO HAVs, they would need to buff the Swarm Launcher from where it will be in Uprising 1.7 then STD vehicles will be ****** again and pro hav's would be as usefull as std vehicles in 1.7
STD gear should be $#!tty when faced against PRO AV. That's why I think we should introduce ADV and PRO AV.
What afraid of a bit of challange? Worried that if they were rebalanced for ADV and PRO tanks, you wouldn't be able to stomp and go 32-0?
If PRO AV can't even destroy STD tanks, then what good would it do against ADV and PRO tanks. With that ideal, we'd be better off not introducing ADV and PRO tanks.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |