|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
403
   |
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
the only thing that should be able to take out a tank is... ANOTHER TANK
do you agree?
personally i agree.. i think tanks should be a dominating presence on the battlefield as is such the case in real life.
air strikes from fast air seem to be the only counter.. iv seen CHALLENGER 2 battle tanks shrug off rpg-7s and anti tank mines.
level 0 forum warrior
self-proclaimed slayer
weapon of choice:
GEK-38 gallante assault rifle
-STB infantry
|
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
404
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:yeah right thats why landmines, RPG's and IED's can destroy or badly damage any kind of vehicle. You just wait till i dig a hole and put 60 remote explosives inside of it. Then i wait for you to drive over it and boom a big ass explosion.
not tanks.. that have class 5 choban armour mesh... something the americans have been trying to get there hands on for years now but the british military will never release such documents
level 0 forum warrior
self-proclaimed slayer
weapon of choice:
GEK-38 gallante assault rifle
-STB infantry
|
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
404
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:SILVERBACK 02 wrote:the only thing that should be able to take out a tank is... ANOTHER TANK
do you agree?
personally i agree.. i think tanks should be a dominating presence on the battlefield as is such the case in real life.
air strikes from fast air seem to be the only counter.. iv seen CHALLENGER 2 battle tanks shrug off rpg-7s and anti tank mines. This is not real life. What matters is balance. If only tanks could take out tanks, the team with the best fitted pilot would win, provided a whole enemy squad didn't call out cheaper tanks and swarm them all at once. It would escalate stomping even further than it is now. It's hard enough to blow a HAV with low level AV, but with no AV? What, you expect all the blueberries to invest millions of SP into tanks to take out enemy tanks? No, the dedicated tanker would have the best tank and stomp all the militia tanks being thrown at him until someone with a better fitted tank squashed him. It'd become Tank 514. Everyone would need to invest into tanks just to not get stomped.
BOOOM! there you go i was waiting for someone to say this^^
so what do you think infantry players do?? the best fit logi slayer seems to have the best kdr at the end of the match no matter how many miltia suit blueberrys are thrown at it...
BALANCE IS THERE.
level 0 forum warrior
self-proclaimed slayer
weapon of choice:
GEK-38 gallante assault rifle
-STB infantry
|
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
404
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:SILVERBACK 02 wrote:The dark cloud wrote:yeah right thats why landmines, RPG's and IED's can destroy or badly damage any kind of vehicle. You just wait till i dig a hole and put 60 remote explosives inside of it. Then i wait for you to drive over it and boom a big ass explosion. not tanks.. that have class 5 choban armour mesh... something the americans have been trying to get there hands on for years now but the british military will never release such documents HEY ... HEY ...HEY ... the British have been trying to get the secret sauce of the BIG MAC  for years now but we gave it to the Scottish  , but will not share with the Brit's until they share . So there  .
scottish.... are british.
level 0 forum warrior
self-proclaimed slayer
weapon of choice:
GEK-38 gallante assault rifle
-STB infantry
|
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
409
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 22:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:No I don't agree
If the only way to take down a tank is with another tank
1) If you are only tanker in match god mode 4 u
2) If other team also has tanks, whoever has better tanks wins
3) Infantry only become good for capping points
4) entire rock paper scissors gameplay ruined
5) Infantry interaction with tanks devolves into hiding
6) World of tanks ensues
Tanks should be a force multiplier
1) 1 tank should not be more effective against infantry on its own, than 1 infantry player
2) 1 tank alone should not be the equivalent worth of more than 1 infantry player
3) Vehicle infantry co-operation should be the main point of a vehicle
4) a tanks role, is not to slaughter everyone and let the infantry clean up the mess
5) a tank guarantees nothing and will only improve chances of success when utilised with a supporting squad
are you an idiot!!???
so you want one 100k proto suit to be the same worth as a 2.3 mil isk tank?>>? you nooob go home
level 0 forum warrior
self-proclaimed slayer
weapon of choice:
GEK-38 gallante assault rifle
-STB infantry
|
|
|
| |
|