|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1841
   |
Posted - 2013.11.15 06:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
SCR is very deadly and definitely FOTM. Once AR gets off the stage, this will be realized. Since the majority doesn't talk about it, the remaining few don't mention it.
I believe the SCR overpowers AR in many ways. It can be a nuisance on the field. I shiver at Imperial SCR |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1841
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 06:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:I've been a SCR user since their release. They're the most balanced weapon in the game, so you can take your SCR is OP crap somewhere else and cry about it.
But you cry about ARs. The SCR is very OP. It's just not OP because...you use it and don't want it nerfed like what you and others' crusade did to the AR. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1841
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 06:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:News just in: ScR is Amarr technology.
It is SUPPOSED to outclass the AR in range.
The AScR is still not as good as the regular AR.
Except, it pretty much outclasses the AR in many ways. Now I'm not upset or complaining. I continue to use my AR. My old CEO tried to get me into SCRs. I've seen him run do some damage on the field. It just wasn't my style.
But SCR has range. Not only that, the damage and ROF is monstrous compared to AR. Some strafing and from the hip fire from a SCR (skilled one), you're dead in a nanosecond.
Again, I'm not mad or am I complaining. I'm just dealing with reality. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1841
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 06:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:News just in: ScR is Amarr technology.
It is SUPPOSED to outclass the AR in range.
The AScR is still not as good as the regular AR.
Except, it pretty much outclasses the AR in many ways. Now I'm not upset or complaining. I continue to use my AR. My old CEO tried to get me into SCRs. I've seen him do some damage on the field. For me, the rifle just wasn't my style. But SCR has range. Not only that, the damage and ROF is monstrous compared to AR. Some strafing and from the hip fire from a SCR (skilled one), you're dead in a nanosecond. Again, I'm not mad or am I complaining. I'm just dealing with reality. The time of the jack of all trades master of all AR will be past in 1.7.
You are uttering common rhetoric that many others say that really doesn't make any kind of sense.
The AR is the jack of all trades. That's what assault rifle is, essentially. It's built upon that foundation as the common all around weapon for the infantry soldier. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1842
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 07:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:News just in: ScR is Amarr technology.
It is SUPPOSED to outclass the AR in range.
The AScR is still not as good as the regular AR.
Except, it pretty much outclasses the AR in many ways. Now I'm not upset or complaining. I continue to use my AR. My old CEO tried to get me into SCRs. I've seen him do some damage on the field. For me, the rifle just wasn't my style. But SCR has range. Not only that, the damage and ROF is monstrous compared to AR. Some strafing and from the hip fire from a SCR (skilled one), you're dead in a nanosecond. Again, I'm not mad or am I complaining. I'm just dealing with reality. The time of the jack of all trades master of all AR will be past in 1.7. You are uttering common rhetoric that many others say that really doesn't make any kind of sense. The AR is the jack of all trades. That's what assault rifle is, essentially. It's built upon that foundation as the common all around weapon for the infantry soldier. The AR has had a weapon profile that was made to cover all types of weapons. This is why it has had a long range, high ROF and high damage. This is a well known fact. Now that CCP actually tunes the weapon profiles to be unique, people start crying. Which weapon do you believe will win in a 10m strafe battle with skilled players and equal tank, AR or ScR (tactical)? I know that the AR will win, and it should, since it will output sustained dps throughout the whole magazine. Youre stupid if you use ScR in CQC. Much better to switch to an SMG in that case.
yea it's stupid for CQC if you ADS. But most will hip fire at close range. The SCR is powerful weapon in the right hands. Again, this won't be fully realized until the changes come to AR and the majority switches over to SCR. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1842
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 07:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yes, the majority does fail miserably at handling that weapon. It's a problem with those who know what they are doing with it. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1842
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 08:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:DJINN Marauder wrote:More range is a given since it is amarr laser like technology.
The current AR is Gallente. If you think about it.. The AR has been the most OP weapon through out all the builds. It's range is insane for Gallente blaster technology. Honestly it's nice seeing more diversity on the field than just AR everywhere.
Now, I use the imperial and I will say, it is very OP in 1v1s. That is why you want to catch the scrambler guy in 1v2 situation. Also don't challenge a scrambler at range... That'll get you killed. Even if you use an AR
As far as the ASCR goes, I think it sucks compared to regular AR. It feels like it has less range and more dispersion and recoil than the ARs. :/ ^ This dude gets it Do not think that this game is about having equal weapons. Duvolle AR will shred u apart in close ranges, it is supposed to. Do not engage if you do not have the upper hand. Imperial ScR will shred you apart in med-long ranges. Do not engage if you do not have the upper hand. This is what makes Dust 514 the game it is. All weapons are better than others at specific tasks. It makes Dust 514 the thinking mans shooter IMO.
So I hope you remember that when its time for another AR is OP thread. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1842
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 08:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Protected Void wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:News just in: ScR is Amarr technology.
It is SUPPOSED to outclass the AR in range.
The AScR is still not as good as the regular AR.
Except, it pretty much outclasses the AR in many ways. Now I'm not upset or complaining. I continue to use my AR. My old CEO tried to get me into SCRs. I've seen him do some damage on the field. For me, the rifle just wasn't my style. But SCR has range. Not only that, the damage and ROF is monstrous compared to AR. Some strafing and from the hip fire from a SCR (skilled one), you're dead in a nanosecond. Again, I'm not mad or am I complaining. I'm just dealing with reality. The time of the jack of all trades master of all AR will be past in 1.7. You are uttering common rhetoric that many others say that really doesn't make any kind of sense. The AR is the jack of all trades. That's what assault rifle is, essentially. It's built upon that foundation as the common all around weapon for the infantry soldier. In the real world, yes. This is game, in which the various weapons and elements need to have some balance among them to preserve the fun. Anyway, the saying goes "Jack of all trades, master of none". Which means that added general utility will lower single-use case excellence.
I wonder, why are folks wasting time expressing things that we are fully aware of?? We don't get anywhere saying the sky is not actually blue. That it's freezing in space. That cats spit furballs. We already know that. It does nothing to contribute to the expanding of knowledge.
I know this is a video game. I know what jack of all trade means.
Let's add some constructive opinions instead of going for the all too common forum play of being captain obvious
|
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1842
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 09:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Michael Arck - White knighting the AR since 2013.
Yet my posts don't indicate a "white knight" thought process besides what you perceive as black and white. It's not that simple. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1843
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 11:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lea Silencio wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Yes, the majority does fail miserably at handling that weapon. It's a problem with those who know what they are doing with it. And that is a "problem" how exactly? A weapon that is difficult to use should reward player skill. Not my or anyone else's fault that we know how to aim. Your counter argument is completely invalid.
I don't know what the heck you're talking about. I wasn't saying its your fault that you know how to use the weapon. What I'm saying is the "OP talks" aren't prevalant because the majority doesn't aim well with it. For those who are good at using the weapon, it can be a major problem for those who face against it.
That wasn't a counter argument, that was a "matter of fact" statement. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|