DUST Search - Tacnet is Underpowered

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Tacnet is Underpowered

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Keri Starlight 0uter.Heaven Proficiency V. 1840	Posted - 2013.11.07 10:26:00 - [1] - Quote I read many threads about Active Scanners being OP, but then I just realized something: Active Scanners didn't change in 1.4, except for the fact that the people you scan is orange instead of red (and then WP for scanning were introduced, I don't know if you want to count this into). I've been a Scanner user since Uprising 1.1. The only reason why they are much more useful now is because our Tacnet has been made almost useless. Before 1.4, just few people used the Scanner because of the very high reliability of our Tacnet. So the point is: can't we find a decent balance between the Tacnet and Active Scanning? I feel like the problem is the Tacnet being UP rather than Scanners being OP. -Caldari Achura - One with the Universe -Tac AR Specialist "I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
shaman oga Nexus Balusa Horizon 889	Posted - 2013.11.07 10:39:00 - [2] - Quote Scanners should NOT: Display target direction Give margin of error message if scanning a dampened target Tacnet (on scanned enemies) should provide: Class info (heavy, medium, light frame) It would be fine for me "Just another piece of duct tape" Equality Event
Keri Starlight 0uter.Heaven Proficiency V. 1840	Posted - 2013.11.07 10:42:00 - [3] - Quote shaman oga wrote: Scanners should NOT: Give margin of error message if scanning a dampened target I really agree with this. It's very dumb that it does. -Caldari Achura - One with the Universe -Tac AR Specialist "I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
Vyzion Eyri The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 1860	Posted - 2013.11.07 11:33:00 - [4] - Quote shaman oga wrote: Scanners should NOT: Display target direction Give margin of error message if scanning a dampened target Tacnet (on scanned enemies) should provide: Class info (heavy, medium, light frame) It would be fine for me I'd like to see scanner variants which much less CPU/PG cost but only ping the position of enemies when scanned, basically a snapshot of the enemy forces. Also give it more scan precision for cheaper skill costs. Agree with margin of error notification having to go. We need modules which share TACNET vision. I'd love to run a precision enhancer and range amplifier logibro if I could share vision with the team. I'd be a walking scanner, basically. And can we get upgraded minimaps in vehicle first person mode? Maybe the scale should be larger, so we an idea of bigger picture. Combine this with an longer ranges on vehicle scanners, and we'll start seeing some interesting vehicle usage. "..things that some people frankly don't even get the chance to do in real life, because it's poorly designed." -Veigar
Garth Mandra The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 198	Posted - 2013.11.07 11:38:00 - [5] - Quote I want passive scans shared. Not the visual detection just the ~10m dropsuit scanning. That way scouts get a bit of a buff and fitting scan mods to any suit becomes a valid tactic instead of a waste of space. Active scanners need some work too.
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Kinsho Swords Caldari State 54	Posted - 2013.11.07 12:06:00 - [6] - Quote Keri Starlight wrote: I read many threads about Active Scanners being OP, but then I just realized something: Active Scanners didn't change in 1.4, except for the fact that the people you scan is orange instead of red (and then WP for scanning were introduced, I don't know if you want to count this into). I've been a Scanner user since Uprising 1.1. The only reason why they are much more useful now is because our Tacnet has been made almost useless. Before 1.4, just few people used the Scanner because of the very high reliability of our Tacnet. So the point is: can't we find a decent balance between the Tacnet and Active Scanning? I feel like the problem is the Tacnet being UP rather than Scanners being OP. I haven't been playing as long but I had a problem with the Tacnet as well and I though it was just me . I didn't want to say anything because I haven't been playing that long and I'm STILL learning the physics of the game . But thank you for this piece because now I know . No knock against the scanners because I like them and need to get specked in them . I just have the Aurum one that's offered to begin with . " Doubts are like flies and should be crushed !!!!!! " I hope that I am THE FLY SWATTER of those in my presence .
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Kinsho Swords Caldari State 54	Posted - 2013.11.07 12:10:00 - [7] - Quote Vyzion Eyri wrote: shaman oga wrote: Scanners should NOT: Display target direction Give margin of error message if scanning a dampened target Tacnet (on scanned enemies) should provide: Class info (heavy, medium, light frame) It would be fine for me I'd like to see scanner variants which much less CPU/PG cost but only ping the position of enemies when scanned, basically a snapshot of the enemy forces. Also give it more scan precision for cheaper skill costs. Agree with margin of error notification having to go. We need modules which share TACNET vision. I'd love to run a precision enhancer and range amplifier logibro if I could share vision with the team. I'd be a walking scanner, basically. And can we get upgraded minimaps in vehicle first person mode? Maybe the scale should be larger, so we an idea of bigger picture. Combine this with an longer ranges on vehicle scanners, and we'll start seeing some interesting vehicle usage. All good ideals , like usual coming from you Vyzion . " Doubts are like flies and should be crushed !!!!!! " I hope that I am THE FLY SWATTER of those in my presence .
Lightning Bolt2 From The Mist 318	Posted - 2013.11.07 16:08:00 - [8] - Quote Vyzion Eyri wrote: We need modules which share TACNET vision. I'd love to run a precision enhancer and range amplifier logibro if I could share vision with the team. I'd be a walking scanner, basically. we need a spotting system based off of scan precision. remember, when you first see lightning play in a open field! from the non-existent mist! forum warrior lvl: pathetic!
Doshneil Antaro Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 147	Posted - 2013.11.07 17:11:00 - [9] - Quote Garth Mandra wrote: I want passive scans shared. Not the visual detection just the ~10m dropsuit scanning. That way scouts get a bit of a buff and fitting scan mods to any suit becomes a valid tactic instead of a waste of space. Active scanners need some work too. I think that scouts only should have the shared passive scan. It would help them fulfill their role better, plus I would slap on wps for squad members killing passive scanned targets. Also, any enemy in a scouts cross hair's should show up for the squad as well. This would encourage people to play as scouts, as well as give them a defined use on the battlefield.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.