| Pages: 1 [2]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Avinash Decker
 Seykal Expeditionary Group
 Minmatar Republic
 
 85
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 18:46:00 -
          [31] - Quote 
 It is pretty dumb down from the ps4 version . I'm sure once the ps4 releases they will upgrade to it.
 
 And I'm sure that the Bf4 will offer some pretty intense , and competitive matches. ( Commentary can get annoying)
 | 
      
      
        |  Arkena Wyrnspire
 Turalyon 514
 Turalyon Alliance
 
 4585
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 19:19:00 -
          [32] - Quote 
 
 soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  
 Because clearly comparing a PS3 game to a PS4 game isn't unfair at all right?
 Oh wait.
 
 What the OP is saying is that Dust beats BF4 on graphics on PS3. Obviously not on the PS4, lol.
 
 Level 4 Forum Warrior Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution | 
      
      
        |  KryptixX
 Imperfects
 Negative-Feedback
 
 424
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 19:55:00 -
          [33] - Quote 
 
 Aeon Amadi wrote:KryptixX wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: Cut the graphics and Battlefield 3/4 is just some half-hearted FPS game with no real drive other than shooting the other guy in the face for arbitrary Skinner's Box style rewards. Game mode variety makes it much less monotonous than DUST atm, regardless of how many skills you can upgrade. PC and FW don't help all that much either. That's all well and good but at the end of the day no amount of game modes are going to give a player in Battlefield some sense of purpose - what's the point? Sure, Dust 514 is monotonous but it's the overarching scheme of things that matters. See my previous post =D META game is cool and all but if the game itself is stale I'd rather play something like BF4 and fly a plane around or play a gamemode like rush and enjoy the game itself, especially as a casual player.
 | 
      
      
        |  Krom Ganesh
 Holdfast Syndicate
 Amarr Empire
 
 553
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 20:32:00 -
          [34] - Quote 
 
 Aeon Amadi wrote:Unfortunately most of the stuff you listed are PC games!! You kinda have to guide Console gamers around on a leash for them to feel like they get the full experience, which is incredibly unfortunate. A lot of people that play Dust 514 always seem to say the same thing: "There's nothing to do, there's no drive."
 Which is contradictory to what the game itself offers - Eve Online, and subsequently Dust 514, don't give you any drive. You give yourself the drive. You're free to do whatever you want. Join a corporation and make a name for yourself, a reputation as it were. Fight for Faction Warfare and make a difference in the -huge- war that's going on.
 
 The only REAL issue with Dust 514 at the moment is that most of that stuff isn't as noticable as we'd like it to be, but they're already working on that xD
 
 The no drive has little to do with console gamers.
 
 It is a combination of three things
 
 First, this is a FPS with RPG elements which isn't common. One of the commonalities of RPGs is that they expect you to define who your character is. However, Dust 514 is an FPS mainly and thus will draw people who are interested in FPS games which normally provide other things to drive their players that Dust lacks.
 
 Second, as I said, other FPS games have something that Dust lacks. Immersion into the battlefield. When you play Battlefield 3, you hear explosions and gunfire in the distance, your ears "ring" when an explosion goes off near you, most actions are accompanied by characters saying something such as yelling "I need a medic" when requesting support or your enemies yelling when you shoot them. All of this combines to make you feel like you are in an actual battle and that is more than enough to drive players.
 
 Third, as you said, a lot of Dust's drive is hidden and abstract.
 | 
      
      
        |  BARDAS
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 753
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 20:33:00 -
          [35] - Quote 
 
 soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  
 This. I got BF4 on the PS3 and really didn't expect anything better looking than BF3. Personally, I am enjoying myself. Also, a big plus is the game actually works!!! OMG!!!
 | 
      
      
        |  Paran Tadec
 Ancient Exiles
 
 1577
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 20:40:00 -
          [36] - Quote 
 
 MPX Shad wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  So they made a bad looking game on purpose. Thats no excuse Bro. Next gen will always look better, but Im speaking on the here and now...PS3 
 Thread is irrelevant in 2 weeks.
 
 Bittervet Proficiency V thanks logibro! | 
      
      
        |  Aeon Amadi
 A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
 
 3623
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 23:35:00 -
          [37] - Quote 
 
 Krom Ganesh wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Unfortunately most of the stuff you listed are PC games!! You kinda have to guide Console gamers around on a leash for them to feel like they get the full experience, which is incredibly unfortunate. A lot of people that play Dust 514 always seem to say the same thing: "There's nothing to do, there's no drive."
 Which is contradictory to what the game itself offers - Eve Online, and subsequently Dust 514, don't give you any drive. You give yourself the drive. You're free to do whatever you want. Join a corporation and make a name for yourself, a reputation as it were. Fight for Faction Warfare and make a difference in the -huge- war that's going on.
 
 The only REAL issue with Dust 514 at the moment is that most of that stuff isn't as noticable as we'd like it to be, but they're already working on that xD
 The no drive has little to do with console gamers. It is a combination of three things First, this is a FPS with RPG elements which isn't common. One of the commonalities of RPGs is that they expect you to define who your character is. However, Dust 514 is an FPS mainly and thus will draw people who are interested in FPS games which normally provide other things to drive their players that Dust lacks. Second, as I said, other FPS games have something that Dust lacks. Immersion into the battlefield. Different FPS achieve this in different ways but the most applicable would probably be Battlefield due to Dust wanting to be of similar scale as BF battles. When you play Battlefield 3, you hear explosions and gunfire in the distance, your ears "ring" when an explosion goes off near you, most actions are accompanied by characters saying something such as yelling "I need a medic" when requesting support or your enemies yelling when you shoot them. All of this combines to make you feel like you are in an actual battle and that is more than enough to drive players. Third, as you said, a lot of Dust's drive is hidden and abstract. 
 Everything you mentioned in the second aspect can be utilized in a later expansion - CCP made it abundantly clear that they want the core game to work before going crazy with the new content. There's still a lot to go: Gas, lava, storm planets being a few awesome examples... MTACs, Fighters, Speeders... New weapons... Skyfire Battery... That's all in the future. It's not just a new map pack and releasing weaponry that wasn't done when the game released, this is constant free expansions and updates that will keep coming as long as CCP deems it necessary.
 
 And hey, who's to say Dust 514 WONT be released for the PS4? They aren't working on it right now for obvious reasons - some of broke ******* can't afford to drop the money on a completely new console right now. I'm a PC gamer who bought the PS3 solely for Dust 514. Just saying, it's not that the option isn't available it's just not their focus right now.
 
 Eve Online got the Trinity expansion which completely re-textured all of the ships, making a massive graphical improvement and ever since Retribution we've been getting all sorts of fancy new graphical elements - so you know they're not above doing it once they feel that the actual mechanics of the game are alright.
 
 Hell, Battlefield 3 never even bothered to patch the obvious bugs in their single player - just getting the NPCs to load in is a task and half, so don't say that this is unique to CCP, lol.
 
 ANON Diplomat // 3rd Place Winner of the Eight Thousand Suns Fiction Contest  | 
      
      
        |  Lance 2ballzStrong
 SyNergy Gaming
 EoN.
 
 4411
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 23:45:00 -
          [38] - Quote 
 Sorry but playing BF4 on current gen is a joke. That game wasn't made for it, but EA still published it because it's a money grab, and people still bought it. That game shines on next gen and PC.
 
 But even IF you want to compare...lol
 
 BF4 has so much more going on than DUST will ever have. Destruction alone is the reason why rendering is crap. A whole map changes based on destroying a wall, meanwhile in DUST a LAV "blows up"
  ...please. 
 ( ._.) <('.'<)  "There there Mr. Heavy, it's not your fault CCP doesn't care about you" | 
      
      
        |  Sgt Kirk
 SyNergy Gaming
 EoN.
 
 2587
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.04 23:47:00 -
          [39] - Quote 
 
 Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Sorry but playing BF4 on current gen is a joke. That game wasn't made for it, but EA still published it because it's a money grab, and people still bought it. That game shines on next gen and PC.  But even IF you want to compare...lol BF4 has so much more going on than DUST will ever have. Destruction alone is the reason why rendering is crap. A whole map changes based on destroying a wall, meanwhile in DUST a LAV "blows up" from a ridiculously overpowered no-skill swarm launcher   ...please. Fixed
 
 The newer the berry the dumber the juice. | 
      
      
        |  Iron Wolf Saber
 Den of Swords
 
 9897
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.05 00:33:00 -
          [40] - Quote 
 
 Meeko Fent wrote:*watches video*Looks like a great game guys! Remember, try and watch it in its entirety. 
 QA?
 
 CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier Specialist Curren/t Theme \\= Advanced Heavy Machine Gun =// Unlocked. | 
      
      
        |  dogmanpig
 black market bank
 
 31
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.05 01:00:00 -
          [41] - Quote 
 
 soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  So they made a bad looking game on purpose. Thats no excuse Bro. Next gen will always look better, but Im speaking on the here and now...PS3 You can always upgrade to a pc or next gen.   P.S. Graphics do not make a game. I would rather play a ****** looking game that is fun than a pretty one that sucks. Case in point Dust. graphics were meh in chromosome, in uprising they are pretty, but the game is no longer fun.  i was fine with the graphics in chromosme and it didn't negatively effect gameplay.... uprising is negatively effecting gameplay while not being up to BF3 level of graphics. in a side by side BF3 has better graphics so this thread is just LOL to me. i rarely had any rendering problems in BF4 beta while i cant go 2 minutes without fighting rendering in dust.
 i played the BF4 beta on PS3 btw so your claim that it had worse rendering is just a lie. there was only one place in conquest that had a issue, in dust its everywhere.
 
 You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way.  Level 7 1/3 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around" | 
      
      
        |  bonkersfox
 Foxhound Corporation
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 245
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.05 11:08:00 -
          [42] - Quote 
 dribble...... for a future war dust is very low tech, oh and you cant drop a building on a camping sniper in dust,
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Michael Arck
 Anubis Prime Syndicate
 
 1756
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.05 11:33:00 -
          [43] - Quote 
 Next gen isn't next gen until about next year.
 | 
      
      
        |  Ripcord19981
 KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
 
 212
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.06 23:25:00 -
          [44] - Quote 
 
 MPX Shad wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  So they made a bad looking game on purpose. Thats no excuse Bro. Next gen will always look better, but Im speaking on the here and now...PS3 is that you zion shad?
 
 I can only please one person per day. Today is not ur day, tomorrow doesn't look too bright either. Turkey sammich>taco | 
      
      
        |  Zion Shad
 ZionTCD
 Public Disorder.
 
 1949
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.11.06 23:29:00 -
          [45] - Quote 
 
 Ripcord19981 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:MPX Shad wrote:After getting sometime on BF4 Multiplayer on the PS3, I must say DUST514 has that game beat down in the looks department. The rendering so bad it looks like a PS2 game at times. So if anyone still wants to say this game does not hold up to Battlefield in graphics, you're wrong. LOL! BF4 is meant for the next gen consoles and pc. the ps3 and 360 versions are dumbed down.  So they made a bad looking game on purpose. Thats no excuse Bro. Next gen will always look better, but Im speaking on the here and now...PS3 is that you zion shad? 
 Yes it's me and no I'm not dead
  Though it's off topic in this thread, Good to see you!.... 
 and thanks for the bump
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1 [2]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |