|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization
Test Friends Please Ignore
442
   |
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
id like to keep those 3 bullets when reloading.
i need to conserve ammo.
now unless u give players the ability to resupply ammo from dead corpses on the battlefield this should not happen.
as ppl tend to reload after every shot.
now this would mean those players would run out of ammo before every1 else on the map.
but after u kill your enemy and survive a fire fight.
rnt u gonna have to reload your gun at some point in time?
u finished up a fight and have a a bunch of rounds left in your gun.
and so its best to reload to get your gun ready for any encounter.
this would just mean that u wouldnt be able to kill anything as every1 would have no ammo.
imagine a heavy with an hmg.
425 fires 200.
reloads for next encounter.
loses all that use full ammo.
its unneeded, will hurt gameplay even more, and is completely pointless.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
100% chance of trolls is to be expected. |
CLONE117
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
448
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
lets see how many times have i been caught out in the open with no ammo?.
to many times to count.
this would make it worse.
who here hates having no ammo?
who here has ever ran out of ammo and been forced to run up and try to hit ppl to death?.
ive had to do this too many times already because ppl were too greedy with their own nanohives.
this would ruin alot of stuff. we would need to make the small blaster turret a light weapon to compensate for it.
______________________________________________________________________________________
there is a massive lack of logic here. yet we seem to have an abundance of stupidity. |
CLONE117
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
448
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
dusts gameplay currently is similar to that of many other games.
but what might make the game better than our boring generic shooter is pve.
a pve better than all the others.
dust right now is more "fun" than those boring generic shooters anyways. |
CLONE117
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
448
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
alien survivor mode?.
hmm sounds alot like halos firefight.
blackops zombies mode.
gears of wars horde mode.
if all they can do is make remakes of modes where all u do is fight a relentless wave of enemies till u die its not good. its boring. because it has been redone over and over so many times.
there is no winning in most of these modes. as it is designed as an insta loss scenario.
i have no sole interest in the always boring multiplayer of the next games of the series.
im more interested in the campaign than anything else.
right now i feel the 4player coop only modes are boring.
i would like to player a pve coop mode with a team of more than 4 players.
maybe 20 players. and then face a mass amount of enemies afterwards and making it objective based instead another remade/boring survival mode. dust feels like the only game a player could keep coming back to after those several rage quits. the game still has much potential of becoming great. as its not finished yet. |
|
|
| |
|