DUST Search - [REQUEST] Limit the amount of droplinks/nanohives people have on field

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[REQUEST] Limit the amount of droplinks/nanohives people have on field

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KingBlade82 NECROM0NGERS 208	Posted - 2013.11.01 03:15:00 - [1] - Quote just as we have limited player count and limited vehicles we should also limit the amount of droplinks and nanohives each team can put down in some areas mainly PC and Domination I notice a lot of lag when playing on maps where the enemy or friendly team puts a lot of them on the map until this problem is fixed I suggest you limit the amount you can have active per team so we have more stable games with higher tier players JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY need 10 mil SP and a mic
GET ATMESON Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 161	Posted - 2013.11.01 06:18:00 - [2] - Quote I agree with this. There shouldnt be more nano then drop uplinks.
Nova Knife Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 2062	Posted - 2013.11.01 11:08:00 - [3] - Quote There already is a limit. People are just using a loophole in the system to bypass it and spam the field. :(
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2373	Posted - 2013.11.01 13:29:00 - [4] - Quote No Nova, he's complaining about something one or two Logis can do with a single suit. He doesn't want three or four uplinks all within a thirty meter radius of an objective because he can't deal with it. The thing is that uplinks and their density isn't what is preventing his team from taking an objective, it's his team's ability to deal with the density of enemy guns in the area. After all, uplinks don't kill, guns do. So maybe we should limit the number of guns that can be active near an objective so that his team can take it more readily without having to deal with any more complicated tactics than a simple zerg? Lets just say that your gun won't work if it's within ten meters of another gun. That will get rid of all that gun spam on the objective and force the defending team to use more tactics than just packing the area with guns. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it?
Sana Rayya WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL The Ascendancy 345	Posted - 2013.11.01 15:02:00 - [5] - Quote While there is some credence to the fact that heavy uplink/hive spam can cause lag in games (especially in the lab room facility), it is also very easy to clear said uplinks. Allotek fluxes + nanohives will get rid of everything and net you a tidy sum of points.
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2375	Posted - 2013.11.01 15:30:00 - [6] - Quote Sana Rayya wrote: While there is some credence to the fact that heavy uplink/hive spam can cause lag in games (especially in the lab room facility), it is also very easy to clear said uplinks. Allotek fluxes + nanohives will get rid of everything and net you a tidy sum of points. The prevelence of scanners means it's nearly impossible to hide an uplink again, forcing us to lay down a few more to have any chance of keeping any alive for use.
Sana Rayya WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL The Ascendancy 345	Posted - 2013.11.01 15:34:00 - [7] - Quote Skihids wrote: The prevelence of scanners means it's nearly impossible to hide an uplink again, forcing us to lay down a few more to have any chance of keeping any alive for use. I've noticed that my scanner sometimes fails to detect uplinks for some reason. They pick up nanohives but not always uplinks. Usually I have to rely on line of sight detection to find them.
KingBlade82 NECROM0NGERS 210	Posted - 2013.11.02 03:26:00 - [8] - Quote Well im talking about stability of game nothing else some of u guys r way off on what I ment lol JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY need 10 mil SP and a mic
SirManBoy Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 336	Posted - 2013.11.02 09:01:00 - [9] - Quote The game needs to be able to handle it and it usually does. There is no exploit/bypass here. Logis like myself have a lot of time invested into these skills and we want to take full advantage of them. And while I am firmly against ANY restrictions on equipment use, whatsoever, one major flaw in your particular suggestion is that it would cap the equipment regardless of the quality of the equipment (standard vs. proto) and the deployment location of the equipment (near vs. far). He who is first to deploy his equipment would ensure that his equipment gets deployed despite the fact that there might be a particularly skilled and experienced support player who has better equipment and better judgement as to its placement on the field and therefore would help his team more if only his equipment was on the field. No thanks.
Eris Ernaga DUST University Ivy League 624	Posted - 2013.11.02 09:49:00 - [10] - Quote KingBlade82 wrote: just as we have limited player count and limited vehicles we should also limit the amount of droplinks and nanohives each team can put down in some areas mainly PC and Domination I notice a lot of lag when playing on maps where the enemy or friendly team puts a lot of them on the map until this problem is fixed I suggest you limit the amount you can have active per team so we have more stable games with higher tier players It's a strategy learn to deal with it plus equipment destruction gives you war points now so you should be easy. Also the max amount of uplinks a player can put down is 3 so unless the entire enemy team has skilled in to and is utilizing uplinks you shouldn't have to big of a problem. It all comes down to fitting preparations and battlefield strategys.

KingBlade82 NECROM0NGERS 210	Posted - 2013.11.02 13:09:00 - [11] - Quote plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY need 10 mil SP and a mic
SirManBoy Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 336	Posted - 2013.11.02 15:56:00 - [12] - Quote KingBlade82 wrote: plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is Then make a new thread: [REQUEST] Optimize game to handle mass equipment deployment. The answer shouldn't involve restricting gameplay, it should be about improving game performance.
Smooth Assassin Stardust incorporation 327	Posted - 2013.11.02 16:19:00 - [13] - Quote Uplinks should get a radius when placed down so no other noob tries to take your spot when placing another down especially if its a good spot, the higher the tier of uplink the more the radius. *Assassination is my thing.*
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2378	Posted - 2013.11.02 18:41:00 - [14] - Quote Smooth Assassin wrote: Uplinks should get a radius when placed down so no other noob tries to take your spot when placing another down especially if its a good spot, the higher the tier of uplink the more the radius. Do you people put thirty seconds of thought in before you spam your ideas? What's to prevent a "noob" from being first to claim a spot with a poor placement and lock everyone else out?
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2378	Posted - 2013.11.02 18:45:00 - [15] - Quote KingBlade82 wrote: plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is Then make a suggestion in the FEEDBACK forum that CCP simplify equipment animation for PC.
Galvan Nized Deep Space Republic Top Men. 227	Posted - 2013.11.02 19:03:00 - [16] - Quote To help with lag yes, but really wish CCP would develop better ways to handle the uplinks that would allow matches to remain stable. As a tactic no, they are a legit way to take objectives. Really would like a counter though. Like an equipment spawn jammer that locks out uplinks or at least adds to the timer. These should have a large radius.
KingBlade82 NECROM0NGERS 210	Posted - 2013.11.03 00:04:00 - [17] - Quote SirManBoy wrote: KingBlade82 wrote: plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is Then make a new thread: [REQUEST] Optimize game to handle mass equipment deployment. The answer shouldn't involve restricting gameplay, it should be about improving game performance. u should read my first post I said until it can handle it and I don't believe CCP knows what to do tbh im giving the simple answer JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY need 10 mil SP and a mic
KingBlade82 NECROM0NGERS 210	Posted - 2013.11.03 00:06:00 - [18] - Quote Skihids wrote: KingBlade82 wrote: plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is Then make a suggestion in the FEEDBACK forum that CCP simplify equipment animation for PC. how would u simplify it? I do like seeing the glows helps me determine where to go for what JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY need 10 mil SP and a mic
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2380	Posted - 2013.11.03 00:52:00 - [19] - Quote KingBlade82 wrote: Skihids wrote: KingBlade82 wrote: plz only if ur a PC vet respond.........I swear some of u have no idea what I mean didn't know I had to explain but "REAL GAMES" look like Christmas where santa-logis place 15 uplinks and 15-20 nanos per team and when u come close to it the lag is so bad u can barely walk without skipping frames :P I could care less about them putting them up its just about how horrible gameplay is Then make a suggestion in the FEEDBACK forum that CCP simplify equipment animation for PC. how would u simplify it? I do like seeing the glows helps me determine where to go for what Perhaps a static glow? Right now it's got a pulsing radius with a sparkly interior. That's got to use a fair amount of processor power.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.