I think we need to move away from specialist >>>> standard concepts.

... If had to remake the enforce it would be to double the magazine size and ammo reserves and significantly up its HP but lower its overall acceleration (max speed is the same) and maybe two topside guns and the nose gun position still. Bonuses would be things to enable to keep shooting for longer (so heat reduction, cooldown faster, larger mags for non heating turrets)

As for muraders

Dual Large Guns :D

Well I was imagining marauders being anything not infantry destroyers. So annoying tanks on the field or an enforcer holding a spot too good call in a murader to get rid of it..

Drawbacks being slower turret rate of turn, shallower ammo reserves (as dual guns are going to eat it twice as fast) and maybe slower top speed, removed nose gun single top gun maybe stronger forward resistances to withstand other vehicles and hp and tanking values similar to that of standard HAVs.

Logi DS and LAVs I was thinking as the logibro for vehicles, so nanohives,and reppers bonuses may be a remote resistance amp for infantry OR vehicles. Logi DS will have superior range of their support and ability to fly but the LAV would be much lowe r profile ground hugger and a possible capable mine sweeper.

Scout LAV is a bit hard but maybe a permanently on scanner would work and a small radar dish on top. Could possibly run a tacnet jammer or emp generator to offline OMS to allow them to be hacked while posing a less of a threat.

Both Specialist LAVs lose their back turret.

Logi LAV gets a two seat rear MCRU bus instead.

Scout LAV mounting changes in the back for the sensor package but has a small controlled by passenger turret mounted on top.

Specialized vehicles should be sidegrades, not upgrades. Gain something to fill a specific role better, but lose something else to balance it. The prices should close to the basic vehicles though.