|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1257
   |
Posted - 2013.10.24 15:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
My guess is the current AR will get the same range as the breach and maybe the same dmg with a higher rate of fire. I'd also guess that the TAC and burst will be dropped down a bit range wise as well.
so the only way I can think for the breach to be even worth using is if the DMG gets a good sized buff, maybe 10 points or so...then I got to thinking, that will be crazy OP.
They can't nerf the range or the mag otherwise is will be completely useless, even with a dmg buff.
So I believe that can only mean one thing, they will remove the breach AR from the game. CCP, am I wrong? |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1257
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 15:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Honestly its probably just going to be left there since removing it from the market and players inventories is going to be more trouble than its worth and thats not considering how many might have fittings with it equipped
It would be pointless to use it though, unless they buff the dmg and I really think that could break the weapon. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1257
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 16:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Honestly its probably just going to be left there since removing it from the market and players inventories is going to be more trouble than its worth and thats not considering how many might have fittings with it equipped It would be pointless to use it though, unless they buff the dmg and I really think that could break the weapon. I agree entirely but with all the other things CCP needs to work on I doubt removing a mostly useless variant is high up on their list, thats why I think its going to be left as is Oh yeah, no question there. But eventually they will have to take a look at it once we get all the rifles and everything settled.
|
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1257
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 16:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
mikegunnz wrote:Only reason breach ar is rarely used is because it was WAY overnerfed back in the day.(many of us called it)
The breach needs its dmg buffed back to original levels (+5pts, if i remember correctly) and the proto variant needs its additional 6 rounds back.
Yeah they tend to go overboard with nerfs. Like with the flaylock and TAC. They didn't need to drop the bullet count so low on the TAC and the dmg on the flaylock and radius didn't need a massive nerf, just half of what they got would have been fine.
Just to be clear, I did not use or endorse said weapons pre nerf(ok, maybe the TAC for PC battles but I still knew it was OP) |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1257
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 17:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Flaylock can still quite happly kill tbh. Player perception is a massive issue these days in fotm like scr users. I just getting wtf pawned cuz they don't no how to UAE it or its pitfalls
It was really strong, even at base STD level(the only one I tried)
It's bot bad now, just unreliable. I know my SMG will alway finish off someone but my flaylock is a bit random. The only reason I use it is cause it looks cool and the fitting requirements really fit on to my PG heavy Gallente suits. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1258
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 18:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:People still use the Breach. There's been a few games where I saw it on the feed too. Even I use it from time to time. It's poop.
I can never understand why, it just plain awful at lower levels and even at higher levels the risk just isn't even worth it when you can use a litterly any other weapon at basic or advanced and get a better performance. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1798
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 17:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
Man, I can call some stuff out.
Also, why did I call it a TAC and not a TAR?
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
|
|
| |
|