Revelations 514
Red Star. EoN.
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
So I have all my SP, (lvl 5 proffs) and far, far more playing time using the SG, and it's tough as nails to kill an AR User even if CQC and I have the drop on them and all variables in my favor.
Then, I use a militia AR, with 0SP invested and no practice, and am beast mode, (top five in the match every single game). This is with the friggen default fitting FFS.
I guess I am just "naturally" awesome with the AR right?
I also have a sniper fit I actually feel like I earn kills with. It's militia as well. I also have an SMG fit. Easier to kill but still not as easy as the AR. Mass Driver, never used it, same with HMG and FG.
When it comes right down to it, I guess I am just a natural god at the DUST version of an AR right?
You want an accurate test? Go ahead and spec into another weapon, then in the same match see which one you do better with.
Not that I actually expect you to, or even be honest, as you have obviously proven that you do not care about facts but use BS picks at "made up statistics" you asshat. Even your own "logic" is flawed and you choose not to recognize it. Definition of a troll. Need proof? Take your statements in this very posting about how you "prove" something and apply them to your own statements. They don't hold up and your not fooling anyone.
On a side note, it looks like your "profession" taught you how to spell about as well as they taught you to approach statistics dubiously. If you only believe in statistics you perform yourself, and the other person does the same, that makes you both right and both wrong subjectively dumbass, and achieves nothing even close to a burden of proof.
Nerf the AR and be done with it as it needs it. Or don't. I really don't even care anymore but cannot resist trolling a troll. I'm smarter than you though so it makes it easy. Don't worry I used statistics I found on my own for that conclusion, so by your logic it's true.
|
Revelations 514
Red Star. EoN.
141
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 19:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
m twiggz wrote:meri jin wrote:BARDAS wrote:What do you mean by "this time"? It was ALWAYS the Assault Rifle that was most OP out of all the weapons. Everyone knows it too. Aim Assist just brought more attention to it is all as people with ****** aim can now melt faces from 100 meters in under a second with a Duvolle or Gek. Now that is constructive! And absolutely not over the top. Definitely over the top. He must be playing a different game. CoD: MW2 with a UMP and silencer perhaps? Now that was an OP weapon. Maybe CoD: Black Ops with a AKu, grip and extended mag? Now that was an OP weapon. AR in dust? Definitely not OP. Did you see players in those games complaining on forums about the 'OP' weapons begging for nerfs? No. Of course people would rage all over the place about it but they dealt with it and adapted their play styles. Maybe you should also look into doing so... Never the less you will always have people complaining something is OP. The only true way to fix that is to give all weapons the same amount of damage, same clip size, same range, etc. and just give them different names and rounds/projectiles. Would that make for a fun game? In my opinion, no. Each weapon has a different tactical advantage, use your weapon the way its meant to be used and you should do just fine. Unless you're bad. Then you'll always be bad.
This is BS. Go look at the MW forums..... Cries for nerfs are common and are granted just as commonly. MW is really big about weapon balance, and take more than just math into consideration as they have been doing this awhile. Also, even the ones they tweak are not nearly as broken as the AR is in Dust. They had better balance, and fixed things quickly which is why it was not as publicized. It took them less than a month to nerf the FMG's and Type-95. The Type-95 they tweaked again a month later and the ACR after that.
Just spouting nonsense like, people just dealt with it tells me you have never actually been to the COD forums. |